Contextualizing dirty work: The neglected role of cultural, historical, and demographic context

Blake Ashforth, Glen E. Kreiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although perceptions of physically, socially, and morally stigmatized occupations - 'dirty work' - are socially constructed, very little attention has been paid to how the context shapes those constructions. We explore the impact of historical trends (when), macro and micro cultures (where), and demographic characteristics (who) on the social construction of dirty work. Historically, the rise of hygiene, along with economic and technological development, resulted in greater societal distancing from dirty work, while the rise of liberalism has resulted in greater social acceptance of some morally stigmatized occupations. Culturally, masculinity tends to be preferred over femininity as an ideological discourse for dirty work, unless the occupation is female-dominated; members of collectivist cultures are generally better able than members of individualist cultures to combat the collective-level threat that stigma inherently represents; and members of high power-distance cultures tend to view dirty work more negatively than members of low power-distance cultures. Demographically, marginalized work tends to devolve to marginalized socioeconomic, gender, and racioethnic categories, creating a pernicious and entrapping recursive loop between 'dirty work' and being labeled as 'dirty people.'

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-440
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Management and Organization
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 14 2014

Fingerprint

Demographics
Power distance
Technological development
Social construction
Socio-economics
Discourse
Economic development
Stigma
Liberalism
Threat
Demographic characteristics
Acceptance
Hygiene
Masculinity
Femininity

Keywords

  • Cultural values
  • Demographics
  • Dirty work
  • History
  • Social construction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Business and International Management

Cite this

Contextualizing dirty work : The neglected role of cultural, historical, and demographic context. / Ashforth, Blake; Kreiner, Glen E.

In: Journal of Management and Organization, Vol. 20, No. 4, 14.11.2014, p. 423-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5bdb1db803e14ef8a65b45cc9b46d827,
title = "Contextualizing dirty work: The neglected role of cultural, historical, and demographic context",
abstract = "Although perceptions of physically, socially, and morally stigmatized occupations - 'dirty work' - are socially constructed, very little attention has been paid to how the context shapes those constructions. We explore the impact of historical trends (when), macro and micro cultures (where), and demographic characteristics (who) on the social construction of dirty work. Historically, the rise of hygiene, along with economic and technological development, resulted in greater societal distancing from dirty work, while the rise of liberalism has resulted in greater social acceptance of some morally stigmatized occupations. Culturally, masculinity tends to be preferred over femininity as an ideological discourse for dirty work, unless the occupation is female-dominated; members of collectivist cultures are generally better able than members of individualist cultures to combat the collective-level threat that stigma inherently represents; and members of high power-distance cultures tend to view dirty work more negatively than members of low power-distance cultures. Demographically, marginalized work tends to devolve to marginalized socioeconomic, gender, and racioethnic categories, creating a pernicious and entrapping recursive loop between 'dirty work' and being labeled as 'dirty people.'",
keywords = "Cultural values, Demographics, Dirty work, History, Social construction",
author = "Blake Ashforth and Kreiner, {Glen E.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1017/jmo.2014.38",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "423--440",
journal = "Journal of Management and Organization",
issn = "1833-3672",
publisher = "eContent Management Pty Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contextualizing dirty work

T2 - The neglected role of cultural, historical, and demographic context

AU - Ashforth, Blake

AU - Kreiner, Glen E.

PY - 2014/11/14

Y1 - 2014/11/14

N2 - Although perceptions of physically, socially, and morally stigmatized occupations - 'dirty work' - are socially constructed, very little attention has been paid to how the context shapes those constructions. We explore the impact of historical trends (when), macro and micro cultures (where), and demographic characteristics (who) on the social construction of dirty work. Historically, the rise of hygiene, along with economic and technological development, resulted in greater societal distancing from dirty work, while the rise of liberalism has resulted in greater social acceptance of some morally stigmatized occupations. Culturally, masculinity tends to be preferred over femininity as an ideological discourse for dirty work, unless the occupation is female-dominated; members of collectivist cultures are generally better able than members of individualist cultures to combat the collective-level threat that stigma inherently represents; and members of high power-distance cultures tend to view dirty work more negatively than members of low power-distance cultures. Demographically, marginalized work tends to devolve to marginalized socioeconomic, gender, and racioethnic categories, creating a pernicious and entrapping recursive loop between 'dirty work' and being labeled as 'dirty people.'

AB - Although perceptions of physically, socially, and morally stigmatized occupations - 'dirty work' - are socially constructed, very little attention has been paid to how the context shapes those constructions. We explore the impact of historical trends (when), macro and micro cultures (where), and demographic characteristics (who) on the social construction of dirty work. Historically, the rise of hygiene, along with economic and technological development, resulted in greater societal distancing from dirty work, while the rise of liberalism has resulted in greater social acceptance of some morally stigmatized occupations. Culturally, masculinity tends to be preferred over femininity as an ideological discourse for dirty work, unless the occupation is female-dominated; members of collectivist cultures are generally better able than members of individualist cultures to combat the collective-level threat that stigma inherently represents; and members of high power-distance cultures tend to view dirty work more negatively than members of low power-distance cultures. Demographically, marginalized work tends to devolve to marginalized socioeconomic, gender, and racioethnic categories, creating a pernicious and entrapping recursive loop between 'dirty work' and being labeled as 'dirty people.'

KW - Cultural values

KW - Demographics

KW - Dirty work

KW - History

KW - Social construction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911074822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911074822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/jmo.2014.38

DO - 10.1017/jmo.2014.38

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84911074822

VL - 20

SP - 423

EP - 440

JO - Journal of Management and Organization

JF - Journal of Management and Organization

SN - 1833-3672

IS - 4

ER -