Crop insurance: A barrier to conservation adoption?

Michelle Fleckenstein; Ashlyn Lythgoe; Junyu Lu; Nathan Thompson; Otto Doering; Seth Harden; Jackie M. Getson; Linda Prokopy

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111223

Crop insurance: A barrier to conservation adoption?

Michelle Fleckenstein, Ashlyn Lythgoe, Junyu Lu, Nathan Thompson, Otto Doering, Seth Harden, Jackie M. Getson, Linda Prokopy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Midwest corn producers face inherent risks in their daily operations and incorporate risk-management strategies to reduce uncertainty; among these, crop insurance has dominated the agricultural landscape for decades. Previous research on conservation adoption has primarily examined the impact of individual-level characteristics on adoption, yet little is known about the impact of external factors, such as crop insurance. Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews and a multi-state survey to determine if crop insurance requirements limit cover crops and/or conservation tillage adoption for Midwest corn producers. Our findings indicate that crop insurance requirements are not a barrier to adoption. Rather, crop insurance and conservation practices serve unique - not contradictory - roles in Midwest producers’ operations and are used simultaneously. Future research should continue to identify and seek solutions for external barriers to broadly increase adoption rates.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	111223
Journal	Journal of Environmental Management
Volume	276
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111223
State	Published - Dec 15 2020

Keywords

Adoption
Conservation
Conservation tillage
Cover crops
Crop insurance
Risk-management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Environmental Engineering
Waste Management and Disposal
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111223

Cite this

@article{161ac0022e8f42c08a983e7019da99f2,

title = "Crop insurance: A barrier to conservation adoption?",

abstract = "Midwest corn producers face inherent risks in their daily operations and incorporate risk-management strategies to reduce uncertainty; among these, crop insurance has dominated the agricultural landscape for decades. Previous research on conservation adoption has primarily examined the impact of individual-level characteristics on adoption, yet little is known about the impact of external factors, such as crop insurance. Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews and a multi-state survey to determine if crop insurance requirements limit cover crops and/or conservation tillage adoption for Midwest corn producers. Our findings indicate that crop insurance requirements are not a barrier to adoption. Rather, crop insurance and conservation practices serve unique - not contradictory - roles in Midwest producers{\textquoteright} operations and are used simultaneously. Future research should continue to identify and seek solutions for external barriers to broadly increase adoption rates.",

keywords = "Adoption, Conservation, Conservation tillage, Cover crops, Crop insurance, Risk-management",

author = "Michelle Fleckenstein and Ashlyn Lythgoe and Junyu Lu and Nathan Thompson and Otto Doering and Seth Harden and Getson, {Jackie M.} and Linda Prokopy",

note = "Funding Information: Funding for this work was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA Award #: 2017-67026-26317 ). We are indebted to Laura Esman for her involvement in the survey distribution process, as well as members of the Natural Resources Social Science Lab at Purdue University for their helpful comments and feedback. Funding Information: Funding for this work was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA Award #: 2017-67026-26317). We are indebted to Laura Esman for her involvement in the survey distribution process, as well as members of the Natural Resources Social Science Lab at Purdue University for their helpful comments and feedback. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111223",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "276",

journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",

issn = "0301-4797",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crop insurance

T2 - A barrier to conservation adoption?

AU - Fleckenstein, Michelle

AU - Lythgoe, Ashlyn

AU - Lu, Junyu

AU - Thompson, Nathan

AU - Doering, Otto

AU - Harden, Seth

AU - Getson, Jackie M.

AU - Prokopy, Linda

N1 - Funding Information: Funding for this work was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA Award #: 2017-67026-26317 ). We are indebted to Laura Esman for her involvement in the survey distribution process, as well as members of the Natural Resources Social Science Lab at Purdue University for their helpful comments and feedback. Funding Information: Funding for this work was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA Award #: 2017-67026-26317). We are indebted to Laura Esman for her involvement in the survey distribution process, as well as members of the Natural Resources Social Science Lab at Purdue University for their helpful comments and feedback. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2020/12/15

Y1 - 2020/12/15

N2 - Midwest corn producers face inherent risks in their daily operations and incorporate risk-management strategies to reduce uncertainty; among these, crop insurance has dominated the agricultural landscape for decades. Previous research on conservation adoption has primarily examined the impact of individual-level characteristics on adoption, yet little is known about the impact of external factors, such as crop insurance. Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews and a multi-state survey to determine if crop insurance requirements limit cover crops and/or conservation tillage adoption for Midwest corn producers. Our findings indicate that crop insurance requirements are not a barrier to adoption. Rather, crop insurance and conservation practices serve unique - not contradictory - roles in Midwest producers’ operations and are used simultaneously. Future research should continue to identify and seek solutions for external barriers to broadly increase adoption rates.

AB - Midwest corn producers face inherent risks in their daily operations and incorporate risk-management strategies to reduce uncertainty; among these, crop insurance has dominated the agricultural landscape for decades. Previous research on conservation adoption has primarily examined the impact of individual-level characteristics on adoption, yet little is known about the impact of external factors, such as crop insurance. Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews and a multi-state survey to determine if crop insurance requirements limit cover crops and/or conservation tillage adoption for Midwest corn producers. Our findings indicate that crop insurance requirements are not a barrier to adoption. Rather, crop insurance and conservation practices serve unique - not contradictory - roles in Midwest producers’ operations and are used simultaneously. Future research should continue to identify and seek solutions for external barriers to broadly increase adoption rates.

KW - Adoption

KW - Conservation

KW - Conservation tillage

KW - Cover crops

KW - Crop insurance

KW - Risk-management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090140104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090140104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111223

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111223

M3 - Article

C2 - 32891982

AN - SCOPUS:85090140104

SN - 0301-4797

VL - 276

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

M1 - 111223

ER -

Crop insurance: A barrier to conservation adoption?

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this