Consider this: A comparison of factors contributing to employees' expressions of dissent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, full-time employees were surveyed to determine the degree to which different considerations factored into their decisions to express upward or lateral dissent. Employees rated considerations similarly when reportedly dissenting to either supervisors or coworkers, with organizational climate and organizational attachment considerations being comparatively stronger than concerns associated with being perceived as adversarial and experiencing retaliation. A comparison across types of dissent revealed that organizational climate, organizational attachment, and adversarial perception/retaliation were more important considerations when employees expressed upward versus lateral dissent. Additionally, results suggested no significant differences in the way management and non-management employees weighed considerations when expressing dissent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)342-355
Number of pages14
JournalCommunication Quarterly
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

employee
Personnel
retaliation
climate
co-worker
Supervisory personnel
management

Keywords

  • Employee Dissent
  • Organizational Democracy
  • Organizational Participation
  • Superior-Subordinate Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Consider this : A comparison of factors contributing to employees' expressions of dissent. / Kassing, Jeffrey.

In: Communication Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 3, 01.01.2008, p. 342-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{463da99c06914043b257432561113c39,
title = "Consider this: A comparison of factors contributing to employees' expressions of dissent",
abstract = "In this study, full-time employees were surveyed to determine the degree to which different considerations factored into their decisions to express upward or lateral dissent. Employees rated considerations similarly when reportedly dissenting to either supervisors or coworkers, with organizational climate and organizational attachment considerations being comparatively stronger than concerns associated with being perceived as adversarial and experiencing retaliation. A comparison across types of dissent revealed that organizational climate, organizational attachment, and adversarial perception/retaliation were more important considerations when employees expressed upward versus lateral dissent. Additionally, results suggested no significant differences in the way management and non-management employees weighed considerations when expressing dissent.",
keywords = "Employee Dissent, Organizational Democracy, Organizational Participation, Superior-Subordinate Communication",
author = "Jeffrey Kassing",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01463370802240825",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "342--355",
journal = "Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0146-3373",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consider this

T2 - A comparison of factors contributing to employees' expressions of dissent

AU - Kassing, Jeffrey

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - In this study, full-time employees were surveyed to determine the degree to which different considerations factored into their decisions to express upward or lateral dissent. Employees rated considerations similarly when reportedly dissenting to either supervisors or coworkers, with organizational climate and organizational attachment considerations being comparatively stronger than concerns associated with being perceived as adversarial and experiencing retaliation. A comparison across types of dissent revealed that organizational climate, organizational attachment, and adversarial perception/retaliation were more important considerations when employees expressed upward versus lateral dissent. Additionally, results suggested no significant differences in the way management and non-management employees weighed considerations when expressing dissent.

AB - In this study, full-time employees were surveyed to determine the degree to which different considerations factored into their decisions to express upward or lateral dissent. Employees rated considerations similarly when reportedly dissenting to either supervisors or coworkers, with organizational climate and organizational attachment considerations being comparatively stronger than concerns associated with being perceived as adversarial and experiencing retaliation. A comparison across types of dissent revealed that organizational climate, organizational attachment, and adversarial perception/retaliation were more important considerations when employees expressed upward versus lateral dissent. Additionally, results suggested no significant differences in the way management and non-management employees weighed considerations when expressing dissent.

KW - Employee Dissent

KW - Organizational Democracy

KW - Organizational Participation

KW - Superior-Subordinate Communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551636928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551636928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01463370802240825

DO - 10.1080/01463370802240825

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79551636928

VL - 56

SP - 342

EP - 355

JO - Communication Quarterly

JF - Communication Quarterly

SN - 0146-3373

IS - 3

ER -