Criminality, narrative and the expert witness in American biohistory

William N. Duncan, Christopher Stojanowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article considers forensic anthropologists’ roles in negotiating the concept of criminality in biohistorical cases, those investigations of the famous and infamous dead that are driven by public interest rather than traditional medicolegal relevance. We review three biohistorical cases from the United States: the purported skull of a martyred Catholic priest from sixteenth century Georgia, the Mountain Meadows Massacre that occurred in Utah in the mid-nineteenth century, and the search for Billy the Kid’s grave in New Mexico. We find that anthropologists have active and passive roles in the manufacture, assignment, and sometimes denial of criminality in these cases. Additionally we explore how the analysis and discussion of violence in these biohistorical cases reflects two concepts that are distinctive to United States’ history, notably manifest destiny and the idea of closure in historical narratives. The perception that the present order is a natural culmination of history, and that the past is truly past underestimates the relevance and impact of labelling past personages as criminals to contemporary culture. As a result, forensic anthropologists’ negotiation of criminality in U.S. biohistorical cases is fraught with nebulous ethical challenges and tangible consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-278
Number of pages16
JournalMortality
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2016

Fingerprint

Criminality
Negotiating
Expert Testimony
witness
Clergy
expert
narrative
Natural History
Violence
Skull
massacre
History
priest
sixteenth century
history
public interest
nineteenth century
Mexico
violence
present

Keywords

  • bioarchaeology
  • biohistory
  • criminality
  • forensic anthropology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Criminality, narrative and the expert witness in American biohistory. / Duncan, William N.; Stojanowski, Christopher.

In: Mortality, Vol. 21, No. 3, 02.07.2016, p. 263-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{95704bcd84b14f6ea924faa8d09390e8,
title = "Criminality, narrative and the expert witness in American biohistory",
abstract = "This article considers forensic anthropologists’ roles in negotiating the concept of criminality in biohistorical cases, those investigations of the famous and infamous dead that are driven by public interest rather than traditional medicolegal relevance. We review three biohistorical cases from the United States: the purported skull of a martyred Catholic priest from sixteenth century Georgia, the Mountain Meadows Massacre that occurred in Utah in the mid-nineteenth century, and the search for Billy the Kid’s grave in New Mexico. We find that anthropologists have active and passive roles in the manufacture, assignment, and sometimes denial of criminality in these cases. Additionally we explore how the analysis and discussion of violence in these biohistorical cases reflects two concepts that are distinctive to United States’ history, notably manifest destiny and the idea of closure in historical narratives. The perception that the present order is a natural culmination of history, and that the past is truly past underestimates the relevance and impact of labelling past personages as criminals to contemporary culture. As a result, forensic anthropologists’ negotiation of criminality in U.S. biohistorical cases is fraught with nebulous ethical challenges and tangible consequences.",
keywords = "bioarchaeology, biohistory, criminality, forensic anthropology",
author = "Duncan, {William N.} and Christopher Stojanowski",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/13576275.2016.1182261",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "263--278",
journal = "Mortality",
issn = "1357-6275",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criminality, narrative and the expert witness in American biohistory

AU - Duncan, William N.

AU - Stojanowski, Christopher

PY - 2016/7/2

Y1 - 2016/7/2

N2 - This article considers forensic anthropologists’ roles in negotiating the concept of criminality in biohistorical cases, those investigations of the famous and infamous dead that are driven by public interest rather than traditional medicolegal relevance. We review three biohistorical cases from the United States: the purported skull of a martyred Catholic priest from sixteenth century Georgia, the Mountain Meadows Massacre that occurred in Utah in the mid-nineteenth century, and the search for Billy the Kid’s grave in New Mexico. We find that anthropologists have active and passive roles in the manufacture, assignment, and sometimes denial of criminality in these cases. Additionally we explore how the analysis and discussion of violence in these biohistorical cases reflects two concepts that are distinctive to United States’ history, notably manifest destiny and the idea of closure in historical narratives. The perception that the present order is a natural culmination of history, and that the past is truly past underestimates the relevance and impact of labelling past personages as criminals to contemporary culture. As a result, forensic anthropologists’ negotiation of criminality in U.S. biohistorical cases is fraught with nebulous ethical challenges and tangible consequences.

AB - This article considers forensic anthropologists’ roles in negotiating the concept of criminality in biohistorical cases, those investigations of the famous and infamous dead that are driven by public interest rather than traditional medicolegal relevance. We review three biohistorical cases from the United States: the purported skull of a martyred Catholic priest from sixteenth century Georgia, the Mountain Meadows Massacre that occurred in Utah in the mid-nineteenth century, and the search for Billy the Kid’s grave in New Mexico. We find that anthropologists have active and passive roles in the manufacture, assignment, and sometimes denial of criminality in these cases. Additionally we explore how the analysis and discussion of violence in these biohistorical cases reflects two concepts that are distinctive to United States’ history, notably manifest destiny and the idea of closure in historical narratives. The perception that the present order is a natural culmination of history, and that the past is truly past underestimates the relevance and impact of labelling past personages as criminals to contemporary culture. As a result, forensic anthropologists’ negotiation of criminality in U.S. biohistorical cases is fraught with nebulous ethical challenges and tangible consequences.

KW - bioarchaeology

KW - biohistory

KW - criminality

KW - forensic anthropology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975261132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975261132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13576275.2016.1182261

DO - 10.1080/13576275.2016.1182261

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975261132

VL - 21

SP - 263

EP - 278

JO - Mortality

JF - Mortality

SN - 1357-6275

IS - 3

ER -