Considerations for physical activity research: Variations on a theme

Sandra A. Ham, Caroline A. Macera, Deborah A. Jones, Barbara Ainsworth, Kathleen M. Turczyn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To explore among demographic groups the differences in prevalence estimates of physical activity that may occur as a result of differences in survey design characteristics, including question wording, placement, and examples of activities. Methods: We compared responses to similar physical activity instruments administered to large samples of adults in 1999 (n = 9,775), 2000 (n = 32,374), and 1999–2000 (n = 7,529). The questions assessed participation in non-occupational physical activity at vigorous and moderate intensities. Surveys used in-person or telephone interviews. Results: The prevalence of recommended levels of physical activity (i.e., ≥3 days and ≥20 min vigorous activities or ≥5 days and ≥30 min moderate activities) varied 10% across 3 surveys. Although survey design characteristics varied, higher prevalence was associated with the use of examples to measure multiple domains of activity and question order. Conclusions: Measuring multiple domains is important for assessing health-related physical activity. These results suggest that physical activity measurement varies with question and survey design characteristics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)98-113
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Physical Activity and Health
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews
Health

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Prevalence
  • Socioeconomic status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Ham, S. A., Macera, C. A., Jones, D. A., Ainsworth, B., & Turczyn, K. M. (2004). Considerations for physical activity research: Variations on a theme. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 1(2), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.1.2.98

Considerations for physical activity research : Variations on a theme. / Ham, Sandra A.; Macera, Caroline A.; Jones, Deborah A.; Ainsworth, Barbara; Turczyn, Kathleen M.

In: Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 1, No. 2, 01.04.2004, p. 98-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ham, SA, Macera, CA, Jones, DA, Ainsworth, B & Turczyn, KM 2004, 'Considerations for physical activity research: Variations on a theme', Journal of Physical Activity and Health, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.1.2.98
Ham, Sandra A. ; Macera, Caroline A. ; Jones, Deborah A. ; Ainsworth, Barbara ; Turczyn, Kathleen M. / Considerations for physical activity research : Variations on a theme. In: Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2004 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 98-113.
@article{eb82540f53434fdba61319d66909d006,
title = "Considerations for physical activity research: Variations on a theme",
abstract = "Purpose: To explore among demographic groups the differences in prevalence estimates of physical activity that may occur as a result of differences in survey design characteristics, including question wording, placement, and examples of activities. Methods: We compared responses to similar physical activity instruments administered to large samples of adults in 1999 (n = 9,775), 2000 (n = 32,374), and 1999–2000 (n = 7,529). The questions assessed participation in non-occupational physical activity at vigorous and moderate intensities. Surveys used in-person or telephone interviews. Results: The prevalence of recommended levels of physical activity (i.e., ≥3 days and ≥20 min vigorous activities or ≥5 days and ≥30 min moderate activities) varied 10{\%} across 3 surveys. Although survey design characteristics varied, higher prevalence was associated with the use of examples to measure multiple domains of activity and question order. Conclusions: Measuring multiple domains is important for assessing health-related physical activity. These results suggest that physical activity measurement varies with question and survey design characteristics.",
keywords = "Exercise, Prevalence, Socioeconomic status",
author = "Ham, {Sandra A.} and Macera, {Caroline A.} and Jones, {Deborah A.} and Barbara Ainsworth and Turczyn, {Kathleen M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/jpah.1.2.98",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "98--113",
journal = "Journal of Physical Activity and Health",
issn = "1543-3080",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considerations for physical activity research

T2 - Variations on a theme

AU - Ham, Sandra A.

AU - Macera, Caroline A.

AU - Jones, Deborah A.

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

AU - Turczyn, Kathleen M.

PY - 2004/4/1

Y1 - 2004/4/1

N2 - Purpose: To explore among demographic groups the differences in prevalence estimates of physical activity that may occur as a result of differences in survey design characteristics, including question wording, placement, and examples of activities. Methods: We compared responses to similar physical activity instruments administered to large samples of adults in 1999 (n = 9,775), 2000 (n = 32,374), and 1999–2000 (n = 7,529). The questions assessed participation in non-occupational physical activity at vigorous and moderate intensities. Surveys used in-person or telephone interviews. Results: The prevalence of recommended levels of physical activity (i.e., ≥3 days and ≥20 min vigorous activities or ≥5 days and ≥30 min moderate activities) varied 10% across 3 surveys. Although survey design characteristics varied, higher prevalence was associated with the use of examples to measure multiple domains of activity and question order. Conclusions: Measuring multiple domains is important for assessing health-related physical activity. These results suggest that physical activity measurement varies with question and survey design characteristics.

AB - Purpose: To explore among demographic groups the differences in prevalence estimates of physical activity that may occur as a result of differences in survey design characteristics, including question wording, placement, and examples of activities. Methods: We compared responses to similar physical activity instruments administered to large samples of adults in 1999 (n = 9,775), 2000 (n = 32,374), and 1999–2000 (n = 7,529). The questions assessed participation in non-occupational physical activity at vigorous and moderate intensities. Surveys used in-person or telephone interviews. Results: The prevalence of recommended levels of physical activity (i.e., ≥3 days and ≥20 min vigorous activities or ≥5 days and ≥30 min moderate activities) varied 10% across 3 surveys. Although survey design characteristics varied, higher prevalence was associated with the use of examples to measure multiple domains of activity and question order. Conclusions: Measuring multiple domains is important for assessing health-related physical activity. These results suggest that physical activity measurement varies with question and survey design characteristics.

KW - Exercise

KW - Prevalence

KW - Socioeconomic status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748581132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748581132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/jpah.1.2.98

DO - 10.1123/jpah.1.2.98

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748581132

VL - 1

SP - 98

EP - 113

JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health

JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health

SN - 1543-3080

IS - 2

ER -