Cover of tall trees best predicts California spotted owl habitat

Malcolm P. North, Jonathan T. Kane, Van R. Kane, Gregory P. Asner, William Berigan, Derek J. Churchill, Scott Conway, R. J. Gutiérrez, Sean Jeronimo, John Keane, Alexander Koltunov, Tina Mark, Monika Moskal, Thomas Munton, Zachary Peery, Carlos Ramirez, Rahel Sollmann, Angela M. White, Sheila Whitmore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Restoration of western dry forests in the USA often focuses on reducing fuel loads. In the range of the spotted owl, these treatments may reduce canopy cover and tree density, which could reduce preferred habitat conditions for the owl and other sensitive species. In particular, high canopy cover (≥70%) has been widely reported to be an important feature of spotted owl habitat, but averages of stand-level forest cover do not provide important information on foliage height and gap structure. To provide better quantification of canopy structure, we used airborne LiDAR imagery to identify canopy cover in different height strata and the size and frequency of gaps that were associated with owl nest sites, protected activity centers (PACs), and territories within four study areas and 316 owl territories. Although total canopy cover was high in nest stands and PAC areas, the cover in tall (>48 m) trees was the canopy structure most highly selected for, while cover in lower strata (2–16 m) was avoided compared to availability in the surrounding landscape. Tall tree cover gradually decreased and lower strata cover increased as distance increased from the nest. Large (>1000 m2) gaps were not found near nests, but otherwise there was no difference in gap frequencies and sizes between PACs and territories and the surrounding landscape. Using cluster analysis we classified canopy conditions into 5 structural classes and 4 levels of canopy cover to assess the relationship between total canopy cover and tree size within nest sites, PACs, and territories. High canopy cover (≥70%) mostly occurs when large tree cover is high, indicating the two variables are often confounded. Our results suggest that the cover of tall trees may be a better predictor of owl habitat than total canopy cover because the latter can include cover in the 2–16 m strata – conditions that owls actually avoid. Management strategies designed to preserve and facilitate the growth of tall trees while reducing the cover and density of understory trees may improve forest resilience to drought and wildfire while also maintaining or promoting the characteristics of owl habitat.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-178
Number of pages13
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume405
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Strigiformes
canopy
habitat
habitats
nests
forest canopy
nest
nesting sites
nest site
airborne sensing
dry forests
wildfires
understory
dry forest
preserves
cluster analysis
forest cover
wildfire
foliage
drought

Keywords

  • Canopy cover
  • Fire suppression
  • Forest gaps
  • Mixed conifer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

North, M. P., Kane, J. T., Kane, V. R., Asner, G. P., Berigan, W., Churchill, D. J., ... Whitmore, S. (2017). Cover of tall trees best predicts California spotted owl habitat. Forest Ecology and Management, 405, 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.019

Cover of tall trees best predicts California spotted owl habitat. / North, Malcolm P.; Kane, Jonathan T.; Kane, Van R.; Asner, Gregory P.; Berigan, William; Churchill, Derek J.; Conway, Scott; Gutiérrez, R. J.; Jeronimo, Sean; Keane, John; Koltunov, Alexander; Mark, Tina; Moskal, Monika; Munton, Thomas; Peery, Zachary; Ramirez, Carlos; Sollmann, Rahel; White, Angela M.; Whitmore, Sheila.

In: Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 405, 01.12.2017, p. 166-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

North, MP, Kane, JT, Kane, VR, Asner, GP, Berigan, W, Churchill, DJ, Conway, S, Gutiérrez, RJ, Jeronimo, S, Keane, J, Koltunov, A, Mark, T, Moskal, M, Munton, T, Peery, Z, Ramirez, C, Sollmann, R, White, AM & Whitmore, S 2017, 'Cover of tall trees best predicts California spotted owl habitat', Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 405, pp. 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.019
North, Malcolm P. ; Kane, Jonathan T. ; Kane, Van R. ; Asner, Gregory P. ; Berigan, William ; Churchill, Derek J. ; Conway, Scott ; Gutiérrez, R. J. ; Jeronimo, Sean ; Keane, John ; Koltunov, Alexander ; Mark, Tina ; Moskal, Monika ; Munton, Thomas ; Peery, Zachary ; Ramirez, Carlos ; Sollmann, Rahel ; White, Angela M. ; Whitmore, Sheila. / Cover of tall trees best predicts California spotted owl habitat. In: Forest Ecology and Management. 2017 ; Vol. 405. pp. 166-178.
@article{fd0d87c287854d4496b85062d38b4422,
title = "Cover of tall trees best predicts California spotted owl habitat",
abstract = "Restoration of western dry forests in the USA often focuses on reducing fuel loads. In the range of the spotted owl, these treatments may reduce canopy cover and tree density, which could reduce preferred habitat conditions for the owl and other sensitive species. In particular, high canopy cover (≥70{\%}) has been widely reported to be an important feature of spotted owl habitat, but averages of stand-level forest cover do not provide important information on foliage height and gap structure. To provide better quantification of canopy structure, we used airborne LiDAR imagery to identify canopy cover in different height strata and the size and frequency of gaps that were associated with owl nest sites, protected activity centers (PACs), and territories within four study areas and 316 owl territories. Although total canopy cover was high in nest stands and PAC areas, the cover in tall (>48 m) trees was the canopy structure most highly selected for, while cover in lower strata (2–16 m) was avoided compared to availability in the surrounding landscape. Tall tree cover gradually decreased and lower strata cover increased as distance increased from the nest. Large (>1000 m2) gaps were not found near nests, but otherwise there was no difference in gap frequencies and sizes between PACs and territories and the surrounding landscape. Using cluster analysis we classified canopy conditions into 5 structural classes and 4 levels of canopy cover to assess the relationship between total canopy cover and tree size within nest sites, PACs, and territories. High canopy cover (≥70{\%}) mostly occurs when large tree cover is high, indicating the two variables are often confounded. Our results suggest that the cover of tall trees may be a better predictor of owl habitat than total canopy cover because the latter can include cover in the 2–16 m strata – conditions that owls actually avoid. Management strategies designed to preserve and facilitate the growth of tall trees while reducing the cover and density of understory trees may improve forest resilience to drought and wildfire while also maintaining or promoting the characteristics of owl habitat.",
keywords = "Canopy cover, Fire suppression, Forest gaps, Mixed conifer",
author = "North, {Malcolm P.} and Kane, {Jonathan T.} and Kane, {Van R.} and Asner, {Gregory P.} and William Berigan and Churchill, {Derek J.} and Scott Conway and Guti{\'e}rrez, {R. J.} and Sean Jeronimo and John Keane and Alexander Koltunov and Tina Mark and Monika Moskal and Thomas Munton and Zachary Peery and Carlos Ramirez and Rahel Sollmann and White, {Angela M.} and Sheila Whitmore",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "405",
pages = "166--178",
journal = "Forest Ecology and Management",
issn = "0378-1127",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cover of tall trees best predicts California spotted owl habitat

