Contract Administration Tools for Design-Build and Construction Manager/General Contractor Highway Projects

Dean Papajohn, Mounir El Asmar, Keith R. Molenaar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Alternative contracting methods (ACMs) such as design-build (DB) and construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC), when used strategically, have been shown in some studies to offer cost and schedule advantages over design-bid-build. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is promoting the use of ACMs, and agencies are increasingly implementing ACMs. However, state agency ACM manuals and federal guidebooks tend to focus on pre-award activities. A need exists to provide guidance to agencies on how to administer ACM post-award activities effectively in order to realize their benefits. This paper presents 36 tools for ACM contract administration that were collected from 30 project case studies with 18 transportation agencies involving 91 interviewees. Integrated DEFinition (IDEF0) modeling was used to map and compare differences between delivery methods at the functional level, whereas previous ACM models focused on contract relationships and lines of communication. This paper contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing a comprehensive portfolio of tools for ACM highway projects that are field-tested by transportation agencies, along with recommendations on appropriateness for project phase, complexity, and size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04019028
JournalJournal of Management in Engineering
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Contractors
Managers
Highway administration
Communication
Costs
Design/build
Contract administration
Contracting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial relations
  • Engineering(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Contract Administration Tools for Design-Build and Construction Manager/General Contractor Highway Projects. / Papajohn, Dean; El Asmar, Mounir; Molenaar, Keith R.

In: Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 6, 04019028, 01.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b2a3560b9f74c99b4284d2ab5d663da,
title = "Contract Administration Tools for Design-Build and Construction Manager/General Contractor Highway Projects",
abstract = "Alternative contracting methods (ACMs) such as design-build (DB) and construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC), when used strategically, have been shown in some studies to offer cost and schedule advantages over design-bid-build. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is promoting the use of ACMs, and agencies are increasingly implementing ACMs. However, state agency ACM manuals and federal guidebooks tend to focus on pre-award activities. A need exists to provide guidance to agencies on how to administer ACM post-award activities effectively in order to realize their benefits. This paper presents 36 tools for ACM contract administration that were collected from 30 project case studies with 18 transportation agencies involving 91 interviewees. Integrated DEFinition (IDEF0) modeling was used to map and compare differences between delivery methods at the functional level, whereas previous ACM models focused on contract relationships and lines of communication. This paper contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing a comprehensive portfolio of tools for ACM highway projects that are field-tested by transportation agencies, along with recommendations on appropriateness for project phase, complexity, and size.",
author = "Dean Papajohn and {El Asmar}, Mounir and Molenaar, {Keith R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000718",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
journal = "Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "0742-597X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contract Administration Tools for Design-Build and Construction Manager/General Contractor Highway Projects

AU - Papajohn, Dean

AU - El Asmar, Mounir

AU - Molenaar, Keith R.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Alternative contracting methods (ACMs) such as design-build (DB) and construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC), when used strategically, have been shown in some studies to offer cost and schedule advantages over design-bid-build. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is promoting the use of ACMs, and agencies are increasingly implementing ACMs. However, state agency ACM manuals and federal guidebooks tend to focus on pre-award activities. A need exists to provide guidance to agencies on how to administer ACM post-award activities effectively in order to realize their benefits. This paper presents 36 tools for ACM contract administration that were collected from 30 project case studies with 18 transportation agencies involving 91 interviewees. Integrated DEFinition (IDEF0) modeling was used to map and compare differences between delivery methods at the functional level, whereas previous ACM models focused on contract relationships and lines of communication. This paper contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing a comprehensive portfolio of tools for ACM highway projects that are field-tested by transportation agencies, along with recommendations on appropriateness for project phase, complexity, and size.

AB - Alternative contracting methods (ACMs) such as design-build (DB) and construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC), when used strategically, have been shown in some studies to offer cost and schedule advantages over design-bid-build. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is promoting the use of ACMs, and agencies are increasingly implementing ACMs. However, state agency ACM manuals and federal guidebooks tend to focus on pre-award activities. A need exists to provide guidance to agencies on how to administer ACM post-award activities effectively in order to realize their benefits. This paper presents 36 tools for ACM contract administration that were collected from 30 project case studies with 18 transportation agencies involving 91 interviewees. Integrated DEFinition (IDEF0) modeling was used to map and compare differences between delivery methods at the functional level, whereas previous ACM models focused on contract relationships and lines of communication. This paper contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing a comprehensive portfolio of tools for ACM highway projects that are field-tested by transportation agencies, along with recommendations on appropriateness for project phase, complexity, and size.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071686068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071686068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000718

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000718

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071686068

VL - 35

JO - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

SN - 0742-597X

IS - 6

M1 - 04019028

ER -