Corrections

Effects of Buffer pH on Electroosmotic Flow Control by an Applied Radial Voltage for Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (Anal. Chem. (1993) 65(1) (27–31) (10.1021/ac00049a007))

Mark Hayes, Indu Kheterpal, Andrew G. Ewing

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Equation 3 is incorrect. It should read [formula omitted] where No is the number concentration of counterions at the surface, not the viscosity. The terms for the elementary charge (e) and the permittivity of the buffer (et,) have been defined according to more conventional symbols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalAnalytical Chemistry
Volume65
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electrophoresis
Flow control
Buffers
Permittivity
Viscosity
Electric potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry

Cite this

@article{4afdba64c97c4edcaa869fadc6b307d1,
title = "Corrections: Effects of Buffer pH on Electroosmotic Flow Control by an Applied Radial Voltage for Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (Anal. Chem. (1993) 65(1) (27–31) (10.1021/ac00049a007))",
abstract = "Equation 3 is incorrect. It should read [formula omitted] where No is the number concentration of counterions at the surface, not the viscosity. The terms for the elementary charge (e) and the permittivity of the buffer (et,) have been defined according to more conventional symbols.",
author = "Mark Hayes and Indu Kheterpal and Ewing, {Andrew G.}",
year = "1993",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1021/ac00065a601",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
journal = "Analytical Chemistry",
issn = "0003-2700",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrections

T2 - Effects of Buffer pH on Electroosmotic Flow Control by an Applied Radial Voltage for Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (Anal. Chem. (1993) 65(1) (27–31) (10.1021/ac00049a007))

AU - Hayes, Mark

AU - Kheterpal, Indu

AU - Ewing, Andrew G.

PY - 1993/9/1

Y1 - 1993/9/1

N2 - Equation 3 is incorrect. It should read [formula omitted] where No is the number concentration of counterions at the surface, not the viscosity. The terms for the elementary charge (e) and the permittivity of the buffer (et,) have been defined according to more conventional symbols.

AB - Equation 3 is incorrect. It should read [formula omitted] where No is the number concentration of counterions at the surface, not the viscosity. The terms for the elementary charge (e) and the permittivity of the buffer (et,) have been defined according to more conventional symbols.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16944365688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16944365688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ac00065a601

DO - 10.1021/ac00065a601

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 65

JO - Analytical Chemistry

JF - Analytical Chemistry

SN - 0003-2700

IS - 17

ER -