Constructing immigrant “illegality”: Critiques, experiences, and responses

Cecilia Menjívar, Daniel Kanstroom

Research output: Book/ReportBook

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The topic of “illegal” immigration has been a major aspect of public discourse in the United States and many other immigrant-receiving countries. From the beginning of its modern invocation in the early twentieth century, the often ill-defined epithet of human “illegality” has figured prominently in the media; in vigorous public debates at the national, state, and local levels; and in presidential campaigns. In this collection of essays, contributors from a variety of disciplines – anthropology, law, political science, religious studies, and sociology – examine how immigration law shapes immigrant illegality, how the concept of immigrant illegality is deployed and lived, and how its power is wielded and resisted. The authors conclude that the current concept of immigrant illegality is in need of sustained critique, as careful analysis will aid policy discussions and lead to more just solutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages399
ISBN (Print)9781107300408, 9781107041592
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

illegality
immigrant
experience
illegal immigration
immigration law
political science
anthropology
sociology
twentieth century
campaign
Law
discourse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Constructing immigrant “illegality” : Critiques, experiences, and responses. / Menjívar, Cecilia; Kanstroom, Daniel.

Cambridge University Press, 2010. 399 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Menjívar, Cecilia ; Kanstroom, Daniel. / Constructing immigrant “illegality” : Critiques, experiences, and responses. Cambridge University Press, 2010. 399 p.
@book{3db5e787ce104f3b9bb1bb794b2e76d8,
title = "Constructing immigrant “illegality”: Critiques, experiences, and responses",
abstract = "The topic of “illegal” immigration has been a major aspect of public discourse in the United States and many other immigrant-receiving countries. From the beginning of its modern invocation in the early twentieth century, the often ill-defined epithet of human “illegality” has figured prominently in the media; in vigorous public debates at the national, state, and local levels; and in presidential campaigns. In this collection of essays, contributors from a variety of disciplines – anthropology, law, political science, religious studies, and sociology – examine how immigration law shapes immigrant illegality, how the concept of immigrant illegality is deployed and lived, and how its power is wielded and resisted. The authors conclude that the current concept of immigrant illegality is in need of sustained critique, as careful analysis will aid policy discussions and lead to more just solutions.",
author = "Cecilia Menj{\'i}var and Daniel Kanstroom",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107300408",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107300408",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Constructing immigrant “illegality”

T2 - Critiques, experiences, and responses

AU - Menjívar, Cecilia

AU - Kanstroom, Daniel

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The topic of “illegal” immigration has been a major aspect of public discourse in the United States and many other immigrant-receiving countries. From the beginning of its modern invocation in the early twentieth century, the often ill-defined epithet of human “illegality” has figured prominently in the media; in vigorous public debates at the national, state, and local levels; and in presidential campaigns. In this collection of essays, contributors from a variety of disciplines – anthropology, law, political science, religious studies, and sociology – examine how immigration law shapes immigrant illegality, how the concept of immigrant illegality is deployed and lived, and how its power is wielded and resisted. The authors conclude that the current concept of immigrant illegality is in need of sustained critique, as careful analysis will aid policy discussions and lead to more just solutions.

AB - The topic of “illegal” immigration has been a major aspect of public discourse in the United States and many other immigrant-receiving countries. From the beginning of its modern invocation in the early twentieth century, the often ill-defined epithet of human “illegality” has figured prominently in the media; in vigorous public debates at the national, state, and local levels; and in presidential campaigns. In this collection of essays, contributors from a variety of disciplines – anthropology, law, political science, religious studies, and sociology – examine how immigration law shapes immigrant illegality, how the concept of immigrant illegality is deployed and lived, and how its power is wielded and resisted. The authors conclude that the current concept of immigrant illegality is in need of sustained critique, as careful analysis will aid policy discussions and lead to more just solutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923401357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923401357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107300408

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107300408

M3 - Book

AN - SCOPUS:84923401357

SN - 9781107300408

SN - 9781107041592

BT - Constructing immigrant “illegality”

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -