Course, program, and curriculum gaps

Assessing curricula for targeted change

Barbara D. Gannod, Gerald C. Gannod, Mark Henderson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the Spring Semester of 2004, a gap analysis team at Arizona State University analyzed the impact of a significantly funded curriculum development program targeted at improving the abilities of interns and fresh graduates to develop embedded systems. To assist in this endeavor, the team identified three criteria for characterizing gaps between a desired and actual curriculum. In the past, the curriculum development program had been introducing new courses (targeting Curriculum Gap) in an attempt to update curriculum. However, due to program constraints, students were essentially unaffected by the curriculum changes (a Program Gap). It was determined that Course Gaps were the least problematic gaps to address in the short term and had a high impact on interns and graduates of the programs. This paper describes the set of criteria that we have developed for classifying different kinds of gaps and the process used in both gathering data and assessing a program to affect curriculum improvement. Specifically, we demonstrate that curriculum change requires a disciplined and systematic methodology that goes beyond simply adding new courses. Finally, we describe our experiences in applying gap classification and the impact of the gap analysis upon the curriculum program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
Volume2005
StatePublished - 2005
EventFrontiers in Education - 35th Annual Conference 2005, FIE' 05 - Indianapolis, IN, United States
Duration: Oct 19 2005Oct 22 2005

Other

OtherFrontiers in Education - 35th Annual Conference 2005, FIE' 05
CountryUnited States
CityIndianapolis, IN
Period10/19/0510/22/05

Fingerprint

Curricula
Embedded systems
Students

Keywords

  • ABET constituents
  • Accreditation
  • Assessment
  • Curriculum reform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Gannod, B. D., Gannod, G. C., & Henderson, M. (2005). Course, program, and curriculum gaps: Assessing curricula for targeted change. In Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE (Vol. 2005). [1611930]

Course, program, and curriculum gaps : Assessing curricula for targeted change. / Gannod, Barbara D.; Gannod, Gerald C.; Henderson, Mark.

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. Vol. 2005 2005. 1611930.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Gannod, BD, Gannod, GC & Henderson, M 2005, Course, program, and curriculum gaps: Assessing curricula for targeted change. in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. vol. 2005, 1611930, Frontiers in Education - 35th Annual Conference 2005, FIE' 05, Indianapolis, IN, United States, 10/19/05.
Gannod BD, Gannod GC, Henderson M. Course, program, and curriculum gaps: Assessing curricula for targeted change. In Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. Vol. 2005. 2005. 1611930
Gannod, Barbara D. ; Gannod, Gerald C. ; Henderson, Mark. / Course, program, and curriculum gaps : Assessing curricula for targeted change. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. Vol. 2005 2005.
@inproceedings{13850c63a88446afa4dc231270eca781,
title = "Course, program, and curriculum gaps: Assessing curricula for targeted change",
abstract = "In the Spring Semester of 2004, a gap analysis team at Arizona State University analyzed the impact of a significantly funded curriculum development program targeted at improving the abilities of interns and fresh graduates to develop embedded systems. To assist in this endeavor, the team identified three criteria for characterizing gaps between a desired and actual curriculum. In the past, the curriculum development program had been introducing new courses (targeting Curriculum Gap) in an attempt to update curriculum. However, due to program constraints, students were essentially unaffected by the curriculum changes (a Program Gap). It was determined that Course Gaps were the least problematic gaps to address in the short term and had a high impact on interns and graduates of the programs. This paper describes the set of criteria that we have developed for classifying different kinds of gaps and the process used in both gathering data and assessing a program to affect curriculum improvement. Specifically, we demonstrate that curriculum change requires a disciplined and systematic methodology that goes beyond simply adding new courses. Finally, we describe our experiences in applying gap classification and the impact of the gap analysis upon the curriculum program.",
keywords = "ABET constituents, Accreditation, Assessment, Curriculum reform",
author = "Gannod, {Barbara D.} and Gannod, {Gerald C.} and Mark Henderson",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0780390776",
volume = "2005",
booktitle = "Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Course, program, and curriculum gaps

T2 - Assessing curricula for targeted change

AU - Gannod, Barbara D.

AU - Gannod, Gerald C.

AU - Henderson, Mark

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In the Spring Semester of 2004, a gap analysis team at Arizona State University analyzed the impact of a significantly funded curriculum development program targeted at improving the abilities of interns and fresh graduates to develop embedded systems. To assist in this endeavor, the team identified three criteria for characterizing gaps between a desired and actual curriculum. In the past, the curriculum development program had been introducing new courses (targeting Curriculum Gap) in an attempt to update curriculum. However, due to program constraints, students were essentially unaffected by the curriculum changes (a Program Gap). It was determined that Course Gaps were the least problematic gaps to address in the short term and had a high impact on interns and graduates of the programs. This paper describes the set of criteria that we have developed for classifying different kinds of gaps and the process used in both gathering data and assessing a program to affect curriculum improvement. Specifically, we demonstrate that curriculum change requires a disciplined and systematic methodology that goes beyond simply adding new courses. Finally, we describe our experiences in applying gap classification and the impact of the gap analysis upon the curriculum program.

AB - In the Spring Semester of 2004, a gap analysis team at Arizona State University analyzed the impact of a significantly funded curriculum development program targeted at improving the abilities of interns and fresh graduates to develop embedded systems. To assist in this endeavor, the team identified three criteria for characterizing gaps between a desired and actual curriculum. In the past, the curriculum development program had been introducing new courses (targeting Curriculum Gap) in an attempt to update curriculum. However, due to program constraints, students were essentially unaffected by the curriculum changes (a Program Gap). It was determined that Course Gaps were the least problematic gaps to address in the short term and had a high impact on interns and graduates of the programs. This paper describes the set of criteria that we have developed for classifying different kinds of gaps and the process used in both gathering data and assessing a program to affect curriculum improvement. Specifically, we demonstrate that curriculum change requires a disciplined and systematic methodology that goes beyond simply adding new courses. Finally, we describe our experiences in applying gap classification and the impact of the gap analysis upon the curriculum program.

KW - ABET constituents

KW - Accreditation

KW - Assessment

KW - Curriculum reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947273718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947273718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0780390776

SN - 9780780390775

VL - 2005

BT - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

ER -