Cooperation in Human-Agent Systems to Support Resilience

A Microworld Experiment

Erin Chiou, John D. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study uses a dyadic approach to understand human-agent cooperation and system resilience. Background: Increasingly capable technology fundamentally changes human-machine relationships. Rather than reliance on or compliance with more or less reliable automation, we investigate interaction strategies with more or less cooperative agents. Method: A joint-task microworld scenario was developed to explore the effects of agent cooperation on participant cooperation and system resilience. To assess the effects of agent cooperation on participant cooperation, 36 people coordinated with a more or less cooperative agent by requesting resources and responding to requests for resources in a dynamic task environment. Another 36 people were recruited to assess effects following a perturbation in their own hospital. Results: Experiment 1 shows people reciprocated the cooperative behaviors of the agents; a low-cooperation agent led to less effective interactions and less resource sharing, whereas a high-cooperation agent led to more effective interactions and greater resource sharing. Experiment 2 shows that an initial fast-tempo perturbation undermined proactive cooperation - people tended to not request resources. However, the initial fast tempo had little effect on reactive cooperation - people tended to accept resource requests according to cooperation level. Conclusion: This study complements the supervisory control perspective of human-automation interaction by considering interdependence and cooperation rather than the more common focus on reliability and reliance. Application: The cooperativeness of automated agents can influence the cooperativeness of human agents. Design and evaluation for resilience in teams involving increasingly autonomous agents should consider the cooperative behaviors of these agents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)846-863
Number of pages18
JournalHuman Factors
Volume58
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

resilience
Automation
Autonomous agents
experiment
Cooperative Behavior
Experiments
resources
cooperative behavior
Joints
interaction
automation
Technology
joint tasks
interdependence
Compliance
scenario

Keywords

  • autonomous agents
  • human-automation interaction
  • team collaboration
  • technology acceptance
  • trust in automation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Medicine(all)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Cooperation in Human-Agent Systems to Support Resilience : A Microworld Experiment. / Chiou, Erin; Lee, John D.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 58, No. 6, 01.09.2016, p. 846-863.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{faaa694a9cc742b5a2b8d28df348ac41,
title = "Cooperation in Human-Agent Systems to Support Resilience: A Microworld Experiment",
abstract = "Objective: This study uses a dyadic approach to understand human-agent cooperation and system resilience. Background: Increasingly capable technology fundamentally changes human-machine relationships. Rather than reliance on or compliance with more or less reliable automation, we investigate interaction strategies with more or less cooperative agents. Method: A joint-task microworld scenario was developed to explore the effects of agent cooperation on participant cooperation and system resilience. To assess the effects of agent cooperation on participant cooperation, 36 people coordinated with a more or less cooperative agent by requesting resources and responding to requests for resources in a dynamic task environment. Another 36 people were recruited to assess effects following a perturbation in their own hospital. Results: Experiment 1 shows people reciprocated the cooperative behaviors of the agents; a low-cooperation agent led to less effective interactions and less resource sharing, whereas a high-cooperation agent led to more effective interactions and greater resource sharing. Experiment 2 shows that an initial fast-tempo perturbation undermined proactive cooperation - people tended to not request resources. However, the initial fast tempo had little effect on reactive cooperation - people tended to accept resource requests according to cooperation level. Conclusion: This study complements the supervisory control perspective of human-automation interaction by considering interdependence and cooperation rather than the more common focus on reliability and reliance. Application: The cooperativeness of automated agents can influence the cooperativeness of human agents. Design and evaluation for resilience in teams involving increasingly autonomous agents should consider the cooperative behaviors of these agents.",
keywords = "autonomous agents, human-automation interaction, team collaboration, technology acceptance, trust in automation",
author = "Erin Chiou and Lee, {John D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018720816649094",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "846--863",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cooperation in Human-Agent Systems to Support Resilience

T2 - A Microworld Experiment

AU - Chiou, Erin

AU - Lee, John D.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Objective: This study uses a dyadic approach to understand human-agent cooperation and system resilience. Background: Increasingly capable technology fundamentally changes human-machine relationships. Rather than reliance on or compliance with more or less reliable automation, we investigate interaction strategies with more or less cooperative agents. Method: A joint-task microworld scenario was developed to explore the effects of agent cooperation on participant cooperation and system resilience. To assess the effects of agent cooperation on participant cooperation, 36 people coordinated with a more or less cooperative agent by requesting resources and responding to requests for resources in a dynamic task environment. Another 36 people were recruited to assess effects following a perturbation in their own hospital. Results: Experiment 1 shows people reciprocated the cooperative behaviors of the agents; a low-cooperation agent led to less effective interactions and less resource sharing, whereas a high-cooperation agent led to more effective interactions and greater resource sharing. Experiment 2 shows that an initial fast-tempo perturbation undermined proactive cooperation - people tended to not request resources. However, the initial fast tempo had little effect on reactive cooperation - people tended to accept resource requests according to cooperation level. Conclusion: This study complements the supervisory control perspective of human-automation interaction by considering interdependence and cooperation rather than the more common focus on reliability and reliance. Application: The cooperativeness of automated agents can influence the cooperativeness of human agents. Design and evaluation for resilience in teams involving increasingly autonomous agents should consider the cooperative behaviors of these agents.

AB - Objective: This study uses a dyadic approach to understand human-agent cooperation and system resilience. Background: Increasingly capable technology fundamentally changes human-machine relationships. Rather than reliance on or compliance with more or less reliable automation, we investigate interaction strategies with more or less cooperative agents. Method: A joint-task microworld scenario was developed to explore the effects of agent cooperation on participant cooperation and system resilience. To assess the effects of agent cooperation on participant cooperation, 36 people coordinated with a more or less cooperative agent by requesting resources and responding to requests for resources in a dynamic task environment. Another 36 people were recruited to assess effects following a perturbation in their own hospital. Results: Experiment 1 shows people reciprocated the cooperative behaviors of the agents; a low-cooperation agent led to less effective interactions and less resource sharing, whereas a high-cooperation agent led to more effective interactions and greater resource sharing. Experiment 2 shows that an initial fast-tempo perturbation undermined proactive cooperation - people tended to not request resources. However, the initial fast tempo had little effect on reactive cooperation - people tended to accept resource requests according to cooperation level. Conclusion: This study complements the supervisory control perspective of human-automation interaction by considering interdependence and cooperation rather than the more common focus on reliability and reliance. Application: The cooperativeness of automated agents can influence the cooperativeness of human agents. Design and evaluation for resilience in teams involving increasingly autonomous agents should consider the cooperative behaviors of these agents.

KW - autonomous agents

KW - human-automation interaction

KW - team collaboration

KW - technology acceptance

KW - trust in automation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982794803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982794803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018720816649094

DO - 10.1177/0018720816649094

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 846

EP - 863

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 6

ER -