TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrast and reinforcement in consumption
AU - Capaldi, Elizabeth D.
AU - Sheffer, Joan D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH39453 to Elizabeth D. Capaldi. The assistance of Jacqueline Owens in preparation of the figures in this manuscript is gratefully acknowledged. Requests for reprints should be sent to Elizabeth D. Capaldi, Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2065.
PY - 1992/2
Y1 - 1992/2
N2 - In three experiments negative contrast in consummatory responding was measured, as well as the preference for the flavor associated with the lesser reinforcer. In all experiments one flavor of saccharin was given on days that chocolate milk occurred and another flavor was given on days with no chocolate milk. For some groups the saccharin preceded chocolate milk, for others the order of chocolate milk and saccharin was random, and for others the saccharin followed the chocolate milk. In all experiments rats suppressed consumption of the lesser reinforcer during training (negative contrast) but preferred the flavor of saccharin that had accompanied chocolate milk to the flavor of saccharin that occurred alone. This suggests that contrast is not a reflection of reduced reward value of the lesser reinforcer. Instead some negative reaction to receiving the lesser reinforcer during training must suppress consumption.
AB - In three experiments negative contrast in consummatory responding was measured, as well as the preference for the flavor associated with the lesser reinforcer. In all experiments one flavor of saccharin was given on days that chocolate milk occurred and another flavor was given on days with no chocolate milk. For some groups the saccharin preceded chocolate milk, for others the order of chocolate milk and saccharin was random, and for others the saccharin followed the chocolate milk. In all experiments rats suppressed consumption of the lesser reinforcer during training (negative contrast) but preferred the flavor of saccharin that had accompanied chocolate milk to the flavor of saccharin that occurred alone. This suggests that contrast is not a reflection of reduced reward value of the lesser reinforcer. Instead some negative reaction to receiving the lesser reinforcer during training must suppress consumption.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249012743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38249012743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0023-9690(92)90023-F
DO - 10.1016/0023-9690(92)90023-F
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:38249012743
SN - 0023-9690
VL - 23
SP - 63
EP - 79
JO - Learning and Motivation
JF - Learning and Motivation
IS - 1
ER -