Abstract
Page 6059. Equation 3 in the initially published version of this paper,1 (Formula Presented) Page 6063. The caption of Figure 12 in the initially published version of this paper1 is incorrect; the identifications for XRD patterns (a) and (b) have been switched. The correct caption should read as follows: Figure 12. XRD pattern of LSCF1991 of (a) sample quenched from fixed-bed at 600 °C, (b) in situ in vacuum at high temperature at 600 °C (brownmillerite), and (c) fresh sample in air at room temperature (perovskite). The peak present in (a) at 2θ = 20° resulted from the polymer vacuum dome of high temperature setup.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Jan 9 2019 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Chemistry(all)
- Chemical Engineering(all)
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Cite this
Correction to : Effects of oxygen vacancy order-disorder phase transition on air separation by perovskite sorbents (Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research (2017) 56:20 (6057-6064) DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00461). / Wu, Han Chun; Lin, Jerry.
In: Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 58, No. 1, 09.01.2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction to
T2 - Effects of oxygen vacancy order-disorder phase transition on air separation by perovskite sorbents (Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research (2017) 56:20 (6057-6064) DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00461)
AU - Wu, Han Chun
AU - Lin, Jerry
PY - 2019/1/9
Y1 - 2019/1/9
N2 - Page 6059. Equation 3 in the initially published version of this paper,1 (Formula Presented) Page 6063. The caption of Figure 12 in the initially published version of this paper1 is incorrect; the identifications for XRD patterns (a) and (b) have been switched. The correct caption should read as follows: Figure 12. XRD pattern of LSCF1991 of (a) sample quenched from fixed-bed at 600 °C, (b) in situ in vacuum at high temperature at 600 °C (brownmillerite), and (c) fresh sample in air at room temperature (perovskite). The peak present in (a) at 2θ = 20° resulted from the polymer vacuum dome of high temperature setup.
AB - Page 6059. Equation 3 in the initially published version of this paper,1 (Formula Presented) Page 6063. The caption of Figure 12 in the initially published version of this paper1 is incorrect; the identifications for XRD patterns (a) and (b) have been switched. The correct caption should read as follows: Figure 12. XRD pattern of LSCF1991 of (a) sample quenched from fixed-bed at 600 °C, (b) in situ in vacuum at high temperature at 600 °C (brownmillerite), and (c) fresh sample in air at room temperature (perovskite). The peak present in (a) at 2θ = 20° resulted from the polymer vacuum dome of high temperature setup.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059904727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059904727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b06099
DO - 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b06099
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 58
JO - Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
JF - Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
SN - 0888-5885
IS - 1
ER -