Corporate Reputation: Being Good and Looking Good

Rosa Chun; Antonio Argandoña; Christine Choirat; Donald Siegel

doi:10.1177/0007650319826520

Corporate Reputation: Being Good and Looking Good

Rosa Chun, Antonio Argandoña, Christine Choirat, Donald Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article introduces the special issue on “Corporate Reputation: Being Good and Looking Good.” Three of the five included articles help to reinforce a conclusion that “being good” and “looking good” are not dichotomous, mutually exclusive conditions. Rather, the two dimensions are linked in some kind of causal relationship for which continuing conceptual and empirical research is desirable. A fourth article concerns the reputational effects of the stock-option backdating scandal. The fifth article offers a critique of conventional approaches to defining and measuring reputation.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1132-1142
Number of pages	11
Journal	Business and Society
Volume	58
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319826520
State	Published - Jul 1 2019

Keywords

corporate philanthropy
corporate reputation
corporate social performance (CSP)
corporate social responsibility (CSR)
reputational damage
scandal
stock-option backdating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1177/0007650319826520

Cite this

@article{c2a7bfef0bd542cc9d0be87447751769,

title = "Corporate Reputation: Being Good and Looking Good",

abstract = "This article introduces the special issue on “Corporate Reputation: Being Good and Looking Good.” Three of the five included articles help to reinforce a conclusion that “being good” and “looking good” are not dichotomous, mutually exclusive conditions. Rather, the two dimensions are linked in some kind of causal relationship for which continuing conceptual and empirical research is desirable. A fourth article concerns the reputational effects of the stock-option backdating scandal. The fifth article offers a critique of conventional approaches to defining and measuring reputation.",

keywords = "corporate philanthropy, corporate reputation, corporate social performance (CSP), corporate social responsibility (CSR), reputational damage, scandal, stock-option backdating",

author = "Rosa Chun and Antonio Argando{\~n}a and Christine Choirat and Donald Siegel",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2019.",

year = "2019",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0007650319826520",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "58",

pages = "1132--1142",

journal = "Business and Society",

issn = "0007-6503",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporate Reputation

T2 - Being Good and Looking Good

AU - Chun, Rosa

AU - Argandoña, Antonio

AU - Choirat, Christine

AU - Siegel, Donald

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2019.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - This article introduces the special issue on “Corporate Reputation: Being Good and Looking Good.” Three of the five included articles help to reinforce a conclusion that “being good” and “looking good” are not dichotomous, mutually exclusive conditions. Rather, the two dimensions are linked in some kind of causal relationship for which continuing conceptual and empirical research is desirable. A fourth article concerns the reputational effects of the stock-option backdating scandal. The fifth article offers a critique of conventional approaches to defining and measuring reputation.

AB - This article introduces the special issue on “Corporate Reputation: Being Good and Looking Good.” Three of the five included articles help to reinforce a conclusion that “being good” and “looking good” are not dichotomous, mutually exclusive conditions. Rather, the two dimensions are linked in some kind of causal relationship for which continuing conceptual and empirical research is desirable. A fourth article concerns the reputational effects of the stock-option backdating scandal. The fifth article offers a critique of conventional approaches to defining and measuring reputation.

KW - corporate philanthropy

KW - corporate reputation

KW - corporate social performance (CSP)

KW - corporate social responsibility (CSR)

KW - reputational damage

KW - scandal

KW - stock-option backdating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061645611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061645611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0007650319826520

DO - 10.1177/0007650319826520

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061645611

SN - 0007-6503

VL - 58

SP - 1132

EP - 1142

JO - Business and Society

JF - Business and Society

IS - 6

ER -

Corporate Reputation: Being Good and Looking Good

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this