Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches

Pascal Frank, Laura Stanszus, Daniel Fischer, Klara Kehnel, Paul Grossman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Objectives: Qualitative methods come along with specific methodological backgrounds and related empirical strengths and weaknesses. Research is lacking addressing the question of what it precisely means to study mindfulness practices from a particular methodological point of view. The aim of this paper is to shed light on what qualities of mindfulness different qualitative methods can elucidate. Methods: Based on interviews stemming from participants of a consumer-focused mindfulness training (BiNKA), we undertook a comparison of four different analyses, namely content analysis (CA), grounded theory (GT), interpretative-phenomenological analysis (IPA), and discourse analysis (DA). Results: Independently applying the four methods on our data material led to the following findings: CA demonstrated that the training had effects on self-awareness, well-being, and the development of ethical qualities and influenced pre-consumptive stages of participants; GT revealed the complex set of conditions determining whether and how the mindfulness training influenced the attendees; IPA highlighted the subjectivity of the mindfulness experience, suggesting that (1) different training elements have varying effects on participants and (2) it is often not the meditation practice, but other course elements that cause the effects experienced by the attendees; DA demonstrated that the course experience was influenced by subjective theories held by the participants. In particular, they showed typical strategies of rationalizing their consumption. Conclusions: A pluralistic qualitative research assists in identifying blind spots and limitations of a single method, increases the self-reflexivity, and helps to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding of mindfulness practice or other processes of covert lived experience.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalMindfulness
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    Mindfulness
    grounded theory
    discourse analysis
    qualitative method
    content analysis
    subjective theory
    experience
    meditation
    self awareness
    reflexivity
    subjectivity
    qualitative research
    Meditation
    Qualitative Research
    well-being
    Optic Disk
    cause
    interview
    Interviews
    Research

    Keywords

    • Mindfulness
    • Pluralistic qualitative research
    • Qualitative
    • Reflexive methodology
    • Sustainable consumption

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Health(social science)
    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology
    • Applied Psychology

    Cite this

    Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches. / Frank, Pascal; Stanszus, Laura; Fischer, Daniel; Kehnel, Klara; Grossman, Paul.

    In: Mindfulness, 01.01.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{7f988fa346f1449fbdc9d3e264344bb5,
    title = "Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches",
    abstract = "Objectives: Qualitative methods come along with specific methodological backgrounds and related empirical strengths and weaknesses. Research is lacking addressing the question of what it precisely means to study mindfulness practices from a particular methodological point of view. The aim of this paper is to shed light on what qualities of mindfulness different qualitative methods can elucidate. Methods: Based on interviews stemming from participants of a consumer-focused mindfulness training (BiNKA), we undertook a comparison of four different analyses, namely content analysis (CA), grounded theory (GT), interpretative-phenomenological analysis (IPA), and discourse analysis (DA). Results: Independently applying the four methods on our data material led to the following findings: CA demonstrated that the training had effects on self-awareness, well-being, and the development of ethical qualities and influenced pre-consumptive stages of participants; GT revealed the complex set of conditions determining whether and how the mindfulness training influenced the attendees; IPA highlighted the subjectivity of the mindfulness experience, suggesting that (1) different training elements have varying effects on participants and (2) it is often not the meditation practice, but other course elements that cause the effects experienced by the attendees; DA demonstrated that the course experience was influenced by subjective theories held by the participants. In particular, they showed typical strategies of rationalizing their consumption. Conclusions: A pluralistic qualitative research assists in identifying blind spots and limitations of a single method, increases the self-reflexivity, and helps to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding of mindfulness practice or other processes of covert lived experience.",
    keywords = "Mindfulness, Pluralistic qualitative research, Qualitative, Reflexive methodology, Sustainable consumption",
    author = "Pascal Frank and Laura Stanszus and Daniel Fischer and Klara Kehnel and Paul Grossman",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s12671-019-01227-2",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "Mindfulness",
    issn = "1868-8527",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches

    AU - Frank, Pascal

    AU - Stanszus, Laura

    AU - Fischer, Daniel

    AU - Kehnel, Klara

    AU - Grossman, Paul

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - Objectives: Qualitative methods come along with specific methodological backgrounds and related empirical strengths and weaknesses. Research is lacking addressing the question of what it precisely means to study mindfulness practices from a particular methodological point of view. The aim of this paper is to shed light on what qualities of mindfulness different qualitative methods can elucidate. Methods: Based on interviews stemming from participants of a consumer-focused mindfulness training (BiNKA), we undertook a comparison of four different analyses, namely content analysis (CA), grounded theory (GT), interpretative-phenomenological analysis (IPA), and discourse analysis (DA). Results: Independently applying the four methods on our data material led to the following findings: CA demonstrated that the training had effects on self-awareness, well-being, and the development of ethical qualities and influenced pre-consumptive stages of participants; GT revealed the complex set of conditions determining whether and how the mindfulness training influenced the attendees; IPA highlighted the subjectivity of the mindfulness experience, suggesting that (1) different training elements have varying effects on participants and (2) it is often not the meditation practice, but other course elements that cause the effects experienced by the attendees; DA demonstrated that the course experience was influenced by subjective theories held by the participants. In particular, they showed typical strategies of rationalizing their consumption. Conclusions: A pluralistic qualitative research assists in identifying blind spots and limitations of a single method, increases the self-reflexivity, and helps to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding of mindfulness practice or other processes of covert lived experience.

    AB - Objectives: Qualitative methods come along with specific methodological backgrounds and related empirical strengths and weaknesses. Research is lacking addressing the question of what it precisely means to study mindfulness practices from a particular methodological point of view. The aim of this paper is to shed light on what qualities of mindfulness different qualitative methods can elucidate. Methods: Based on interviews stemming from participants of a consumer-focused mindfulness training (BiNKA), we undertook a comparison of four different analyses, namely content analysis (CA), grounded theory (GT), interpretative-phenomenological analysis (IPA), and discourse analysis (DA). Results: Independently applying the four methods on our data material led to the following findings: CA demonstrated that the training had effects on self-awareness, well-being, and the development of ethical qualities and influenced pre-consumptive stages of participants; GT revealed the complex set of conditions determining whether and how the mindfulness training influenced the attendees; IPA highlighted the subjectivity of the mindfulness experience, suggesting that (1) different training elements have varying effects on participants and (2) it is often not the meditation practice, but other course elements that cause the effects experienced by the attendees; DA demonstrated that the course experience was influenced by subjective theories held by the participants. In particular, they showed typical strategies of rationalizing their consumption. Conclusions: A pluralistic qualitative research assists in identifying blind spots and limitations of a single method, increases the self-reflexivity, and helps to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding of mindfulness practice or other processes of covert lived experience.

    KW - Mindfulness

    KW - Pluralistic qualitative research

    KW - Qualitative

    KW - Reflexive methodology

    KW - Sustainable consumption

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071478871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071478871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s12671-019-01227-2

    DO - 10.1007/s12671-019-01227-2

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85071478871

    JO - Mindfulness

    JF - Mindfulness

    SN - 1868-8527

    ER -