Crafting the sacred

Ritual places and paraphernalia in small-scale societies

Katherine A. Spielmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The archaeological record of small-scale societies is replete with examples of people expending considerable labor to craft both places and objects for communal rituals. Archaeologists often infer these efforts to have been the product of aspiring elites. This chapter focuses instead on the larger community responsible for the construction of places and objects, through a ritual economy analysis of the social logic people use to organize the production of ritual places and paraphernalia. A review of ethnographic and archaeological data suggests that the production of communal ritual places often involves the creation of sociograms, while the production of objects for use within these places encompasses a web of complementary and competitive relations. Two examples of large-scale communal ritual spaces, the early British Neolithic causewayed enclosures and the Ohio Hopewell geometric earthworks, are explored in light of these ethnographic and archaeological patterns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-72
Number of pages36
JournalResearch in Economic Anthropology
Volume27
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

religious behavior
society
sociogram
elite
labor
economy
community
Archaeology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Crafting the sacred : Ritual places and paraphernalia in small-scale societies. / Spielmann, Katherine A.

In: Research in Economic Anthropology, Vol. 27, 2008, p. 37-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e91c789db0794522933206dca791d5c4,
title = "Crafting the sacred: Ritual places and paraphernalia in small-scale societies",
abstract = "The archaeological record of small-scale societies is replete with examples of people expending considerable labor to craft both places and objects for communal rituals. Archaeologists often infer these efforts to have been the product of aspiring elites. This chapter focuses instead on the larger community responsible for the construction of places and objects, through a ritual economy analysis of the social logic people use to organize the production of ritual places and paraphernalia. A review of ethnographic and archaeological data suggests that the production of communal ritual places often involves the creation of sociograms, while the production of objects for use within these places encompasses a web of complementary and competitive relations. Two examples of large-scale communal ritual spaces, the early British Neolithic causewayed enclosures and the Ohio Hopewell geometric earthworks, are explored in light of these ethnographic and archaeological patterns.",
author = "Spielmann, {Katherine A.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1016/S0190-1281(08)00003-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "37--72",
journal = "Research in Economic Anthropology",
issn = "0190-1281",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crafting the sacred

T2 - Ritual places and paraphernalia in small-scale societies

AU - Spielmann, Katherine A.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The archaeological record of small-scale societies is replete with examples of people expending considerable labor to craft both places and objects for communal rituals. Archaeologists often infer these efforts to have been the product of aspiring elites. This chapter focuses instead on the larger community responsible for the construction of places and objects, through a ritual economy analysis of the social logic people use to organize the production of ritual places and paraphernalia. A review of ethnographic and archaeological data suggests that the production of communal ritual places often involves the creation of sociograms, while the production of objects for use within these places encompasses a web of complementary and competitive relations. Two examples of large-scale communal ritual spaces, the early British Neolithic causewayed enclosures and the Ohio Hopewell geometric earthworks, are explored in light of these ethnographic and archaeological patterns.

AB - The archaeological record of small-scale societies is replete with examples of people expending considerable labor to craft both places and objects for communal rituals. Archaeologists often infer these efforts to have been the product of aspiring elites. This chapter focuses instead on the larger community responsible for the construction of places and objects, through a ritual economy analysis of the social logic people use to organize the production of ritual places and paraphernalia. A review of ethnographic and archaeological data suggests that the production of communal ritual places often involves the creation of sociograms, while the production of objects for use within these places encompasses a web of complementary and competitive relations. Two examples of large-scale communal ritual spaces, the early British Neolithic causewayed enclosures and the Ohio Hopewell geometric earthworks, are explored in light of these ethnographic and archaeological patterns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43449121835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43449121835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0190-1281(08)00003-6

DO - 10.1016/S0190-1281(08)00003-6

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 37

EP - 72

JO - Research in Economic Anthropology

JF - Research in Economic Anthropology

SN - 0190-1281

ER -