Convergences and divergences

Bertha Manninen, Jack Mulder

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The purpose of this book is, largely, two-fold. First, we wanted to present to the reader the respective reasons we are either pro-life (Mulder) or pro-choice (Manninen), and also, we responded to each other’s arguments and concerns. In doing so, we hope to have exemplified the principle John Stuart Mill invokes when he writes: The only way in which a human being can make some approach to knowing the whole of a subject is by hearing what can be said about it by persons of every variety of opinion, and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind. No wise man ever acquired his wisdom in any mode but this; nor is it in the nature of human intellect to become wise in any other manner. 1 Indeed, we both think that the best way to learn about the strength of your own views and your own convictions is to patiently examine those views from a variety of perspectives, including those with which one disagrees. Mill notes that until we do this, until we submit even our most cherished views to critical scrutiny, “we do not understand the grounds of our opinions.”

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCivil Dialogue on Abortion
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages172-212
Number of pages41
ISBN (Electronic)9781351819244
ISBN (Print)9781138205864
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Divergence
Intellect
Human Being
Person
Fold
Conviction
Wise Men
John Stuart Mill
Reader
Scrutiny
Wisdom
Hearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Manninen, B., & Mulder, J. (2018). Convergences and divergences. In Civil Dialogue on Abortion (pp. 172-212). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213651

Convergences and divergences. / Manninen, Bertha; Mulder, Jack.

Civil Dialogue on Abortion. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 172-212.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Manninen, B & Mulder, J 2018, Convergences and divergences. in Civil Dialogue on Abortion. Taylor and Francis, pp. 172-212. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213651
Manninen B, Mulder J. Convergences and divergences. In Civil Dialogue on Abortion. Taylor and Francis. 2018. p. 172-212 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213651
Manninen, Bertha ; Mulder, Jack. / Convergences and divergences. Civil Dialogue on Abortion. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 172-212
@inbook{2dabed610b4d43e8a096b957889e5754,
title = "Convergences and divergences",
abstract = "The purpose of this book is, largely, two-fold. First, we wanted to present to the reader the respective reasons we are either pro-life (Mulder) or pro-choice (Manninen), and also, we responded to each other’s arguments and concerns. In doing so, we hope to have exemplified the principle John Stuart Mill invokes when he writes: The only way in which a human being can make some approach to knowing the whole of a subject is by hearing what can be said about it by persons of every variety of opinion, and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind. No wise man ever acquired his wisdom in any mode but this; nor is it in the nature of human intellect to become wise in any other manner. 1 Indeed, we both think that the best way to learn about the strength of your own views and your own convictions is to patiently examine those views from a variety of perspectives, including those with which one disagrees. Mill notes that until we do this, until we submit even our most cherished views to critical scrutiny, “we do not understand the grounds of our opinions.”",
author = "Bertha Manninen and Jack Mulder",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315213651",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138205864",
pages = "172--212",
booktitle = "Civil Dialogue on Abortion",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Convergences and divergences

AU - Manninen, Bertha

AU - Mulder, Jack

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this book is, largely, two-fold. First, we wanted to present to the reader the respective reasons we are either pro-life (Mulder) or pro-choice (Manninen), and also, we responded to each other’s arguments and concerns. In doing so, we hope to have exemplified the principle John Stuart Mill invokes when he writes: The only way in which a human being can make some approach to knowing the whole of a subject is by hearing what can be said about it by persons of every variety of opinion, and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind. No wise man ever acquired his wisdom in any mode but this; nor is it in the nature of human intellect to become wise in any other manner. 1 Indeed, we both think that the best way to learn about the strength of your own views and your own convictions is to patiently examine those views from a variety of perspectives, including those with which one disagrees. Mill notes that until we do this, until we submit even our most cherished views to critical scrutiny, “we do not understand the grounds of our opinions.”

AB - The purpose of this book is, largely, two-fold. First, we wanted to present to the reader the respective reasons we are either pro-life (Mulder) or pro-choice (Manninen), and also, we responded to each other’s arguments and concerns. In doing so, we hope to have exemplified the principle John Stuart Mill invokes when he writes: The only way in which a human being can make some approach to knowing the whole of a subject is by hearing what can be said about it by persons of every variety of opinion, and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind. No wise man ever acquired his wisdom in any mode but this; nor is it in the nature of human intellect to become wise in any other manner. 1 Indeed, we both think that the best way to learn about the strength of your own views and your own convictions is to patiently examine those views from a variety of perspectives, including those with which one disagrees. Mill notes that until we do this, until we submit even our most cherished views to critical scrutiny, “we do not understand the grounds of our opinions.”

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048690198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048690198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315213651

DO - 10.4324/9781315213651

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138205864

SP - 172

EP - 212

BT - Civil Dialogue on Abortion

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -