Covert orienting: A compound-cue account of the proportion cued effect

Evan F. Risko, Christopher Blais, Jennifer A. Stolz, Derek Besner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An increase in the proportion of spatially cued trials in the context of the covert orienting paradigm increases the magnitude of the cuing effect. This proportion cued effect is widely interpreted to reflect a form of control. Specifically, it is argued that participants strategically allocate attention as a function of the utility of the spatial cue. Here, an alternative explanation of the proportion cued effect is proposed that does not require control. According to this account, the cue-target event forms a compound cue and the proportion cued manipulation produces a relative disparity in the frequency with which particular compound cues occur. Specifically, when the proportion of spatially cued trials is increased, the frequency of spatially cued cue-target events increases and the frequency of spatially miscued cue-target events decreases, thus increasing the magnitude of the cuing effect. The results of two experiments support this account.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-127
Number of pages5
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cues
Proportion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Covert orienting : A compound-cue account of the proportion cued effect. / Risko, Evan F.; Blais, Christopher; Stolz, Jennifer A.; Besner, Derek.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.02.2008, p. 123-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Risko, Evan F. ; Blais, Christopher ; Stolz, Jennifer A. ; Besner, Derek. / Covert orienting : A compound-cue account of the proportion cued effect. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 123-127.
@article{76cc7ef1cbf54df7ab1a7881975ffc31,
title = "Covert orienting: A compound-cue account of the proportion cued effect",
abstract = "An increase in the proportion of spatially cued trials in the context of the covert orienting paradigm increases the magnitude of the cuing effect. This proportion cued effect is widely interpreted to reflect a form of control. Specifically, it is argued that participants strategically allocate attention as a function of the utility of the spatial cue. Here, an alternative explanation of the proportion cued effect is proposed that does not require control. According to this account, the cue-target event forms a compound cue and the proportion cued manipulation produces a relative disparity in the frequency with which particular compound cues occur. Specifically, when the proportion of spatially cued trials is increased, the frequency of spatially cued cue-target events increases and the frequency of spatially miscued cue-target events decreases, thus increasing the magnitude of the cuing effect. The results of two experiments support this account.",
author = "Risko, {Evan F.} and Christopher Blais and Stolz, {Jennifer A.} and Derek Besner",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/PBR.15.1.123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "123--127",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Covert orienting

T2 - A compound-cue account of the proportion cued effect

AU - Risko, Evan F.

AU - Blais, Christopher

AU - Stolz, Jennifer A.

AU - Besner, Derek

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - An increase in the proportion of spatially cued trials in the context of the covert orienting paradigm increases the magnitude of the cuing effect. This proportion cued effect is widely interpreted to reflect a form of control. Specifically, it is argued that participants strategically allocate attention as a function of the utility of the spatial cue. Here, an alternative explanation of the proportion cued effect is proposed that does not require control. According to this account, the cue-target event forms a compound cue and the proportion cued manipulation produces a relative disparity in the frequency with which particular compound cues occur. Specifically, when the proportion of spatially cued trials is increased, the frequency of spatially cued cue-target events increases and the frequency of spatially miscued cue-target events decreases, thus increasing the magnitude of the cuing effect. The results of two experiments support this account.

AB - An increase in the proportion of spatially cued trials in the context of the covert orienting paradigm increases the magnitude of the cuing effect. This proportion cued effect is widely interpreted to reflect a form of control. Specifically, it is argued that participants strategically allocate attention as a function of the utility of the spatial cue. Here, an alternative explanation of the proportion cued effect is proposed that does not require control. According to this account, the cue-target event forms a compound cue and the proportion cued manipulation produces a relative disparity in the frequency with which particular compound cues occur. Specifically, when the proportion of spatially cued trials is increased, the frequency of spatially cued cue-target events increases and the frequency of spatially miscued cue-target events decreases, thus increasing the magnitude of the cuing effect. The results of two experiments support this account.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50949094900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50949094900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/PBR.15.1.123

DO - 10.3758/PBR.15.1.123

M3 - Article

C2 - 18605491

AN - SCOPUS:50949094900

VL - 15

SP - 123

EP - 127

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 1

ER -