Cutting edges cut both ways

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Emphasis on "cutting edge" science is common today. This paper shows that the concept, which selects some science at any given time as epistemically preferable and therefore "better," actually gained acceptance by the turn of this century in biology and began immediately to have consequences for what biological research was done. The result, that some research is cut out while other work is privileged, can have pernicious results. Some of what is designated as not cutting edge may, in a different - and equally defensible epistemological framework, prove just as "good" as the officially cutting edge research. Cutting edges cut both ways, and those who study science should begin exploring the implications of that fact.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalBiology & Philosophy
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Keywords

  • Cutting edge
  • Harrison
  • Morgan
  • cytology
  • embryology
  • epistemological/epistemic
  • experimentation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cutting edges cut both ways'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this