Curriculum vitae analyses of engineering Ph.D.s working in academia and industry

Monica F. Cox, Tasha Zephirin, Nikitha Sambamurthy, Benjamin Ahn, Jeremi London, Osman Cekic, Ana Torres, Jiabin Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years there have been discussions surrounding the under-preparedness of Ph.D. graduates of highly specialized doctoral programs, lacking interdisciplinary focus and professional skill development, to succeed in future complex work environments. To address these concerns, Golde and Walker suggest re-conceptualizing doctoral education such that Ph.D. holders are developed as "stewards" of their disciplines. To provide initial insights into how engineering can be viewed through a stewardship lens, the authors conducted a content analysis of thirty-six curricula vitae of engineering Ph.D. holders who have been employed in one of four occupational sectors- (1) academia only, (2) industry only, (3) academia and then industry, or(4) industry and then academia. Thiseffort seekstooperationalize their experiences into the three tenants of the stewardship framework - generation, conservation and transformation - and provide a new perspective for future discussions around the preparation and expectations of engineering Ph.D. holders. Industry participants reported higher generation and conservation than academia only participants; academia to industry participants reported higher instances of generation followed by conservation; industry to academia participants, on average, reported higher generation; and a new category, "other," was the lowest instance across all groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1205-1221
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Engineering Education
Volume29
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Curricula
engineering
curriculum
industry
Industry
Conservation
conservation
work environment
Lenses
content analysis
Education
graduate
education
experience
Group

Keywords

  • Curricula vitae
  • Doctoral education
  • Engineering professionals
  • Stewardship

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Cox, M. F., Zephirin, T., Sambamurthy, N., Ahn, B., London, J., Cekic, O., ... Zhu, J. (2013). Curriculum vitae analyses of engineering Ph.D.s working in academia and industry. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(5), 1205-1221.

Curriculum vitae analyses of engineering Ph.D.s working in academia and industry. / Cox, Monica F.; Zephirin, Tasha; Sambamurthy, Nikitha; Ahn, Benjamin; London, Jeremi; Cekic, Osman; Torres, Ana; Zhu, Jiabin.

In: International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2013, p. 1205-1221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cox, MF, Zephirin, T, Sambamurthy, N, Ahn, B, London, J, Cekic, O, Torres, A & Zhu, J 2013, 'Curriculum vitae analyses of engineering Ph.D.s working in academia and industry', International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1205-1221.
Cox MF, Zephirin T, Sambamurthy N, Ahn B, London J, Cekic O et al. Curriculum vitae analyses of engineering Ph.D.s working in academia and industry. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2013;29(5):1205-1221.
Cox, Monica F. ; Zephirin, Tasha ; Sambamurthy, Nikitha ; Ahn, Benjamin ; London, Jeremi ; Cekic, Osman ; Torres, Ana ; Zhu, Jiabin. / Curriculum vitae analyses of engineering Ph.D.s working in academia and industry. In: International Journal of Engineering Education. 2013 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 1205-1221.
@article{afc2aa07cab94a47a459864ed45b6629,
title = "Curriculum vitae analyses of engineering Ph.D.s working in academia and industry",
abstract = "In recent years there have been discussions surrounding the under-preparedness of Ph.D. graduates of highly specialized doctoral programs, lacking interdisciplinary focus and professional skill development, to succeed in future complex work environments. To address these concerns, Golde and Walker suggest re-conceptualizing doctoral education such that Ph.D. holders are developed as {"}stewards{"} of their disciplines. To provide initial insights into how engineering can be viewed through a stewardship lens, the authors conducted a content analysis of thirty-six curricula vitae of engineering Ph.D. holders who have been employed in one of four occupational sectors- (1) academia only, (2) industry only, (3) academia and then industry, or(4) industry and then academia. Thiseffort seekstooperationalize their experiences into the three tenants of the stewardship framework - generation, conservation and transformation - and provide a new perspective for future discussions around the preparation and expectations of engineering Ph.D. holders. Industry participants reported higher generation and conservation than academia only participants; academia to industry participants reported higher instances of generation followed by conservation; industry to academia participants, on average, reported higher generation; and a new category, {"}other,{"} was the lowest instance across all groups.",
keywords = "Curricula vitae, Doctoral education, Engineering professionals, Stewardship",
author = "Cox, {Monica F.} and Tasha Zephirin and Nikitha Sambamurthy and Benjamin Ahn and Jeremi London and Osman Cekic and Ana Torres and Jiabin Zhu",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1205--1221",
journal = "International Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "0949-149X",
publisher = "Tempus Publications",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Curriculum vitae analyses of engineering Ph.D.s working in academia and industry

AU - Cox, Monica F.

AU - Zephirin, Tasha

AU - Sambamurthy, Nikitha

AU - Ahn, Benjamin

AU - London, Jeremi

AU - Cekic, Osman

AU - Torres, Ana

AU - Zhu, Jiabin

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In recent years there have been discussions surrounding the under-preparedness of Ph.D. graduates of highly specialized doctoral programs, lacking interdisciplinary focus and professional skill development, to succeed in future complex work environments. To address these concerns, Golde and Walker suggest re-conceptualizing doctoral education such that Ph.D. holders are developed as "stewards" of their disciplines. To provide initial insights into how engineering can be viewed through a stewardship lens, the authors conducted a content analysis of thirty-six curricula vitae of engineering Ph.D. holders who have been employed in one of four occupational sectors- (1) academia only, (2) industry only, (3) academia and then industry, or(4) industry and then academia. Thiseffort seekstooperationalize their experiences into the three tenants of the stewardship framework - generation, conservation and transformation - and provide a new perspective for future discussions around the preparation and expectations of engineering Ph.D. holders. Industry participants reported higher generation and conservation than academia only participants; academia to industry participants reported higher instances of generation followed by conservation; industry to academia participants, on average, reported higher generation; and a new category, "other," was the lowest instance across all groups.

AB - In recent years there have been discussions surrounding the under-preparedness of Ph.D. graduates of highly specialized doctoral programs, lacking interdisciplinary focus and professional skill development, to succeed in future complex work environments. To address these concerns, Golde and Walker suggest re-conceptualizing doctoral education such that Ph.D. holders are developed as "stewards" of their disciplines. To provide initial insights into how engineering can be viewed through a stewardship lens, the authors conducted a content analysis of thirty-six curricula vitae of engineering Ph.D. holders who have been employed in one of four occupational sectors- (1) academia only, (2) industry only, (3) academia and then industry, or(4) industry and then academia. Thiseffort seekstooperationalize their experiences into the three tenants of the stewardship framework - generation, conservation and transformation - and provide a new perspective for future discussions around the preparation and expectations of engineering Ph.D. holders. Industry participants reported higher generation and conservation than academia only participants; academia to industry participants reported higher instances of generation followed by conservation; industry to academia participants, on average, reported higher generation; and a new category, "other," was the lowest instance across all groups.

KW - Curricula vitae

KW - Doctoral education

KW - Engineering professionals

KW - Stewardship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885631274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885631274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84885631274

VL - 29

SP - 1205

EP - 1221

JO - International Journal of Engineering Education

JF - International Journal of Engineering Education

SN - 0949-149X

IS - 5

ER -