Contracts, demand characteristics, and self-control

Frederick H. Kanfer, Larry E. Cox, Jerry M. Greiner, Paul Karoly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Describes 3 experiments testing predictions from a conceptualization of self-control that separates commitment (contract) from execution. The cold pressor test provided the experimental procedure for all Ss. In Exp I, with 64 female undergraduates, ice water tolerance was greater with an explicit written contract than with oral instructions conveying the same content. After interpolated experience with the E, Ss who believed they had failed to meet contract conditions tolerated ice water longer than those who believed the E failed to meet conditions. In Exp II, 48 Ss anticipating reinforcement for contract fulfillment tolerated the ice water longer than Ss who were not reinforced or who received reinforcement contingent only on contract making. In Exp III with 96 Ss, examination of the magnitude of intention to tolerate ice water revealed that presence of the aversive cues associated with the task and high probability of demands to fulfill the contract significantly lowered commitments. Delay of onset of the task only weakly (p < .10) affected commitment; short-delay eliciting reduced estimates of tolerance. Results are discussed in relation to demand characteristics and reconceptualization of self-control that stresses the importance of situational variables and Ss' commitments to future action. (35 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)605-619
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1974
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

self-control
Ice
Contracts
commitment
Water
demand
water
Cues
reinforcement
tolerance
Self-Control
instruction
Reinforcement (Psychology)
examination
experiment

Keywords

  • female college students
  • written vs oral contracts vs expectations of reinforcement, self-control, male &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Contracts, demand characteristics, and self-control. / Kanfer, Frederick H.; Cox, Larry E.; Greiner, Jerry M.; Karoly, Paul.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 5, 11.1974, p. 605-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kanfer, Frederick H. ; Cox, Larry E. ; Greiner, Jerry M. ; Karoly, Paul. / Contracts, demand characteristics, and self-control. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 605-619.
@article{48d2018829dd43a78d75cd972a1fcc9f,
title = "Contracts, demand characteristics, and self-control",
abstract = "Describes 3 experiments testing predictions from a conceptualization of self-control that separates commitment (contract) from execution. The cold pressor test provided the experimental procedure for all Ss. In Exp I, with 64 female undergraduates, ice water tolerance was greater with an explicit written contract than with oral instructions conveying the same content. After interpolated experience with the E, Ss who believed they had failed to meet contract conditions tolerated ice water longer than those who believed the E failed to meet conditions. In Exp II, 48 Ss anticipating reinforcement for contract fulfillment tolerated the ice water longer than Ss who were not reinforced or who received reinforcement contingent only on contract making. In Exp III with 96 Ss, examination of the magnitude of intention to tolerate ice water revealed that presence of the aversive cues associated with the task and high probability of demands to fulfill the contract significantly lowered commitments. Delay of onset of the task only weakly (p < .10) affected commitment; short-delay eliciting reduced estimates of tolerance. Results are discussed in relation to demand characteristics and reconceptualization of self-control that stresses the importance of situational variables and Ss' commitments to future action. (35 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "female college students, written vs oral contracts vs expectations of reinforcement, self-control, male &",
author = "Kanfer, {Frederick H.} and Cox, {Larry E.} and Greiner, {Jerry M.} and Paul Karoly",
year = "1974",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/h0037451",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "605--619",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contracts, demand characteristics, and self-control

AU - Kanfer, Frederick H.

AU - Cox, Larry E.

AU - Greiner, Jerry M.

AU - Karoly, Paul

PY - 1974/11

Y1 - 1974/11

N2 - Describes 3 experiments testing predictions from a conceptualization of self-control that separates commitment (contract) from execution. The cold pressor test provided the experimental procedure for all Ss. In Exp I, with 64 female undergraduates, ice water tolerance was greater with an explicit written contract than with oral instructions conveying the same content. After interpolated experience with the E, Ss who believed they had failed to meet contract conditions tolerated ice water longer than those who believed the E failed to meet conditions. In Exp II, 48 Ss anticipating reinforcement for contract fulfillment tolerated the ice water longer than Ss who were not reinforced or who received reinforcement contingent only on contract making. In Exp III with 96 Ss, examination of the magnitude of intention to tolerate ice water revealed that presence of the aversive cues associated with the task and high probability of demands to fulfill the contract significantly lowered commitments. Delay of onset of the task only weakly (p < .10) affected commitment; short-delay eliciting reduced estimates of tolerance. Results are discussed in relation to demand characteristics and reconceptualization of self-control that stresses the importance of situational variables and Ss' commitments to future action. (35 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Describes 3 experiments testing predictions from a conceptualization of self-control that separates commitment (contract) from execution. The cold pressor test provided the experimental procedure for all Ss. In Exp I, with 64 female undergraduates, ice water tolerance was greater with an explicit written contract than with oral instructions conveying the same content. After interpolated experience with the E, Ss who believed they had failed to meet contract conditions tolerated ice water longer than those who believed the E failed to meet conditions. In Exp II, 48 Ss anticipating reinforcement for contract fulfillment tolerated the ice water longer than Ss who were not reinforced or who received reinforcement contingent only on contract making. In Exp III with 96 Ss, examination of the magnitude of intention to tolerate ice water revealed that presence of the aversive cues associated with the task and high probability of demands to fulfill the contract significantly lowered commitments. Delay of onset of the task only weakly (p < .10) affected commitment; short-delay eliciting reduced estimates of tolerance. Results are discussed in relation to demand characteristics and reconceptualization of self-control that stresses the importance of situational variables and Ss' commitments to future action. (35 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - female college students

KW - written vs oral contracts vs expectations of reinforcement, self-control, male &

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001288610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001288610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0037451

DO - 10.1037/h0037451

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 605

EP - 619

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -