Contrast effects in flavour preference learning.

E. Capaldi, J. D. Sheffer, R. J. Pulley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In four experiments the role of contrast effects in producing learned flavour preferences was examined. The experiments showed that contrast effects are pervasive in flavour preference learning, producing results that are often paradoxical from a traditional reinforcement point of view. In Experiment 1, rats preferred a reinforced flavour over a nonreinforced flavour more if the reinforcer was 1% sucrose than if the reinforcer was 8% sucrose. Because the cue flavour was dissolved in 8% sucrose, this represents an anticipatory positive contrast effect. In Experiment 2, the relationship between cue and consequence was shown to be important in flavour preference learning, as expected if contrast effects are involved. In Experiment 3, rats preferred a flavour that was reinforced 4 times, and they preferred this flavour more than one reinforced 8 times, presumably because the greater the expectancy of the consequence, the greater the anticipatory negative contrast. In Experiment 4, rats consumed less of 0.15% saccharin if they received 32% sucrose randomly 90 min either before or after the 0.15% saccharin than if they received only 0.15% saccharin, a simultaneous negative contrast effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)307-323
Number of pages17
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology
Volume41
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Saccharin
Sucrose
Learning
Cues

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Contrast effects in flavour preference learning. / Capaldi, E.; Sheffer, J. D.; Pulley, R. J.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 3, 08.1989, p. 307-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1fb062f9f54745a78c58e395cfd29339,
title = "Contrast effects in flavour preference learning.",
abstract = "In four experiments the role of contrast effects in producing learned flavour preferences was examined. The experiments showed that contrast effects are pervasive in flavour preference learning, producing results that are often paradoxical from a traditional reinforcement point of view. In Experiment 1, rats preferred a reinforced flavour over a nonreinforced flavour more if the reinforcer was 1{\%} sucrose than if the reinforcer was 8{\%} sucrose. Because the cue flavour was dissolved in 8{\%} sucrose, this represents an anticipatory positive contrast effect. In Experiment 2, the relationship between cue and consequence was shown to be important in flavour preference learning, as expected if contrast effects are involved. In Experiment 3, rats preferred a flavour that was reinforced 4 times, and they preferred this flavour more than one reinforced 8 times, presumably because the greater the expectancy of the consequence, the greater the anticipatory negative contrast. In Experiment 4, rats consumed less of 0.15{\%} saccharin if they received 32{\%} sucrose randomly 90 min either before or after the 0.15{\%} saccharin than if they received only 0.15{\%} saccharin, a simultaneous negative contrast effect.",
author = "E. Capaldi and Sheffer, {J. D.} and Pulley, {R. J.}",
year = "1989",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "307--323",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology",
issn = "0272-4995",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast effects in flavour preference learning.

AU - Capaldi, E.

AU - Sheffer, J. D.

AU - Pulley, R. J.

PY - 1989/8

Y1 - 1989/8

N2 - In four experiments the role of contrast effects in producing learned flavour preferences was examined. The experiments showed that contrast effects are pervasive in flavour preference learning, producing results that are often paradoxical from a traditional reinforcement point of view. In Experiment 1, rats preferred a reinforced flavour over a nonreinforced flavour more if the reinforcer was 1% sucrose than if the reinforcer was 8% sucrose. Because the cue flavour was dissolved in 8% sucrose, this represents an anticipatory positive contrast effect. In Experiment 2, the relationship between cue and consequence was shown to be important in flavour preference learning, as expected if contrast effects are involved. In Experiment 3, rats preferred a flavour that was reinforced 4 times, and they preferred this flavour more than one reinforced 8 times, presumably because the greater the expectancy of the consequence, the greater the anticipatory negative contrast. In Experiment 4, rats consumed less of 0.15% saccharin if they received 32% sucrose randomly 90 min either before or after the 0.15% saccharin than if they received only 0.15% saccharin, a simultaneous negative contrast effect.

AB - In four experiments the role of contrast effects in producing learned flavour preferences was examined. The experiments showed that contrast effects are pervasive in flavour preference learning, producing results that are often paradoxical from a traditional reinforcement point of view. In Experiment 1, rats preferred a reinforced flavour over a nonreinforced flavour more if the reinforcer was 1% sucrose than if the reinforcer was 8% sucrose. Because the cue flavour was dissolved in 8% sucrose, this represents an anticipatory positive contrast effect. In Experiment 2, the relationship between cue and consequence was shown to be important in flavour preference learning, as expected if contrast effects are involved. In Experiment 3, rats preferred a flavour that was reinforced 4 times, and they preferred this flavour more than one reinforced 8 times, presumably because the greater the expectancy of the consequence, the greater the anticipatory negative contrast. In Experiment 4, rats consumed less of 0.15% saccharin if they received 32% sucrose randomly 90 min either before or after the 0.15% saccharin than if they received only 0.15% saccharin, a simultaneous negative contrast effect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024710621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024710621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 307

EP - 323

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

SN - 0272-4995

IS - 3

ER -