Convicting and sentencing differences among black, hispanic, and white males in six localities

Susan Welch, Cassia Spohn, John Gruhl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The many studies examining differences in convicting and sentencing black, Hispanic, and white defendants have not led to solid generalizations about the treatment of these defendants because the studies have been done at different times and with different methodologies. This study ex­amines differences in convicting and sentencing male defendants in six lo­calities, at the same time and with the same methodology. It concludes that discrimination is directed against blacks and is manifested in incarcer­ation rates. The exact source of this discrimination is not identical in all cities. In some, it seems to occur because whites get better plea bargains than blacks; in others, it is due to the different rates of guilty pleas by black and whites. Overall, there is less evidence of discrimination in cases where a trial is held than in those where a guilty plea is entered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-80
Number of pages14
JournalJustice Quarterly
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hispanic Americans
discrimination
methodology
evidence
hydroquinone
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Convicting and sentencing differences among black, hispanic, and white males in six localities. / Welch, Susan; Spohn, Cassia; Gruhl, John.

In: Justice Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1985, p. 67-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b6403c4ddafa4d878a2903675315bd22,
title = "Convicting and sentencing differences among black, hispanic, and white males in six localities",
abstract = "The many studies examining differences in convicting and sentencing black, Hispanic, and white defendants have not led to solid generalizations about the treatment of these defendants because the studies have been done at different times and with different methodologies. This study ex­amines differences in convicting and sentencing male defendants in six lo­calities, at the same time and with the same methodology. It concludes that discrimination is directed against blacks and is manifested in incarcer­ation rates. The exact source of this discrimination is not identical in all cities. In some, it seems to occur because whites get better plea bargains than blacks; in others, it is due to the different rates of guilty pleas by black and whites. Overall, there is less evidence of discrimination in cases where a trial is held than in those where a guilty plea is entered.",
author = "Susan Welch and Cassia Spohn and John Gruhl",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1080/07418828500088391",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "67--80",
journal = "Justice Quarterly",
issn = "0741-8825",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Convicting and sentencing differences among black, hispanic, and white males in six localities

AU - Welch, Susan

AU - Spohn, Cassia

AU - Gruhl, John

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - The many studies examining differences in convicting and sentencing black, Hispanic, and white defendants have not led to solid generalizations about the treatment of these defendants because the studies have been done at different times and with different methodologies. This study ex­amines differences in convicting and sentencing male defendants in six lo­calities, at the same time and with the same methodology. It concludes that discrimination is directed against blacks and is manifested in incarcer­ation rates. The exact source of this discrimination is not identical in all cities. In some, it seems to occur because whites get better plea bargains than blacks; in others, it is due to the different rates of guilty pleas by black and whites. Overall, there is less evidence of discrimination in cases where a trial is held than in those where a guilty plea is entered.

AB - The many studies examining differences in convicting and sentencing black, Hispanic, and white defendants have not led to solid generalizations about the treatment of these defendants because the studies have been done at different times and with different methodologies. This study ex­amines differences in convicting and sentencing male defendants in six lo­calities, at the same time and with the same methodology. It concludes that discrimination is directed against blacks and is manifested in incarcer­ation rates. The exact source of this discrimination is not identical in all cities. In some, it seems to occur because whites get better plea bargains than blacks; in others, it is due to the different rates of guilty pleas by black and whites. Overall, there is less evidence of discrimination in cases where a trial is held than in those where a guilty plea is entered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007065750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007065750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07418828500088391

DO - 10.1080/07418828500088391

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0007065750

VL - 2

SP - 67

EP - 80

JO - Justice Quarterly

JF - Justice Quarterly

SN - 0741-8825

IS - 1

ER -