Cost penalties of near-optimal scheduling control of BCHP dystems

Part i - Selection of case study scenarios and data generation

Itzhak Maor, T Agami Reddy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is the first of two papers which reports the research findings of an ASHRAE-funded project that assessed the impact in energy reduction and cost savings of optimal versus near-optimal operation of building combined heat and power (BCHP) plants. The optimal operation of these plants requires more careful and sophisticated equipment scheduling and control methods compared to those in industrial combined heat and power (CHP) plants due to the large variability in thermal and electric loads as well as the equipment scheduling issue. This paper describes the methodology adopted in selecting representative building types and geographic climates; performing careful design and sizing of the BCHP systems and equipment; using a detailed simulation program to generate hourly loads throughout the year; and, finally, selecting specific days during which to evaluate the penalty associated with near-optimal control as opposed to optimal. Seven buildings have been selected: three large buildings under real-time electrical pricing (hospital, school, and hotel) and four buildings (two large and two small) under time-of-use rates. A companion paper reports on the results of the optimization study in terms of the cost penalty ratios associated with nearoptimal versus optimal operation of the BCHP plants for each of the numerous specific scenarios described in this paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationASHRAE Transactions
Pages271-286
Number of pages16
Volume115 PART 1
StatePublished - 2009
Event2009 ASHRAE Winter Conference - Chicago, IL, United States
Duration: Jan 25 2009Jan 28 2009

Other

Other2009 ASHRAE Winter Conference
CountryUnited States
CityChicago, IL
Period1/25/091/28/09

Fingerprint

Cogeneration plants
Scheduling
Electric loads
Costs
Hotels
Thermal load
Hot Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Cost penalties of near-optimal scheduling control of BCHP dystems : Part i - Selection of case study scenarios and data generation. / Maor, Itzhak; Reddy, T Agami.

ASHRAE Transactions. Vol. 115 PART 1 2009. p. 271-286.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Maor, I & Reddy, TA 2009, Cost penalties of near-optimal scheduling control of BCHP dystems: Part i - Selection of case study scenarios and data generation. in ASHRAE Transactions. vol. 115 PART 1, pp. 271-286, 2009 ASHRAE Winter Conference, Chicago, IL, United States, 1/25/09.
@inproceedings{03e056b9056641c381b459349151d329,
title = "Cost penalties of near-optimal scheduling control of BCHP dystems: Part i - Selection of case study scenarios and data generation",
abstract = "This paper is the first of two papers which reports the research findings of an ASHRAE-funded project that assessed the impact in energy reduction and cost savings of optimal versus near-optimal operation of building combined heat and power (BCHP) plants. The optimal operation of these plants requires more careful and sophisticated equipment scheduling and control methods compared to those in industrial combined heat and power (CHP) plants due to the large variability in thermal and electric loads as well as the equipment scheduling issue. This paper describes the methodology adopted in selecting representative building types and geographic climates; performing careful design and sizing of the BCHP systems and equipment; using a detailed simulation program to generate hourly loads throughout the year; and, finally, selecting specific days during which to evaluate the penalty associated with near-optimal control as opposed to optimal. Seven buildings have been selected: three large buildings under real-time electrical pricing (hospital, school, and hotel) and four buildings (two large and two small) under time-of-use rates. A companion paper reports on the results of the optimization study in terms of the cost penalty ratios associated with nearoptimal versus optimal operation of the BCHP plants for each of the numerous specific scenarios described in this paper.",
author = "Itzhak Maor and Reddy, {T Agami}",
year = "2009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115 PART 1",
pages = "271--286",
booktitle = "ASHRAE Transactions",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Cost penalties of near-optimal scheduling control of BCHP dystems

T2 - Part i - Selection of case study scenarios and data generation

AU - Maor, Itzhak

AU - Reddy, T Agami

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This paper is the first of two papers which reports the research findings of an ASHRAE-funded project that assessed the impact in energy reduction and cost savings of optimal versus near-optimal operation of building combined heat and power (BCHP) plants. The optimal operation of these plants requires more careful and sophisticated equipment scheduling and control methods compared to those in industrial combined heat and power (CHP) plants due to the large variability in thermal and electric loads as well as the equipment scheduling issue. This paper describes the methodology adopted in selecting representative building types and geographic climates; performing careful design and sizing of the BCHP systems and equipment; using a detailed simulation program to generate hourly loads throughout the year; and, finally, selecting specific days during which to evaluate the penalty associated with near-optimal control as opposed to optimal. Seven buildings have been selected: three large buildings under real-time electrical pricing (hospital, school, and hotel) and four buildings (two large and two small) under time-of-use rates. A companion paper reports on the results of the optimization study in terms of the cost penalty ratios associated with nearoptimal versus optimal operation of the BCHP plants for each of the numerous specific scenarios described in this paper.

AB - This paper is the first of two papers which reports the research findings of an ASHRAE-funded project that assessed the impact in energy reduction and cost savings of optimal versus near-optimal operation of building combined heat and power (BCHP) plants. The optimal operation of these plants requires more careful and sophisticated equipment scheduling and control methods compared to those in industrial combined heat and power (CHP) plants due to the large variability in thermal and electric loads as well as the equipment scheduling issue. This paper describes the methodology adopted in selecting representative building types and geographic climates; performing careful design and sizing of the BCHP systems and equipment; using a detailed simulation program to generate hourly loads throughout the year; and, finally, selecting specific days during which to evaluate the penalty associated with near-optimal control as opposed to optimal. Seven buildings have been selected: three large buildings under real-time electrical pricing (hospital, school, and hotel) and four buildings (two large and two small) under time-of-use rates. A companion paper reports on the results of the optimization study in terms of the cost penalty ratios associated with nearoptimal versus optimal operation of the BCHP plants for each of the numerous specific scenarios described in this paper.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449509322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449509322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 115 PART 1

SP - 271

EP - 286

BT - ASHRAE Transactions

ER -