Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation

Timothy J. Nokes-Malach, Kurt VanLehn, Daniel M. Belenky, Max Lichtenstein, Gregory Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on expertise suggests that a critical aspect of expert understanding is knowledge of the relations between domain principles and problem features. We investigated two instructional pathways hypothesized to facilitate students' learning of these relations when studying worked examples. The first path is through self-explaining how worked examples instantiate domain principles and the second is through analogical comparison of worked examples. We compared both of these pathways to a third instructional path where students read worked examples and solved practice problems. Students in an introductory physics class were randomly assigned to one of three worked example conditions (reading, self-explanation, or analogy) when learning about rotational kinematics and then completed a set of problem solving and conceptual tests that measured near, intermediate, and far transfer. Students in the reading and self-explanation groups performed better than the analogy group on near transfer problems solved during the learning activities. However, this problem solving advantage was short lived as all three groups performed similarly on two intermediate transfer problems given at test. On the far transfer test, the self-explanation and analogy groups performed better than the reading group. These results are consistent with the idea that self-explanation and analogical comparison can facilitate conceptual learning without decrements to problem solving skills relative to a more traditional type of instruction in a classroom setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1237-1263
Number of pages27
JournalEuropean Journal of Psychology of Education
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Learning
Students
Reading
Group
learning
student
Physics
Biomechanical Phenomena
physics
expertise
Transfer (Psychology)
expert
instruction
classroom
Research
Practice (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Analogy
  • Explanation
  • Generalization
  • Instruction
  • Knowledge transfer
  • Learning
  • Principles
  • Problem solving
  • Worked examples

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation. / Nokes-Malach, Timothy J.; VanLehn, Kurt; Belenky, Daniel M.; Lichtenstein, Max; Cox, Gregory.

In: European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 28, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 1237-1263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nokes-Malach, Timothy J. ; VanLehn, Kurt ; Belenky, Daniel M. ; Lichtenstein, Max ; Cox, Gregory. / Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation. In: European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 1237-1263.
@article{c0eff23578684157b8052213dff22243,
title = "Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation",
abstract = "Research on expertise suggests that a critical aspect of expert understanding is knowledge of the relations between domain principles and problem features. We investigated two instructional pathways hypothesized to facilitate students' learning of these relations when studying worked examples. The first path is through self-explaining how worked examples instantiate domain principles and the second is through analogical comparison of worked examples. We compared both of these pathways to a third instructional path where students read worked examples and solved practice problems. Students in an introductory physics class were randomly assigned to one of three worked example conditions (reading, self-explanation, or analogy) when learning about rotational kinematics and then completed a set of problem solving and conceptual tests that measured near, intermediate, and far transfer. Students in the reading and self-explanation groups performed better than the analogy group on near transfer problems solved during the learning activities. However, this problem solving advantage was short lived as all three groups performed similarly on two intermediate transfer problems given at test. On the far transfer test, the self-explanation and analogy groups performed better than the reading group. These results are consistent with the idea that self-explanation and analogical comparison can facilitate conceptual learning without decrements to problem solving skills relative to a more traditional type of instruction in a classroom setting.",
keywords = "Analogy, Explanation, Generalization, Instruction, Knowledge transfer, Learning, Principles, Problem solving, Worked examples",
author = "Nokes-Malach, {Timothy J.} and Kurt VanLehn and Belenky, {Daniel M.} and Max Lichtenstein and Gregory Cox",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10212-012-0164-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1237--1263",
journal = "European Journal of Psychology of Education",
issn = "0256-2928",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation

AU - Nokes-Malach, Timothy J.

AU - VanLehn, Kurt

AU - Belenky, Daniel M.

AU - Lichtenstein, Max

AU - Cox, Gregory

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Research on expertise suggests that a critical aspect of expert understanding is knowledge of the relations between domain principles and problem features. We investigated two instructional pathways hypothesized to facilitate students' learning of these relations when studying worked examples. The first path is through self-explaining how worked examples instantiate domain principles and the second is through analogical comparison of worked examples. We compared both of these pathways to a third instructional path where students read worked examples and solved practice problems. Students in an introductory physics class were randomly assigned to one of three worked example conditions (reading, self-explanation, or analogy) when learning about rotational kinematics and then completed a set of problem solving and conceptual tests that measured near, intermediate, and far transfer. Students in the reading and self-explanation groups performed better than the analogy group on near transfer problems solved during the learning activities. However, this problem solving advantage was short lived as all three groups performed similarly on two intermediate transfer problems given at test. On the far transfer test, the self-explanation and analogy groups performed better than the reading group. These results are consistent with the idea that self-explanation and analogical comparison can facilitate conceptual learning without decrements to problem solving skills relative to a more traditional type of instruction in a classroom setting.

AB - Research on expertise suggests that a critical aspect of expert understanding is knowledge of the relations between domain principles and problem features. We investigated two instructional pathways hypothesized to facilitate students' learning of these relations when studying worked examples. The first path is through self-explaining how worked examples instantiate domain principles and the second is through analogical comparison of worked examples. We compared both of these pathways to a third instructional path where students read worked examples and solved practice problems. Students in an introductory physics class were randomly assigned to one of three worked example conditions (reading, self-explanation, or analogy) when learning about rotational kinematics and then completed a set of problem solving and conceptual tests that measured near, intermediate, and far transfer. Students in the reading and self-explanation groups performed better than the analogy group on near transfer problems solved during the learning activities. However, this problem solving advantage was short lived as all three groups performed similarly on two intermediate transfer problems given at test. On the far transfer test, the self-explanation and analogy groups performed better than the reading group. These results are consistent with the idea that self-explanation and analogical comparison can facilitate conceptual learning without decrements to problem solving skills relative to a more traditional type of instruction in a classroom setting.

KW - Analogy

KW - Explanation

KW - Generalization

KW - Instruction

KW - Knowledge transfer

KW - Learning

KW - Principles

KW - Problem solving

KW - Worked examples

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881610342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881610342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10212-012-0164-z

DO - 10.1007/s10212-012-0164-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84881610342

VL - 28

SP - 1237

EP - 1263

JO - European Journal of Psychology of Education

JF - European Journal of Psychology of Education

SN - 0256-2928

IS - 4

ER -