Customizing clinical narratives for the electronic medical record interface using cognitive methods

Pallav Sharda, Amar K. Das, Trevor A. Cohen, Vimla Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: As healthcare practice transitions from paper-based to computer-based records, there is increasing need to determine an effective electronic format for clinical narratives. Our research focuses on utilizing a cognitive science methodology to guide the conversion of medical texts to a more structured, user-customized presentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). Design: We studied the use of discharge summaries by psychiatrists with varying expertise - experts, intermediates, and novices. Experts were given two hypothetical emergency care scenarios with narrative discharge summaries and asked to verbalize their clinical assessment. Based on the results, the narratives were presented in a more structured form. Intermediate and novice subjects received a narrative and a structured discharge summary, and were asked to verbalize their assessments of each. Measurements: A qualitative comparison of the interview transcripts of all subjects was done by analysis of recall and inference made with respect to level of expertise. Results: For intermediate and novice subjects, recall was greater with the structured form than with the narrative. Novices were also able to make more inferences (not always accurate) from the structured form than with the narrative. Errors occurred in assessments using the narrative form but not the structured form. Conclusions: Our cognitive methods to study discharge summary use enabled us to extract a conceptual representation of clinical narratives from end-users. This method allowed us to identify clinically relevant information that can be used to structure medical text for the EMR and potentially improve recall and reduce errors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)346-368
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume75
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Medical Electronics
Cognitive Science
Emergency Medical Services
Psychiatry
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Cognitive science
  • Electronic medical records
  • Medical narratives
  • Mental health care
  • User interface

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Customizing clinical narratives for the electronic medical record interface using cognitive methods. / Sharda, Pallav; Das, Amar K.; Cohen, Trevor A.; Patel, Vimla.

In: International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 75, No. 5, 01.05.2006, p. 346-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sharda, Pallav ; Das, Amar K. ; Cohen, Trevor A. ; Patel, Vimla. / Customizing clinical narratives for the electronic medical record interface using cognitive methods. In: International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2006 ; Vol. 75, No. 5. pp. 346-368.
@article{bc94151e452c4113afedf5e79d20e68b,
title = "Customizing clinical narratives for the electronic medical record interface using cognitive methods",
abstract = "Objective: As healthcare practice transitions from paper-based to computer-based records, there is increasing need to determine an effective electronic format for clinical narratives. Our research focuses on utilizing a cognitive science methodology to guide the conversion of medical texts to a more structured, user-customized presentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). Design: We studied the use of discharge summaries by psychiatrists with varying expertise - experts, intermediates, and novices. Experts were given two hypothetical emergency care scenarios with narrative discharge summaries and asked to verbalize their clinical assessment. Based on the results, the narratives were presented in a more structured form. Intermediate and novice subjects received a narrative and a structured discharge summary, and were asked to verbalize their assessments of each. Measurements: A qualitative comparison of the interview transcripts of all subjects was done by analysis of recall and inference made with respect to level of expertise. Results: For intermediate and novice subjects, recall was greater with the structured form than with the narrative. Novices were also able to make more inferences (not always accurate) from the structured form than with the narrative. Errors occurred in assessments using the narrative form but not the structured form. Conclusions: Our cognitive methods to study discharge summary use enabled us to extract a conceptual representation of clinical narratives from end-users. This method allowed us to identify clinically relevant information that can be used to structure medical text for the EMR and potentially improve recall and reduce errors.",
keywords = "Cognitive science, Electronic medical records, Medical narratives, Mental health care, User interface",
author = "Pallav Sharda and Das, {Amar K.} and Cohen, {Trevor A.} and Vimla Patel",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "346--368",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Informatics",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Customizing clinical narratives for the electronic medical record interface using cognitive methods

AU - Sharda, Pallav

AU - Das, Amar K.

AU - Cohen, Trevor A.

AU - Patel, Vimla

PY - 2006/5/1

Y1 - 2006/5/1

N2 - Objective: As healthcare practice transitions from paper-based to computer-based records, there is increasing need to determine an effective electronic format for clinical narratives. Our research focuses on utilizing a cognitive science methodology to guide the conversion of medical texts to a more structured, user-customized presentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). Design: We studied the use of discharge summaries by psychiatrists with varying expertise - experts, intermediates, and novices. Experts were given two hypothetical emergency care scenarios with narrative discharge summaries and asked to verbalize their clinical assessment. Based on the results, the narratives were presented in a more structured form. Intermediate and novice subjects received a narrative and a structured discharge summary, and were asked to verbalize their assessments of each. Measurements: A qualitative comparison of the interview transcripts of all subjects was done by analysis of recall and inference made with respect to level of expertise. Results: For intermediate and novice subjects, recall was greater with the structured form than with the narrative. Novices were also able to make more inferences (not always accurate) from the structured form than with the narrative. Errors occurred in assessments using the narrative form but not the structured form. Conclusions: Our cognitive methods to study discharge summary use enabled us to extract a conceptual representation of clinical narratives from end-users. This method allowed us to identify clinically relevant information that can be used to structure medical text for the EMR and potentially improve recall and reduce errors.

AB - Objective: As healthcare practice transitions from paper-based to computer-based records, there is increasing need to determine an effective electronic format for clinical narratives. Our research focuses on utilizing a cognitive science methodology to guide the conversion of medical texts to a more structured, user-customized presentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). Design: We studied the use of discharge summaries by psychiatrists with varying expertise - experts, intermediates, and novices. Experts were given two hypothetical emergency care scenarios with narrative discharge summaries and asked to verbalize their clinical assessment. Based on the results, the narratives were presented in a more structured form. Intermediate and novice subjects received a narrative and a structured discharge summary, and were asked to verbalize their assessments of each. Measurements: A qualitative comparison of the interview transcripts of all subjects was done by analysis of recall and inference made with respect to level of expertise. Results: For intermediate and novice subjects, recall was greater with the structured form than with the narrative. Novices were also able to make more inferences (not always accurate) from the structured form than with the narrative. Errors occurred in assessments using the narrative form but not the structured form. Conclusions: Our cognitive methods to study discharge summary use enabled us to extract a conceptual representation of clinical narratives from end-users. This method allowed us to identify clinically relevant information that can be used to structure medical text for the EMR and potentially improve recall and reduce errors.

KW - Cognitive science

KW - Electronic medical records

KW - Medical narratives

KW - Mental health care

KW - User interface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645411224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645411224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.027

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 16125455

AN - SCOPUS:33645411224

VL - 75

SP - 346

EP - 368

JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics

JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics

SN - 1386-5056

IS - 5

ER -