Conduct problems and peer rejection in childhood: A randomized trial of the making choices and strong families programs

Mark W. Fraser, Steven H. Day, Maeda J. Galinsky, Vanessa G. Hodges, Paul R. Smokowski

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    42 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This article discusses the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention designed to disrupt developmental processes associated with conduct problems and peer rejection in childhood. Compared with 41 children randomized to a wait list control condition, 45 children in an intervention condition received a social skills training program. At the same time, their parents participated in an in-home family intervention. Compared with control group children, intervention children demonstrated significant improvements on five of six outcome measures. Differences between the experimental and control groups suggest the programs strengthen children's prosocial behavior, promote their ability to regulate emotions, and increase social contact with peers. Intervention also was associated with significant improvements in classroom comportment and decreases in relational aggression, a measure of coercion in peer relationships. The findings are consistent with those of other pro grams effective in interrupting risk processes associated with conduct problems in childhood and early adolescence.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)313-324
    Number of pages12
    JournalResearch on Social Work Practice
    Volume14
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2004

    Keywords

    • Children
    • Conduct problems
    • Experiment
    • Intervention
    • Peer rejection

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • General Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conduct problems and peer rejection in childhood: A randomized trial of the making choices and strong families programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this