Contending with Contemporaneity in Settlement-Pattern Studies

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Settlement-pattern studies are plagued by the problem of analyzing site distribution maps for time periods during which not all sites are contemporaneous. In a key insight, Dewar (1991) used counts of sites occupied at the beginning and end of a period to estimate, through simulation, the number of simultaneously occupied sites. While Dewar's treatment is an important contribution, drawbacks to his method are identified and remedies proposed. First, an equation that obviates the need for the simulation is provided. It is then shown that Dewar's method fails to take into account those sites that are both established and abandoned during the period. Finally, this problem is remedied through a modification of the equation that incorporates the single-period sites in the estimate of the number of contemporaneous sites. Application to Valley of Mexico settlement data suggests larger numbers of simultaneously occupied sites and shorter site use spans than were obtained by Dewar.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-148
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Antiquity
Volume59
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

settlement pattern
simulation
remedies
Mexico
Settlement Patterns
Contemporaneity
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Archaeology
  • Museology

Cite this

Contending with Contemporaneity in Settlement-Pattern Studies. / Kintigh, Keith.

In: American Antiquity, Vol. 59, No. 1, 01.01.1994, p. 143-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{f991074895f54f0191b526ed49eddbb5,
title = "Contending with Contemporaneity in Settlement-Pattern Studies",
abstract = "Settlement-pattern studies are plagued by the problem of analyzing site distribution maps for time periods during which not all sites are contemporaneous. In a key insight, Dewar (1991) used counts of sites occupied at the beginning and end of a period to estimate, through simulation, the number of simultaneously occupied sites. While Dewar's treatment is an important contribution, drawbacks to his method are identified and remedies proposed. First, an equation that obviates the need for the simulation is provided. It is then shown that Dewar's method fails to take into account those sites that are both established and abandoned during the period. Finally, this problem is remedied through a modification of the equation that incorporates the single-period sites in the estimate of the number of contemporaneous sites. Application to Valley of Mexico settlement data suggests larger numbers of simultaneously occupied sites and shorter site use spans than were obtained by Dewar.",
author = "Keith Kintigh",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/3085507",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "143--148",
journal = "American Antiquity",
issn = "0002-7316",
publisher = "Society for American Archaeology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contending with Contemporaneity in Settlement-Pattern Studies

AU - Kintigh, Keith

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Settlement-pattern studies are plagued by the problem of analyzing site distribution maps for time periods during which not all sites are contemporaneous. In a key insight, Dewar (1991) used counts of sites occupied at the beginning and end of a period to estimate, through simulation, the number of simultaneously occupied sites. While Dewar's treatment is an important contribution, drawbacks to his method are identified and remedies proposed. First, an equation that obviates the need for the simulation is provided. It is then shown that Dewar's method fails to take into account those sites that are both established and abandoned during the period. Finally, this problem is remedied through a modification of the equation that incorporates the single-period sites in the estimate of the number of contemporaneous sites. Application to Valley of Mexico settlement data suggests larger numbers of simultaneously occupied sites and shorter site use spans than were obtained by Dewar.

AB - Settlement-pattern studies are plagued by the problem of analyzing site distribution maps for time periods during which not all sites are contemporaneous. In a key insight, Dewar (1991) used counts of sites occupied at the beginning and end of a period to estimate, through simulation, the number of simultaneously occupied sites. While Dewar's treatment is an important contribution, drawbacks to his method are identified and remedies proposed. First, an equation that obviates the need for the simulation is provided. It is then shown that Dewar's method fails to take into account those sites that are both established and abandoned during the period. Finally, this problem is remedied through a modification of the equation that incorporates the single-period sites in the estimate of the number of contemporaneous sites. Application to Valley of Mexico settlement data suggests larger numbers of simultaneously occupied sites and shorter site use spans than were obtained by Dewar.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898183429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898183429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/3085507

DO - 10.2307/3085507

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84898183429

VL - 59

SP - 143

EP - 148

JO - American Antiquity

JF - American Antiquity

SN - 0002-7316

IS - 1

ER -