AU - North, Malcolm P.

AU - Kane, Jonathan T.

AU - Kane, Van R.

AU - Asner, Gregory P.

AU - Berigan, William

AU - Churchill, Derek J.

AU - Conway, Scott

AU - Gutiérrez, R. J.

AU - Jeronimo, Sean

AU - Keane, John

AU - Koltunov, Alexander

AU - Mark, Tina

AU - Moskal, Monika

AU - Munton, Thomas

AU - Peery, Zachary

AU - Ramirez, Carlos

AU - Sollmann, Rahel

AU - White, Angela M.

AU - Whitmore, Sheila

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Restoration of western dry forests in the USA often focuses on reducing fuel loads. In the range of the spotted owl, these treatments may reduce canopy cover and tree density, which could reduce preferred habitat conditions for the owl and other sensitive species. In particular, high canopy cover (≥70%) has been widely reported to be an important feature of spotted owl habitat, but averages of stand-level forest cover do not provide important information on foliage height and gap structure. To provide better quantification of canopy structure, we used airborne LiDAR imagery to identify canopy cover in different height strata and the size and frequency of gaps that were associated with owl nest sites, protected activity centers (PACs), and territories within four study areas and 316 owl territories. Although total canopy cover was high in nest stands and PAC areas, the cover in tall (>48 m) trees was the canopy structure most highly selected for, while cover in lower strata (2–16 m) was avoided compared to availability in the surrounding landscape. Tall tree cover gradually decreased and lower strata cover increased as distance increased from the nest. Large (>1000 m2) gaps were not found near nests, but otherwise there was no difference in gap frequencies and sizes between PACs and territories and the surrounding landscape. Using cluster analysis we classified canopy conditions into 5 structural classes and 4 levels of canopy cover to assess the relationship between total canopy cover and tree size within nest sites, PACs, and territories. High canopy cover (≥70%) mostly occurs when large tree cover is high, indicating the two variables are often confounded. Our results suggest that the cover of tall trees may be a better predictor of owl habitat than total canopy cover because the latter can include cover in the 2–16 m strata – conditions that owls actually avoid. Management strategies designed to preserve and facilitate the growth of tall trees while reducing the cover and density of understory trees may improve forest resilience to drought and wildfire while also maintaining or promoting the characteristics of owl habitat.

AB - Restoration of western dry forests in the USA often focuses on reducing fuel loads. In the range of the spotted owl, these treatments may reduce canopy cover and tree density, which could reduce preferred habitat conditions for the owl and other sensitive species. In particular, high canopy cover (≥70%) has been widely reported to be an important feature of spotted owl habitat, but averages of stand-level forest cover do not provide important information on foliage height and gap structure. To provide better quantification of canopy structure, we used airborne LiDAR imagery to identify canopy cover in different height strata and the size and frequency of gaps that were associated with owl nest sites, protected activity centers (PACs), and territories within four study areas and 316 owl territories. Although total canopy cover was high in nest stands and PAC areas, the cover in tall (>48 m) trees was the canopy structure most highly selected for, while cover in lower strata (2–16 m) was avoided compared to availability in the surrounding landscape. Tall tree cover gradually decreased and lower strata cover increased as distance increased from the nest. Large (>1000 m2) gaps were not found near nests, but otherwise there was no difference in gap frequencies and sizes between PACs and territories and the surrounding landscape. Using cluster analysis we classified canopy conditions into 5 structural classes and 4 levels of canopy cover to assess the relationship between total canopy cover and tree size within nest sites, PACs, and territories. High canopy cover (≥70%) mostly occurs when large tree cover is high, indicating the two variables are often confounded. Our results suggest that the cover of tall trees may be a better predictor of owl habitat than total canopy cover because the latter can include cover in the 2–16 m strata – conditions that owls actually avoid. Management strategies designed to preserve and facilitate the growth of tall trees while reducing the cover and density of understory trees may improve forest resilience to drought and wildfire while also maintaining or promoting the characteristics of owl habitat.

KW - Canopy cover

KW - Fire suppression

KW - Forest gaps

KW - Mixed conifer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029579030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029579030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.019

DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029579030

VL - 405

SP - 166

EP - 178

JO - Forest Ecology and Management

JF - Forest Ecology and Management

SN - 0378-1127

ER -