Conducting rapid, relevant research: Lessons learned from the my own health report project

Russell E. Glasgow, Rodger Kessler, Marcia G. Ory, Dylan Roby, Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin, Alex Krist

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The lengthy and uncertain translation of research into clinical practice is well documented. Much of the current "gold standard" clinical research is slow, expensive, and lacks perceived relevance for practitioners and decision makers. In contrast, we summarize experiences conducting the My Own Health Report (MOHR) project to collect and address patient reported measures using principles of rapid, relevant pragmatic research. The methods used for rapid design and fielding of the MOHR project to improve attention to health behaviors and mental health are detailed. Within the multisite, pragmatic, implementation-focused MOHR study, we describe the four phases of the research and the key decisions made and actions taken within each. We provide concrete examples of how relevant research can be conducted transparently to rapidly provide information to practitioners. Data were collected and analyzed in 2013. The multisite (seven research centers partnered with 18 clinics) cluster randomized pragmatic delayed intervention trial was conducted in less than 18 months from receipt of funding applications to completion of data collection. Phases that were especially accelerated included funding and review, and recruitment and implementation. Conducting complex studies rapidly and efficiently is a realistic goal. Key lessons learned for prevention research include use of existing research networks; use of web-based assessment/feedback tools that are tailored to fit local needs; engaging relevant stakeholders early on and throughout the process to minimize need for redesign; and making pragmatic decisions that balance internal and external validity concerns rather than waiting for perfect solutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-219
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Research
Health Behavior
Decision Making
Mental Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Conducting rapid, relevant research : Lessons learned from the my own health report project. / Glasgow, Russell E.; Kessler, Rodger; Ory, Marcia G.; Roby, Dylan; Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld; Krist, Alex.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 212-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Glasgow, Russell E. ; Kessler, Rodger ; Ory, Marcia G. ; Roby, Dylan ; Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld ; Krist, Alex. / Conducting rapid, relevant research : Lessons learned from the my own health report project. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 212-219.
@article{9f3c23d012fd446e86e945ca05316b82,
title = "Conducting rapid, relevant research: Lessons learned from the my own health report project",
abstract = "The lengthy and uncertain translation of research into clinical practice is well documented. Much of the current {"}gold standard{"} clinical research is slow, expensive, and lacks perceived relevance for practitioners and decision makers. In contrast, we summarize experiences conducting the My Own Health Report (MOHR) project to collect and address patient reported measures using principles of rapid, relevant pragmatic research. The methods used for rapid design and fielding of the MOHR project to improve attention to health behaviors and mental health are detailed. Within the multisite, pragmatic, implementation-focused MOHR study, we describe the four phases of the research and the key decisions made and actions taken within each. We provide concrete examples of how relevant research can be conducted transparently to rapidly provide information to practitioners. Data were collected and analyzed in 2013. The multisite (seven research centers partnered with 18 clinics) cluster randomized pragmatic delayed intervention trial was conducted in less than 18 months from receipt of funding applications to completion of data collection. Phases that were especially accelerated included funding and review, and recruitment and implementation. Conducting complex studies rapidly and efficiently is a realistic goal. Key lessons learned for prevention research include use of existing research networks; use of web-based assessment/feedback tools that are tailored to fit local needs; engaging relevant stakeholders early on and throughout the process to minimize need for redesign; and making pragmatic decisions that balance internal and external validity concerns rather than waiting for perfect solutions.",
author = "Glasgow, {Russell E.} and Rodger Kessler and Ory, {Marcia G.} and Dylan Roby and Gorin, {Sherri Sheinfeld} and Alex Krist",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "212--219",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conducting rapid, relevant research

T2 - Lessons learned from the my own health report project

AU - Glasgow, Russell E.

AU - Kessler, Rodger

AU - Ory, Marcia G.

AU - Roby, Dylan

AU - Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld

AU - Krist, Alex

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The lengthy and uncertain translation of research into clinical practice is well documented. Much of the current "gold standard" clinical research is slow, expensive, and lacks perceived relevance for practitioners and decision makers. In contrast, we summarize experiences conducting the My Own Health Report (MOHR) project to collect and address patient reported measures using principles of rapid, relevant pragmatic research. The methods used for rapid design and fielding of the MOHR project to improve attention to health behaviors and mental health are detailed. Within the multisite, pragmatic, implementation-focused MOHR study, we describe the four phases of the research and the key decisions made and actions taken within each. We provide concrete examples of how relevant research can be conducted transparently to rapidly provide information to practitioners. Data were collected and analyzed in 2013. The multisite (seven research centers partnered with 18 clinics) cluster randomized pragmatic delayed intervention trial was conducted in less than 18 months from receipt of funding applications to completion of data collection. Phases that were especially accelerated included funding and review, and recruitment and implementation. Conducting complex studies rapidly and efficiently is a realistic goal. Key lessons learned for prevention research include use of existing research networks; use of web-based assessment/feedback tools that are tailored to fit local needs; engaging relevant stakeholders early on and throughout the process to minimize need for redesign; and making pragmatic decisions that balance internal and external validity concerns rather than waiting for perfect solutions.

AB - The lengthy and uncertain translation of research into clinical practice is well documented. Much of the current "gold standard" clinical research is slow, expensive, and lacks perceived relevance for practitioners and decision makers. In contrast, we summarize experiences conducting the My Own Health Report (MOHR) project to collect and address patient reported measures using principles of rapid, relevant pragmatic research. The methods used for rapid design and fielding of the MOHR project to improve attention to health behaviors and mental health are detailed. Within the multisite, pragmatic, implementation-focused MOHR study, we describe the four phases of the research and the key decisions made and actions taken within each. We provide concrete examples of how relevant research can be conducted transparently to rapidly provide information to practitioners. Data were collected and analyzed in 2013. The multisite (seven research centers partnered with 18 clinics) cluster randomized pragmatic delayed intervention trial was conducted in less than 18 months from receipt of funding applications to completion of data collection. Phases that were especially accelerated included funding and review, and recruitment and implementation. Conducting complex studies rapidly and efficiently is a realistic goal. Key lessons learned for prevention research include use of existing research networks; use of web-based assessment/feedback tools that are tailored to fit local needs; engaging relevant stakeholders early on and throughout the process to minimize need for redesign; and making pragmatic decisions that balance internal and external validity concerns rather than waiting for perfect solutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904650343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904650343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.007

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24953520

AN - SCOPUS:84904650343

VL - 47

SP - 212

EP - 219

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 2

ER -