Coping with peer victimization: The role of children's attributions

Kari Jeanne Visconti, Casey M. Sechler, Becky Ladd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A social- cognitive framework was used to generate and test hypotheses regarding the role of children's causal attributions for peer victimization in predicting how they cope with such experiences.It was hypothesized that attributions would be differentially associated with coping as a function ofthe direction (i.e., upward, horizontal, or downward) of the social comparison reflected in children's perceived cause for their peer victimization. Self- and peer-reports were collected on 224 (97 boys, 127 girls) fourth- and sixth-grade ethnically diverse students (Mage 10.6 years, SD 1.08 years). Only children who had been targeted for peer aggression within the preceding two months were included to ensure they had a basis for answering questions regarding the cause of their victimization and how they coped. Data were gathered in the fall and spring of the academic school year and included reports of causal attributions, victimization, aggression, peer acceptance, and coping with victimization. Multiple regression analyses provided preliminary evidence that children's attributions were differentially predictive of changes in coping responses. For example, attributing victimization to one's race predicted decreases in seeking friend support and increases in nonchalance, whereas attributing it to not being as "cool" as others was associated with increases in seeking teacher and friend support, but decreases in nonchalance. Results suggest that children's attributions may reflect the resources they have available to them to cope with victimization. Such resources may be due to social status, or they may be due to the extent to which children blame themselves for the victimization (e.g., the degree to which they expect sympathy and help). Implications of these differential patterns of attributions and coping strategies for children's adjustment are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)122-140
Number of pages19
JournalSchool Psychology Quarterly
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Crime Victims
victimization
attribution
coping
Aggression
aggression
Social Adjustment
only child
cause
sympathy
resources
Self Report
social status
acceptance
Regression Analysis
Students
regression
teacher

Keywords

  • Attributions
  • Coping
  • Social cognition
  • Victimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Coping with peer victimization : The role of children's attributions. / Visconti, Kari Jeanne; Sechler, Casey M.; Ladd, Becky.

In: School Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 122-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Visconti, Kari Jeanne ; Sechler, Casey M. ; Ladd, Becky. / Coping with peer victimization : The role of children's attributions. In: School Psychology Quarterly. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 122-140.
@article{605449d0bcb54be0893017a0c4f452da,
title = "Coping with peer victimization: The role of children's attributions",
abstract = "A social- cognitive framework was used to generate and test hypotheses regarding the role of children's causal attributions for peer victimization in predicting how they cope with such experiences.It was hypothesized that attributions would be differentially associated with coping as a function ofthe direction (i.e., upward, horizontal, or downward) of the social comparison reflected in children's perceived cause for their peer victimization. Self- and peer-reports were collected on 224 (97 boys, 127 girls) fourth- and sixth-grade ethnically diverse students (Mage 10.6 years, SD 1.08 years). Only children who had been targeted for peer aggression within the preceding two months were included to ensure they had a basis for answering questions regarding the cause of their victimization and how they coped. Data were gathered in the fall and spring of the academic school year and included reports of causal attributions, victimization, aggression, peer acceptance, and coping with victimization. Multiple regression analyses provided preliminary evidence that children's attributions were differentially predictive of changes in coping responses. For example, attributing victimization to one's race predicted decreases in seeking friend support and increases in nonchalance, whereas attributing it to not being as {"}cool{"} as others was associated with increases in seeking teacher and friend support, but decreases in nonchalance. Results suggest that children's attributions may reflect the resources they have available to them to cope with victimization. Such resources may be due to social status, or they may be due to the extent to which children blame themselves for the victimization (e.g., the degree to which they expect sympathy and help). Implications of these differential patterns of attributions and coping strategies for children's adjustment are discussed.",
keywords = "Attributions, Coping, Social cognition, Victimization",
author = "Visconti, {Kari Jeanne} and Sechler, {Casey M.} and Becky Ladd",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/spq0000014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "122--140",
journal = "School Psychology",
issn = "2578-4218",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coping with peer victimization

T2 - The role of children's attributions

AU - Visconti, Kari Jeanne

AU - Sechler, Casey M.

AU - Ladd, Becky

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - A social- cognitive framework was used to generate and test hypotheses regarding the role of children's causal attributions for peer victimization in predicting how they cope with such experiences.It was hypothesized that attributions would be differentially associated with coping as a function ofthe direction (i.e., upward, horizontal, or downward) of the social comparison reflected in children's perceived cause for their peer victimization. Self- and peer-reports were collected on 224 (97 boys, 127 girls) fourth- and sixth-grade ethnically diverse students (Mage 10.6 years, SD 1.08 years). Only children who had been targeted for peer aggression within the preceding two months were included to ensure they had a basis for answering questions regarding the cause of their victimization and how they coped. Data were gathered in the fall and spring of the academic school year and included reports of causal attributions, victimization, aggression, peer acceptance, and coping with victimization. Multiple regression analyses provided preliminary evidence that children's attributions were differentially predictive of changes in coping responses. For example, attributing victimization to one's race predicted decreases in seeking friend support and increases in nonchalance, whereas attributing it to not being as "cool" as others was associated with increases in seeking teacher and friend support, but decreases in nonchalance. Results suggest that children's attributions may reflect the resources they have available to them to cope with victimization. Such resources may be due to social status, or they may be due to the extent to which children blame themselves for the victimization (e.g., the degree to which they expect sympathy and help). Implications of these differential patterns of attributions and coping strategies for children's adjustment are discussed.

AB - A social- cognitive framework was used to generate and test hypotheses regarding the role of children's causal attributions for peer victimization in predicting how they cope with such experiences.It was hypothesized that attributions would be differentially associated with coping as a function ofthe direction (i.e., upward, horizontal, or downward) of the social comparison reflected in children's perceived cause for their peer victimization. Self- and peer-reports were collected on 224 (97 boys, 127 girls) fourth- and sixth-grade ethnically diverse students (Mage 10.6 years, SD 1.08 years). Only children who had been targeted for peer aggression within the preceding two months were included to ensure they had a basis for answering questions regarding the cause of their victimization and how they coped. Data were gathered in the fall and spring of the academic school year and included reports of causal attributions, victimization, aggression, peer acceptance, and coping with victimization. Multiple regression analyses provided preliminary evidence that children's attributions were differentially predictive of changes in coping responses. For example, attributing victimization to one's race predicted decreases in seeking friend support and increases in nonchalance, whereas attributing it to not being as "cool" as others was associated with increases in seeking teacher and friend support, but decreases in nonchalance. Results suggest that children's attributions may reflect the resources they have available to them to cope with victimization. Such resources may be due to social status, or they may be due to the extent to which children blame themselves for the victimization (e.g., the degree to which they expect sympathy and help). Implications of these differential patterns of attributions and coping strategies for children's adjustment are discussed.

KW - Attributions

KW - Coping

KW - Social cognition

KW - Victimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882683807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882683807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/spq0000014

DO - 10.1037/spq0000014

M3 - Article

C2 - 23506020

AN - SCOPUS:84882683807

VL - 28

SP - 122

EP - 140

JO - School Psychology

JF - School Psychology

SN - 2578-4218

IS - 2

ER -