Cost-effectiveness studies of medical and chiropractic care for occupational low back pain: A critical review of the literature

Marjorie Baldwin, Pierre Côté, John W. Frank, William Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background context: Back pain is the single most costly work-related injury. Chiropractors and physicians are the main primary care providers for occupational low back pain (OLBP), but there is no consensus regarding the relative cost-effectiveness of these two modes of care. Purpose: To critically appraise and synthesize recent literature on the cost-effectiveness of medical and chiropractic care for OLBP, and to propose a cost-effectiveness methodology that integrates epidemiologic and economic methods for future studies. Study design: Literature review. MEDLINE was searched from 1990 through 1999. Nine articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The methodological quality of the articles was critically appraised independently by two epidemiologists using standardized review criteria. Two health economists reviewed the studies on cost-effectiveness. Results: The current literature suggests that chiropractors and physicians provide equally effective care for OLBP but that chiropractic patients are more satisfied with their care. Evidence on the relative costs of medical and chiropractic care is conflicting. Several methodological deficiencies limit the validity of the reviewed studies. No studies combine high-quality cost data with adequate sample sizes and controls for confounding factors. Conclusion: Existing studies fail to clarify whether medical or chiropractic care is more cost effective. We suggest that future studies must combine epidemiologic and economic methods to answer the question adequately.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-147
Number of pages10
JournalSpine Journal
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2001

Fingerprint

Chiropractic
Low Back Pain
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Epidemiologic Methods
Economics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Primary Care Physicians
Back Pain
MEDLINE
Health Care Costs
Sample Size
Physicians
Health
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Chiropractic medicine
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Occupational low back pain
  • Work disability
  • Work-related injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Cost-effectiveness studies of medical and chiropractic care for occupational low back pain : A critical review of the literature. / Baldwin, Marjorie; Côté, Pierre; Frank, John W.; Johnson, William.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, 03.2001, p. 138-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a197103f84a426e864dfaa9d28293ac,
title = "Cost-effectiveness studies of medical and chiropractic care for occupational low back pain: A critical review of the literature",
abstract = "Background context: Back pain is the single most costly work-related injury. Chiropractors and physicians are the main primary care providers for occupational low back pain (OLBP), but there is no consensus regarding the relative cost-effectiveness of these two modes of care. Purpose: To critically appraise and synthesize recent literature on the cost-effectiveness of medical and chiropractic care for OLBP, and to propose a cost-effectiveness methodology that integrates epidemiologic and economic methods for future studies. Study design: Literature review. MEDLINE was searched from 1990 through 1999. Nine articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The methodological quality of the articles was critically appraised independently by two epidemiologists using standardized review criteria. Two health economists reviewed the studies on cost-effectiveness. Results: The current literature suggests that chiropractors and physicians provide equally effective care for OLBP but that chiropractic patients are more satisfied with their care. Evidence on the relative costs of medical and chiropractic care is conflicting. Several methodological deficiencies limit the validity of the reviewed studies. No studies combine high-quality cost data with adequate sample sizes and controls for confounding factors. Conclusion: Existing studies fail to clarify whether medical or chiropractic care is more cost effective. We suggest that future studies must combine epidemiologic and economic methods to answer the question adequately.",
keywords = "Chiropractic medicine, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Occupational low back pain, Work disability, Work-related injury",
author = "Marjorie Baldwin and Pierre C{\^o}t{\'e} and Frank, {John W.} and William Johnson",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00016-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "138--147",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness studies of medical and chiropractic care for occupational low back pain

T2 - A critical review of the literature

AU - Baldwin, Marjorie

AU - Côté, Pierre

AU - Frank, John W.

AU - Johnson, William

PY - 2001/3

Y1 - 2001/3

N2 - Background context: Back pain is the single most costly work-related injury. Chiropractors and physicians are the main primary care providers for occupational low back pain (OLBP), but there is no consensus regarding the relative cost-effectiveness of these two modes of care. Purpose: To critically appraise and synthesize recent literature on the cost-effectiveness of medical and chiropractic care for OLBP, and to propose a cost-effectiveness methodology that integrates epidemiologic and economic methods for future studies. Study design: Literature review. MEDLINE was searched from 1990 through 1999. Nine articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The methodological quality of the articles was critically appraised independently by two epidemiologists using standardized review criteria. Two health economists reviewed the studies on cost-effectiveness. Results: The current literature suggests that chiropractors and physicians provide equally effective care for OLBP but that chiropractic patients are more satisfied with their care. Evidence on the relative costs of medical and chiropractic care is conflicting. Several methodological deficiencies limit the validity of the reviewed studies. No studies combine high-quality cost data with adequate sample sizes and controls for confounding factors. Conclusion: Existing studies fail to clarify whether medical or chiropractic care is more cost effective. We suggest that future studies must combine epidemiologic and economic methods to answer the question adequately.

AB - Background context: Back pain is the single most costly work-related injury. Chiropractors and physicians are the main primary care providers for occupational low back pain (OLBP), but there is no consensus regarding the relative cost-effectiveness of these two modes of care. Purpose: To critically appraise and synthesize recent literature on the cost-effectiveness of medical and chiropractic care for OLBP, and to propose a cost-effectiveness methodology that integrates epidemiologic and economic methods for future studies. Study design: Literature review. MEDLINE was searched from 1990 through 1999. Nine articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The methodological quality of the articles was critically appraised independently by two epidemiologists using standardized review criteria. Two health economists reviewed the studies on cost-effectiveness. Results: The current literature suggests that chiropractors and physicians provide equally effective care for OLBP but that chiropractic patients are more satisfied with their care. Evidence on the relative costs of medical and chiropractic care is conflicting. Several methodological deficiencies limit the validity of the reviewed studies. No studies combine high-quality cost data with adequate sample sizes and controls for confounding factors. Conclusion: Existing studies fail to clarify whether medical or chiropractic care is more cost effective. We suggest that future studies must combine epidemiologic and economic methods to answer the question adequately.

KW - Chiropractic medicine

KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - Occupational low back pain

KW - Work disability

KW - Work-related injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18044404151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18044404151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00016-X

DO - 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00016-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 14588394

AN - SCOPUS:18044404151

VL - 1

SP - 138

EP - 147

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 2

ER -