Context and change: The evolution of pioneering drug courts in portland and las vegas (1991–1998)

John Goldkamp, Michael White, Jennifer Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drug courts in the United States are still relatively young, but they have proliferated dramatically since the first innovation in Miami in 1989. Research focusing on drug courts is now beginning to gain momentum, though it still lags considerably behind the growth of the movement itself. This article describes findings from a first “longitudinal” examination of two of the nation’s first and longest operating courts in Portland and Las Vegas, focusing on the dynamic nature of the evolution of the model as adapted in each site. In particular, the research considers the impact of contextual factors – laws, administrative policies, and federal court orders – on the growth of drug court models in each jurisdiction as measured through their screening and enrolling mechanisms over time. The time series analyses suggest that several contextual factors played an important role in shaping these courts and affecting their impact on the target populations and the results they produced. The longitudinal findings illustrate the importance of context in making sense of “normal” evaluation findings and emphasize the dynamic nature of the change process in implementing innovative policy in the criminal courts. Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-170
Number of pages30
JournalLaw and Policy
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

drug
administrative policy
time series
jurisdiction
innovation
examination
Law
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Context and change : The evolution of pioneering drug courts in portland and las vegas (1991–1998). / Goldkamp, John; White, Michael; Robinson, Jennifer.

In: Law and Policy, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.01.2001, p. 141-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e3049b30885c498e9f2a4d7c7ad10b7e,
title = "Context and change: The evolution of pioneering drug courts in portland and las vegas (1991–1998)",
abstract = "Drug courts in the United States are still relatively young, but they have proliferated dramatically since the first innovation in Miami in 1989. Research focusing on drug courts is now beginning to gain momentum, though it still lags considerably behind the growth of the movement itself. This article describes findings from a first “longitudinal” examination of two of the nation’s first and longest operating courts in Portland and Las Vegas, focusing on the dynamic nature of the evolution of the model as adapted in each site. In particular, the research considers the impact of contextual factors – laws, administrative policies, and federal court orders – on the growth of drug court models in each jurisdiction as measured through their screening and enrolling mechanisms over time. The time series analyses suggest that several contextual factors played an important role in shaping these courts and affecting their impact on the target populations and the results they produced. The longitudinal findings illustrate the importance of context in making sense of “normal” evaluation findings and emphasize the dynamic nature of the change process in implementing innovative policy in the criminal courts. Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001.",
author = "John Goldkamp and Michael White and Jennifer Robinson",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9930.00108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "141--170",
journal = "Law and Policy",
issn = "0265-8240",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Context and change

T2 - The evolution of pioneering drug courts in portland and las vegas (1991–1998)

AU - Goldkamp, John

AU - White, Michael

AU - Robinson, Jennifer

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Drug courts in the United States are still relatively young, but they have proliferated dramatically since the first innovation in Miami in 1989. Research focusing on drug courts is now beginning to gain momentum, though it still lags considerably behind the growth of the movement itself. This article describes findings from a first “longitudinal” examination of two of the nation’s first and longest operating courts in Portland and Las Vegas, focusing on the dynamic nature of the evolution of the model as adapted in each site. In particular, the research considers the impact of contextual factors – laws, administrative policies, and federal court orders – on the growth of drug court models in each jurisdiction as measured through their screening and enrolling mechanisms over time. The time series analyses suggest that several contextual factors played an important role in shaping these courts and affecting their impact on the target populations and the results they produced. The longitudinal findings illustrate the importance of context in making sense of “normal” evaluation findings and emphasize the dynamic nature of the change process in implementing innovative policy in the criminal courts. Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001.

AB - Drug courts in the United States are still relatively young, but they have proliferated dramatically since the first innovation in Miami in 1989. Research focusing on drug courts is now beginning to gain momentum, though it still lags considerably behind the growth of the movement itself. This article describes findings from a first “longitudinal” examination of two of the nation’s first and longest operating courts in Portland and Las Vegas, focusing on the dynamic nature of the evolution of the model as adapted in each site. In particular, the research considers the impact of contextual factors – laws, administrative policies, and federal court orders – on the growth of drug court models in each jurisdiction as measured through their screening and enrolling mechanisms over time. The time series analyses suggest that several contextual factors played an important role in shaping these courts and affecting their impact on the target populations and the results they produced. The longitudinal findings illustrate the importance of context in making sense of “normal” evaluation findings and emphasize the dynamic nature of the change process in implementing innovative policy in the criminal courts. Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18244408058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18244408058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9930.00108

DO - 10.1111/1467-9930.00108

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:18244408058

VL - 23

SP - 141

EP - 170

JO - Law and Policy

JF - Law and Policy

SN - 0265-8240

IS - 2

ER -