Conflict and fairness in social exchange

Linda D. Molm, Jessica L. Collett, David R. Schaefer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inherent to all social exchange relations are elements of both cooperation and competition. We develop and test a theoretical model which proposes that the relative salience of the competitive, conflictual elements of exchange mediate and explain the negative effects of negotiated exchange, as compared with reciprocal exchange, on actors' evaluations of fairness. By creating inequality within rather than across transactions, and by making relations between one actor's gain and another's cost more transparent, negotiated exchanges alter the relational context of exchange to one of competition and conflict and heighten actors' sense of unfairness. Results of experimental tests show that (1) the salience of conflict increases and perceived fairness decreases as we make reciprocal exchanges more like negotiated exchanges on dimensions of conflict, (2) the salience of conflict mediates and explains the relation between the form of exchange and perceived fairness, (3) conflict affects fairness directly rather than through self-serving attributions, and (4) regardless of the relative conflict in reciprocal exchange, actors reciprocally exchange with unfair partners far more often than they negotiate agreements with them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2331-2352
Number of pages22
JournalSocial Forces
Volume84
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

fairness
attribution
transaction
Fairness
costs
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2006). Conflict and fairness in social exchange. Social Forces, 84(4), 2331-2352. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0100

Conflict and fairness in social exchange. / Molm, Linda D.; Collett, Jessica L.; Schaefer, David R.

In: Social Forces, Vol. 84, No. 4, 06.2006, p. 2331-2352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Molm, LD, Collett, JL & Schaefer, DR 2006, 'Conflict and fairness in social exchange', Social Forces, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 2331-2352. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0100
Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR. Conflict and fairness in social exchange. Social Forces. 2006 Jun;84(4):2331-2352. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0100
Molm, Linda D. ; Collett, Jessica L. ; Schaefer, David R. / Conflict and fairness in social exchange. In: Social Forces. 2006 ; Vol. 84, No. 4. pp. 2331-2352.
@article{d4ab3490d2094e04afa8eb4605504eb4,
title = "Conflict and fairness in social exchange",
abstract = "Inherent to all social exchange relations are elements of both cooperation and competition. We develop and test a theoretical model which proposes that the relative salience of the competitive, conflictual elements of exchange mediate and explain the negative effects of negotiated exchange, as compared with reciprocal exchange, on actors' evaluations of fairness. By creating inequality within rather than across transactions, and by making relations between one actor's gain and another's cost more transparent, negotiated exchanges alter the relational context of exchange to one of competition and conflict and heighten actors' sense of unfairness. Results of experimental tests show that (1) the salience of conflict increases and perceived fairness decreases as we make reciprocal exchanges more like negotiated exchanges on dimensions of conflict, (2) the salience of conflict mediates and explains the relation between the form of exchange and perceived fairness, (3) conflict affects fairness directly rather than through self-serving attributions, and (4) regardless of the relative conflict in reciprocal exchange, actors reciprocally exchange with unfair partners far more often than they negotiate agreements with them.",
author = "Molm, {Linda D.} and Collett, {Jessica L.} and Schaefer, {David R.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1353/sof.2006.0100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "2331--2352",
journal = "Social Forces",
issn = "0037-7732",
publisher = "University of North Carolina Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict and fairness in social exchange

AU - Molm, Linda D.

AU - Collett, Jessica L.

AU - Schaefer, David R.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Inherent to all social exchange relations are elements of both cooperation and competition. We develop and test a theoretical model which proposes that the relative salience of the competitive, conflictual elements of exchange mediate and explain the negative effects of negotiated exchange, as compared with reciprocal exchange, on actors' evaluations of fairness. By creating inequality within rather than across transactions, and by making relations between one actor's gain and another's cost more transparent, negotiated exchanges alter the relational context of exchange to one of competition and conflict and heighten actors' sense of unfairness. Results of experimental tests show that (1) the salience of conflict increases and perceived fairness decreases as we make reciprocal exchanges more like negotiated exchanges on dimensions of conflict, (2) the salience of conflict mediates and explains the relation between the form of exchange and perceived fairness, (3) conflict affects fairness directly rather than through self-serving attributions, and (4) regardless of the relative conflict in reciprocal exchange, actors reciprocally exchange with unfair partners far more often than they negotiate agreements with them.

AB - Inherent to all social exchange relations are elements of both cooperation and competition. We develop and test a theoretical model which proposes that the relative salience of the competitive, conflictual elements of exchange mediate and explain the negative effects of negotiated exchange, as compared with reciprocal exchange, on actors' evaluations of fairness. By creating inequality within rather than across transactions, and by making relations between one actor's gain and another's cost more transparent, negotiated exchanges alter the relational context of exchange to one of competition and conflict and heighten actors' sense of unfairness. Results of experimental tests show that (1) the salience of conflict increases and perceived fairness decreases as we make reciprocal exchanges more like negotiated exchanges on dimensions of conflict, (2) the salience of conflict mediates and explains the relation between the form of exchange and perceived fairness, (3) conflict affects fairness directly rather than through self-serving attributions, and (4) regardless of the relative conflict in reciprocal exchange, actors reciprocally exchange with unfair partners far more often than they negotiate agreements with them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745960752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745960752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/sof.2006.0100

DO - 10.1353/sof.2006.0100

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33745960752

VL - 84

SP - 2331

EP - 2352

JO - Social Forces

JF - Social Forces

SN - 0037-7732

IS - 4

ER -