Criminal justice as an academic discipline: Costs and benefits

Vincent Webb, Dennis E. Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the stages through which any new field must pass is academic legitimation. The field of criminal justice is presently in this stage of striving for acceptance within the academic community. Recently, criticism of the field as well as legitimizing activities seem to have increased. In the course of the debate about the appropriate location and identity of criminal justice, it can be expected that the issue of disciplinary status for criminal justice will gain prominence. The issue of disciplinary status for the field of criminal justice is considered in terms of the advantages and disadvantages of disciplines. Also, assets of a multidisciplinary status are presented and "cost" comparisons are made between disciplines and multidisciplinary fields. While there seem to be points in favor of disciplines, an analysis of some of the weaknesses of disciplines suggests that continuance of a more synthetic and open approach is preferable for the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-355
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1978
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Criminal Law
Cost-Benefit Analysis
justice
costs
legitimation
assets
criticism
acceptance
Costs and Cost Analysis
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Criminal justice as an academic discipline : Costs and benefits. / Webb, Vincent; Hoffman, Dennis E.

In: Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 6, No. 4, 01.01.1978, p. 347-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{21363828a89c4f0b991f0e7f8f5601c8,
title = "Criminal justice as an academic discipline: Costs and benefits",
abstract = "One of the stages through which any new field must pass is academic legitimation. The field of criminal justice is presently in this stage of striving for acceptance within the academic community. Recently, criticism of the field as well as legitimizing activities seem to have increased. In the course of the debate about the appropriate location and identity of criminal justice, it can be expected that the issue of disciplinary status for criminal justice will gain prominence. The issue of disciplinary status for the field of criminal justice is considered in terms of the advantages and disadvantages of disciplines. Also, assets of a multidisciplinary status are presented and {"}cost{"} comparisons are made between disciplines and multidisciplinary fields. While there seem to be points in favor of disciplines, an analysis of some of the weaknesses of disciplines suggests that continuance of a more synthetic and open approach is preferable for the field.",
author = "Vincent Webb and Hoffman, {Dennis E.}",
year = "1978",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0047-2352(78)90090-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "347--355",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0047-2352",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criminal justice as an academic discipline

T2 - Costs and benefits

AU - Webb, Vincent

AU - Hoffman, Dennis E.

PY - 1978/1/1

Y1 - 1978/1/1

N2 - One of the stages through which any new field must pass is academic legitimation. The field of criminal justice is presently in this stage of striving for acceptance within the academic community. Recently, criticism of the field as well as legitimizing activities seem to have increased. In the course of the debate about the appropriate location and identity of criminal justice, it can be expected that the issue of disciplinary status for criminal justice will gain prominence. The issue of disciplinary status for the field of criminal justice is considered in terms of the advantages and disadvantages of disciplines. Also, assets of a multidisciplinary status are presented and "cost" comparisons are made between disciplines and multidisciplinary fields. While there seem to be points in favor of disciplines, an analysis of some of the weaknesses of disciplines suggests that continuance of a more synthetic and open approach is preferable for the field.

AB - One of the stages through which any new field must pass is academic legitimation. The field of criminal justice is presently in this stage of striving for acceptance within the academic community. Recently, criticism of the field as well as legitimizing activities seem to have increased. In the course of the debate about the appropriate location and identity of criminal justice, it can be expected that the issue of disciplinary status for criminal justice will gain prominence. The issue of disciplinary status for the field of criminal justice is considered in terms of the advantages and disadvantages of disciplines. Also, assets of a multidisciplinary status are presented and "cost" comparisons are made between disciplines and multidisciplinary fields. While there seem to be points in favor of disciplines, an analysis of some of the weaknesses of disciplines suggests that continuance of a more synthetic and open approach is preferable for the field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36248971875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36248971875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0047-2352(78)90090-9

DO - 10.1016/0047-2352(78)90090-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36248971875

VL - 6

SP - 347

EP - 355

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

IS - 4

ER -