Connectivity among terrorist groups: A two models business maturity approach

Kevin C. Desouza, Tobin Hensgen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reality of terrorism has become ubiquitous. Terrorist groups continue to garner front-page exposure, which contributes to their agenda, while stories of hostage dilemmas, suicide bombings, assassinations, and a variety of nefarious criminal activities lead the unsuspecting to wonder, "What's next?" In order to begin to understand terrorism researchers should first understand how these terrorist groups operate and, far more importantly, what motivates others to co-operate with terrorists. No terrorist group operates in isolation. It is assured a priori that terrorist groups have to collaborate with other entities in order to further their agenda. In the conventional sense, terrorists have limited resources, limited capabilities, and limited reach. Without co-operation and support in support of criminal enterprises, they would function in isolation; their impact would be isolated. This article outlines two models that demonstrate how cooperation between terrorists and recognized, albeit criminal, institutions contribute to terrorist successes. The first, a resource model, outlines some of the resources that bind two or more terrorist groups. The second, an alliance model, layers different levels of collaborative engagements between terrorist groups and these institutions. Both models are descriptive in nature and contribute to an understanding of how terrorist groups must engage in the fundamentals of established economic practices in order to succeed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)593-613
Number of pages21
JournalStudies in Conflict and Terrorism
Volume30
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

maturity
Terrorism
Industry
Group
Bombing
social isolation
terrorism
resources
Economics
suicide
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Connectivity among terrorist groups : A two models business maturity approach. / Desouza, Kevin C.; Hensgen, Tobin.

In: Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Vol. 30, No. 7, 07.2007, p. 593-613.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Desouza, Kevin C. ; Hensgen, Tobin. / Connectivity among terrorist groups : A two models business maturity approach. In: Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 2007 ; Vol. 30, No. 7. pp. 593-613.
@article{a01af81abc694846a456f903f2ae5713,
title = "Connectivity among terrorist groups: A two models business maturity approach",
abstract = "The reality of terrorism has become ubiquitous. Terrorist groups continue to garner front-page exposure, which contributes to their agenda, while stories of hostage dilemmas, suicide bombings, assassinations, and a variety of nefarious criminal activities lead the unsuspecting to wonder, {"}What's next?{"} In order to begin to understand terrorism researchers should first understand how these terrorist groups operate and, far more importantly, what motivates others to co-operate with terrorists. No terrorist group operates in isolation. It is assured a priori that terrorist groups have to collaborate with other entities in order to further their agenda. In the conventional sense, terrorists have limited resources, limited capabilities, and limited reach. Without co-operation and support in support of criminal enterprises, they would function in isolation; their impact would be isolated. This article outlines two models that demonstrate how cooperation between terrorists and recognized, albeit criminal, institutions contribute to terrorist successes. The first, a resource model, outlines some of the resources that bind two or more terrorist groups. The second, an alliance model, layers different levels of collaborative engagements between terrorist groups and these institutions. Both models are descriptive in nature and contribute to an understanding of how terrorist groups must engage in the fundamentals of established economic practices in order to succeed.",
author = "Desouza, {Kevin C.} and Tobin Hensgen",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/10576100701385966",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "593--613",
journal = "Studies in Conflict and Terrorism",
issn = "1057-610X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Connectivity among terrorist groups

T2 - A two models business maturity approach

AU - Desouza, Kevin C.

AU - Hensgen, Tobin

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - The reality of terrorism has become ubiquitous. Terrorist groups continue to garner front-page exposure, which contributes to their agenda, while stories of hostage dilemmas, suicide bombings, assassinations, and a variety of nefarious criminal activities lead the unsuspecting to wonder, "What's next?" In order to begin to understand terrorism researchers should first understand how these terrorist groups operate and, far more importantly, what motivates others to co-operate with terrorists. No terrorist group operates in isolation. It is assured a priori that terrorist groups have to collaborate with other entities in order to further their agenda. In the conventional sense, terrorists have limited resources, limited capabilities, and limited reach. Without co-operation and support in support of criminal enterprises, they would function in isolation; their impact would be isolated. This article outlines two models that demonstrate how cooperation between terrorists and recognized, albeit criminal, institutions contribute to terrorist successes. The first, a resource model, outlines some of the resources that bind two or more terrorist groups. The second, an alliance model, layers different levels of collaborative engagements between terrorist groups and these institutions. Both models are descriptive in nature and contribute to an understanding of how terrorist groups must engage in the fundamentals of established economic practices in order to succeed.

AB - The reality of terrorism has become ubiquitous. Terrorist groups continue to garner front-page exposure, which contributes to their agenda, while stories of hostage dilemmas, suicide bombings, assassinations, and a variety of nefarious criminal activities lead the unsuspecting to wonder, "What's next?" In order to begin to understand terrorism researchers should first understand how these terrorist groups operate and, far more importantly, what motivates others to co-operate with terrorists. No terrorist group operates in isolation. It is assured a priori that terrorist groups have to collaborate with other entities in order to further their agenda. In the conventional sense, terrorists have limited resources, limited capabilities, and limited reach. Without co-operation and support in support of criminal enterprises, they would function in isolation; their impact would be isolated. This article outlines two models that demonstrate how cooperation between terrorists and recognized, albeit criminal, institutions contribute to terrorist successes. The first, a resource model, outlines some of the resources that bind two or more terrorist groups. The second, an alliance model, layers different levels of collaborative engagements between terrorist groups and these institutions. Both models are descriptive in nature and contribute to an understanding of how terrorist groups must engage in the fundamentals of established economic practices in order to succeed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249845791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249845791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10576100701385966

DO - 10.1080/10576100701385966

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249845791

VL - 30

SP - 593

EP - 613

JO - Studies in Conflict and Terrorism

JF - Studies in Conflict and Terrorism

SN - 1057-610X

IS - 7

ER -