Consensus and crisis: Representing the poor in the post-civil rights era

M. David Forrest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent financial crisis in the US has stemmed, in part, from the persistent failure of political elites to effectively represent the poor. This article examines this failure, casting it as a matter of discourse. During the post-civil rights era, political elites have directed their efforts on behalf of the poor through a series of consensual discourses. The consensus they enact is, more specifically, between two ascendant traditions: advanced liberalism, focused on achieving the full incorporation of marginalized groups; and colorblind racism, focused on mobilizing formally race-neutral policies and practices. The first part shows how this dominant consensus legitimated the turn to a racially biased neoliberal regime of poverty management. The second part links its influence to the recent financial crisis, focusing especially on how it has, somewhat paradoxically, taken root in the efforts of antipoverty activists. The article concludes by clarifying the importance of imagining and pursuing representative strategies that more directly counter the dominant consensus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-43
Number of pages25
JournalNew Political Science
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

civil rights
political elite
financial crisis
discourse
liberalism
racism
regime
poverty
management
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Consensus and crisis : Representing the poor in the post-civil rights era. / Forrest, M. David.

In: New Political Science, Vol. 35, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 19-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0bf15a8874a84c19b37f433bb8f72e84,
title = "Consensus and crisis: Representing the poor in the post-civil rights era",
abstract = "The recent financial crisis in the US has stemmed, in part, from the persistent failure of political elites to effectively represent the poor. This article examines this failure, casting it as a matter of discourse. During the post-civil rights era, political elites have directed their efforts on behalf of the poor through a series of consensual discourses. The consensus they enact is, more specifically, between two ascendant traditions: advanced liberalism, focused on achieving the full incorporation of marginalized groups; and colorblind racism, focused on mobilizing formally race-neutral policies and practices. The first part shows how this dominant consensus legitimated the turn to a racially biased neoliberal regime of poverty management. The second part links its influence to the recent financial crisis, focusing especially on how it has, somewhat paradoxically, taken root in the efforts of antipoverty activists. The article concludes by clarifying the importance of imagining and pursuing representative strategies that more directly counter the dominant consensus.",
author = "Forrest, {M. David}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/07393148.2012.754667",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "19--43",
journal = "New Political Science",
issn = "0739-3148",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus and crisis

T2 - Representing the poor in the post-civil rights era

AU - Forrest, M. David

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The recent financial crisis in the US has stemmed, in part, from the persistent failure of political elites to effectively represent the poor. This article examines this failure, casting it as a matter of discourse. During the post-civil rights era, political elites have directed their efforts on behalf of the poor through a series of consensual discourses. The consensus they enact is, more specifically, between two ascendant traditions: advanced liberalism, focused on achieving the full incorporation of marginalized groups; and colorblind racism, focused on mobilizing formally race-neutral policies and practices. The first part shows how this dominant consensus legitimated the turn to a racially biased neoliberal regime of poverty management. The second part links its influence to the recent financial crisis, focusing especially on how it has, somewhat paradoxically, taken root in the efforts of antipoverty activists. The article concludes by clarifying the importance of imagining and pursuing representative strategies that more directly counter the dominant consensus.

AB - The recent financial crisis in the US has stemmed, in part, from the persistent failure of political elites to effectively represent the poor. This article examines this failure, casting it as a matter of discourse. During the post-civil rights era, political elites have directed their efforts on behalf of the poor through a series of consensual discourses. The consensus they enact is, more specifically, between two ascendant traditions: advanced liberalism, focused on achieving the full incorporation of marginalized groups; and colorblind racism, focused on mobilizing formally race-neutral policies and practices. The first part shows how this dominant consensus legitimated the turn to a racially biased neoliberal regime of poverty management. The second part links its influence to the recent financial crisis, focusing especially on how it has, somewhat paradoxically, taken root in the efforts of antipoverty activists. The article concludes by clarifying the importance of imagining and pursuing representative strategies that more directly counter the dominant consensus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875935277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875935277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07393148.2012.754667

DO - 10.1080/07393148.2012.754667

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875935277

VL - 35

SP - 19

EP - 43

JO - New Political Science

JF - New Political Science

SN - 0739-3148

IS - 1

ER -