Cost-based evaluations of the treatment of back pain: A primer for health-care professionals

William Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background context: There is an extensive literature on the costs of back pain and on cost-based evaluations of the effectiveness of alternative modes of care for back pain. An understanding of the adequacy of a study often requires information that is not part of the experience or training of health-care professionals. The article seeks to provide clinicians with some criteria by which to judge the validity of cost-based evaluations of the treatment and consequences of back pain. Purpose: This article is not a comprehensive, critical review of the research literature on the costs of back pain or the relative cost-effectiveness of different methods of care for back pain. It presents, instead, a discussion of some important characteristics of cost-related studies of back pain and some criteria that can be used to evaluate the validity of cost estimates and cost-effectiveness analyses related to back pain. Study design: A guide for the evaluation of cost-based studies of back pain. Methods: A summary of criteria for the evaluation of the validity of cost-based studies of back pain. Results: Three sets of criteria for evaluation, ranked from most important to least important. Conclusions: Application of the suggested criteria can enhance the ability of health-care professionals to better understand the limits and relative adequacy of cost-based studies of back pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-369
Number of pages9
JournalSpine Journal
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2005

Keywords

  • Back pain cost studies
  • Cost-based evaluations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-based evaluations of the treatment of back pain: A primer for health-care professionals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this