Containment versus escalation: The trajectory of couples’ conversational complaints

Janet Alberts, Gillian Driscoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was designed to analyze couples’ complaint episodes. Rather than focusing on single act‐to‐act sequences, this analysis focused on lengthier interactions of four to approximately 70 turns. This microanalysis revealed that during conflict couples typically enact one of six complaint episodes: passed (ignoring the complaint), refocused (changing the focus of the complaint), mitigated (downgrading the severity of the complaint), responsive (validating the partner's complaint), unresponsive (denying the validity of the partner's complaint), or escalated (expanding the topic and hostility level of the complaint interaction). It was also determined that satisfied couples were three times more likely to engage in passed, refocused, mitigated and responsive episodes while dissatisfied and mixed couples were twice as likely to engage in unresponsive or escalated episodes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)394-412
Number of pages19
JournalWestern Journal of Communication
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

escalation
Microanalysis
complaint
Trajectories
Complaints
Trajectory
Containment
interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication

Cite this

Containment versus escalation : The trajectory of couples’ conversational complaints. / Alberts, Janet; Driscoll, Gillian.

In: Western Journal of Communication, Vol. 56, No. 4, 1992, p. 394-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bedc557b09f14a7fad09681a9eb458b3,
title = "Containment versus escalation: The trajectory of couples’ conversational complaints",
abstract = "This study was designed to analyze couples’ complaint episodes. Rather than focusing on single act‐to‐act sequences, this analysis focused on lengthier interactions of four to approximately 70 turns. This microanalysis revealed that during conflict couples typically enact one of six complaint episodes: passed (ignoring the complaint), refocused (changing the focus of the complaint), mitigated (downgrading the severity of the complaint), responsive (validating the partner's complaint), unresponsive (denying the validity of the partner's complaint), or escalated (expanding the topic and hostility level of the complaint interaction). It was also determined that satisfied couples were three times more likely to engage in passed, refocused, mitigated and responsive episodes while dissatisfied and mixed couples were twice as likely to engage in unresponsive or escalated episodes.",
author = "Janet Alberts and Gillian Driscoll",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1080/10570319209374425",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "394--412",
journal = "Western Journal of Communication",
issn = "1057-0314",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Containment versus escalation

T2 - The trajectory of couples’ conversational complaints

AU - Alberts, Janet

AU - Driscoll, Gillian

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - This study was designed to analyze couples’ complaint episodes. Rather than focusing on single act‐to‐act sequences, this analysis focused on lengthier interactions of four to approximately 70 turns. This microanalysis revealed that during conflict couples typically enact one of six complaint episodes: passed (ignoring the complaint), refocused (changing the focus of the complaint), mitigated (downgrading the severity of the complaint), responsive (validating the partner's complaint), unresponsive (denying the validity of the partner's complaint), or escalated (expanding the topic and hostility level of the complaint interaction). It was also determined that satisfied couples were three times more likely to engage in passed, refocused, mitigated and responsive episodes while dissatisfied and mixed couples were twice as likely to engage in unresponsive or escalated episodes.

AB - This study was designed to analyze couples’ complaint episodes. Rather than focusing on single act‐to‐act sequences, this analysis focused on lengthier interactions of four to approximately 70 turns. This microanalysis revealed that during conflict couples typically enact one of six complaint episodes: passed (ignoring the complaint), refocused (changing the focus of the complaint), mitigated (downgrading the severity of the complaint), responsive (validating the partner's complaint), unresponsive (denying the validity of the partner's complaint), or escalated (expanding the topic and hostility level of the complaint interaction). It was also determined that satisfied couples were three times more likely to engage in passed, refocused, mitigated and responsive episodes while dissatisfied and mixed couples were twice as likely to engage in unresponsive or escalated episodes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000600693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000600693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10570319209374425

DO - 10.1080/10570319209374425

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000600693

VL - 56

SP - 394

EP - 412

JO - Western Journal of Communication

JF - Western Journal of Communication

SN - 1057-0314

IS - 4

ER -