Crime and the social control of blacks: Offender/victim race and the sentencing of violent offenders

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research investigating the relationship between the defendant’s race and sentence severity has not consistently supported the conflict perspective’s contention that blacks will be sentenced more harshly than whites. Although a number of studies have uncovered such a link (Spohn et al. 1981-1982; Petersilia 1983; Zatz 1984), others have found either that there are no significant racial differences (Klein et al. 1990) or that blacks are sentenced more leniently than whites (Levin 1972; Bernstein et al. 1977; Gibson 1978). The failure of research to produce uniform findings of racial discrimination in sentencing has led to conflicting conclusions. Some researchers (Hagan 1974; Kleck 1981; Pruitt and Wilson 1983) assert that racial discrimination in sentencing has declined over time and contend that the predictive power of race, once relevant legal factors are taken into account, is quite low. Others (Klepper et al. 1983; Zatz 1987) claim that discrimination has not declined or disappeared but simply has become more subtle and difficult to detect. These researchers argue that race affects sentence severity indirectly through its effect on variables such as bail status (Lizotte 1978; LaFree 1985) or type of attorney (Spohn et al. 1981-1982) or that race interacts with other variables and affects sentence severity only in particular types of cases (Barnett 1985; Spohn and Cederblom 1991) or for particular types of defendants (Peterson and Hagan 1984; Walsh 1987; LaFree 1989).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInequality, Crime, and Social Control
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages249-268
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9780429968365
ISBN (Print)9780813320052
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social control
offender
offense
racism
legal factors
bail
discrimination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Crime and the social control of blacks : Offender/victim race and the sentencing of violent offenders. / Spohn, Cassia.

Inequality, Crime, and Social Control. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 249-268.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Spohn, Cassia. / Crime and the social control of blacks : Offender/victim race and the sentencing of violent offenders. Inequality, Crime, and Social Control. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 249-268
@inbook{7dd6a32836144738a28d480dadb15ab7,
title = "Crime and the social control of blacks: Offender/victim race and the sentencing of violent offenders",
abstract = "Research investigating the relationship between the defendant’s race and sentence severity has not consistently supported the conflict perspective’s contention that blacks will be sentenced more harshly than whites. Although a number of studies have uncovered such a link (Spohn et al. 1981-1982; Petersilia 1983; Zatz 1984), others have found either that there are no significant racial differences (Klein et al. 1990) or that blacks are sentenced more leniently than whites (Levin 1972; Bernstein et al. 1977; Gibson 1978). The failure of research to produce uniform findings of racial discrimination in sentencing has led to conflicting conclusions. Some researchers (Hagan 1974; Kleck 1981; Pruitt and Wilson 1983) assert that racial discrimination in sentencing has declined over time and contend that the predictive power of race, once relevant legal factors are taken into account, is quite low. Others (Klepper et al. 1983; Zatz 1987) claim that discrimination has not declined or disappeared but simply has become more subtle and difficult to detect. These researchers argue that race affects sentence severity indirectly through its effect on variables such as bail status (Lizotte 1978; LaFree 1985) or type of attorney (Spohn et al. 1981-1982) or that race interacts with other variables and affects sentence severity only in particular types of cases (Barnett 1985; Spohn and Cederblom 1991) or for particular types of defendants (Peterson and Hagan 1984; Walsh 1987; LaFree 1989).",
author = "Cassia Spohn",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780429499814",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780813320052",
pages = "249--268",
booktitle = "Inequality, Crime, and Social Control",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Crime and the social control of blacks

T2 - Offender/victim race and the sentencing of violent offenders

AU - Spohn, Cassia

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Research investigating the relationship between the defendant’s race and sentence severity has not consistently supported the conflict perspective’s contention that blacks will be sentenced more harshly than whites. Although a number of studies have uncovered such a link (Spohn et al. 1981-1982; Petersilia 1983; Zatz 1984), others have found either that there are no significant racial differences (Klein et al. 1990) or that blacks are sentenced more leniently than whites (Levin 1972; Bernstein et al. 1977; Gibson 1978). The failure of research to produce uniform findings of racial discrimination in sentencing has led to conflicting conclusions. Some researchers (Hagan 1974; Kleck 1981; Pruitt and Wilson 1983) assert that racial discrimination in sentencing has declined over time and contend that the predictive power of race, once relevant legal factors are taken into account, is quite low. Others (Klepper et al. 1983; Zatz 1987) claim that discrimination has not declined or disappeared but simply has become more subtle and difficult to detect. These researchers argue that race affects sentence severity indirectly through its effect on variables such as bail status (Lizotte 1978; LaFree 1985) or type of attorney (Spohn et al. 1981-1982) or that race interacts with other variables and affects sentence severity only in particular types of cases (Barnett 1985; Spohn and Cederblom 1991) or for particular types of defendants (Peterson and Hagan 1984; Walsh 1987; LaFree 1989).

AB - Research investigating the relationship between the defendant’s race and sentence severity has not consistently supported the conflict perspective’s contention that blacks will be sentenced more harshly than whites. Although a number of studies have uncovered such a link (Spohn et al. 1981-1982; Petersilia 1983; Zatz 1984), others have found either that there are no significant racial differences (Klein et al. 1990) or that blacks are sentenced more leniently than whites (Levin 1972; Bernstein et al. 1977; Gibson 1978). The failure of research to produce uniform findings of racial discrimination in sentencing has led to conflicting conclusions. Some researchers (Hagan 1974; Kleck 1981; Pruitt and Wilson 1983) assert that racial discrimination in sentencing has declined over time and contend that the predictive power of race, once relevant legal factors are taken into account, is quite low. Others (Klepper et al. 1983; Zatz 1987) claim that discrimination has not declined or disappeared but simply has become more subtle and difficult to detect. These researchers argue that race affects sentence severity indirectly through its effect on variables such as bail status (Lizotte 1978; LaFree 1985) or type of attorney (Spohn et al. 1981-1982) or that race interacts with other variables and affects sentence severity only in particular types of cases (Barnett 1985; Spohn and Cederblom 1991) or for particular types of defendants (Peterson and Hagan 1984; Walsh 1987; LaFree 1989).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050717733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050717733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780429499814

DO - 10.4324/9780429499814

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85050717733

SN - 9780813320052

SP - 249

EP - 268

BT - Inequality, Crime, and Social Control

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -