Conclusion

Bertha Manninen, Jack Mulder

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In this book, we have discussed our reasons for being pro-choice and pro-life in regard to the abortion issue. We have also glimpsed some agreement on related issues that, we think, springs from the reasons we take the positions we do. Some recap is probably useful. On a range of issues concerning social justice, we can say we have considerable agreement. We both think that there should be serious societal measures against poverty, for family leave, against racial injustice, for prisoners, against the death penalty, and for our earth and its environment. A “hands-off” approach that seems to characterize some libertarian visions at the level of government strikes both of us as problematic. We also have some common ground on issues of sexual ethics. This is because we both think that delaying sexual activity in young people is an important goal to have, since sex among young people often fails certain basic ethical norms (some as basic as Kantian norms requiring that one’s partner be viewed as a full person in her own right). We also agree that popular media has a strongly pedagogical hand in the mischief, as does pornography, and that we cannot reasonably expect healthy sexual behavior from a society whose chief forms of entertainment do not model it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCivil Dialogue on Abortion
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages213-215
Number of pages3
ISBN (Electronic)9781351819244
ISBN (Print)9781138205864
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Government
Pornography
Person
Prisoners
Abortion
Death Penalty
Sexual Behavior
Immanuel Kant
Social Justice
Entertainment
Sexual
Mischief
Injustice
Poverty
Sexual Ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Manninen, B., & Mulder, J. (2018). Conclusion. In Civil Dialogue on Abortion (pp. 213-215). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213651

Conclusion. / Manninen, Bertha; Mulder, Jack.

Civil Dialogue on Abortion. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 213-215.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Manninen, B & Mulder, J 2018, Conclusion. in Civil Dialogue on Abortion. Taylor and Francis, pp. 213-215. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213651
Manninen B, Mulder J. Conclusion. In Civil Dialogue on Abortion. Taylor and Francis. 2018. p. 213-215 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213651
Manninen, Bertha ; Mulder, Jack. / Conclusion. Civil Dialogue on Abortion. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 213-215
@inbook{fa96466fca9e4ea5a4363aa6ccf87d2a,
title = "Conclusion",
abstract = "In this book, we have discussed our reasons for being pro-choice and pro-life in regard to the abortion issue. We have also glimpsed some agreement on related issues that, we think, springs from the reasons we take the positions we do. Some recap is probably useful. On a range of issues concerning social justice, we can say we have considerable agreement. We both think that there should be serious societal measures against poverty, for family leave, against racial injustice, for prisoners, against the death penalty, and for our earth and its environment. A “hands-off” approach that seems to characterize some libertarian visions at the level of government strikes both of us as problematic. We also have some common ground on issues of sexual ethics. This is because we both think that delaying sexual activity in young people is an important goal to have, since sex among young people often fails certain basic ethical norms (some as basic as Kantian norms requiring that one’s partner be viewed as a full person in her own right). We also agree that popular media has a strongly pedagogical hand in the mischief, as does pornography, and that we cannot reasonably expect healthy sexual behavior from a society whose chief forms of entertainment do not model it.",
author = "Bertha Manninen and Jack Mulder",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315213651",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138205864",
pages = "213--215",
booktitle = "Civil Dialogue on Abortion",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conclusion

AU - Manninen, Bertha

AU - Mulder, Jack

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In this book, we have discussed our reasons for being pro-choice and pro-life in regard to the abortion issue. We have also glimpsed some agreement on related issues that, we think, springs from the reasons we take the positions we do. Some recap is probably useful. On a range of issues concerning social justice, we can say we have considerable agreement. We both think that there should be serious societal measures against poverty, for family leave, against racial injustice, for prisoners, against the death penalty, and for our earth and its environment. A “hands-off” approach that seems to characterize some libertarian visions at the level of government strikes both of us as problematic. We also have some common ground on issues of sexual ethics. This is because we both think that delaying sexual activity in young people is an important goal to have, since sex among young people often fails certain basic ethical norms (some as basic as Kantian norms requiring that one’s partner be viewed as a full person in her own right). We also agree that popular media has a strongly pedagogical hand in the mischief, as does pornography, and that we cannot reasonably expect healthy sexual behavior from a society whose chief forms of entertainment do not model it.

AB - In this book, we have discussed our reasons for being pro-choice and pro-life in regard to the abortion issue. We have also glimpsed some agreement on related issues that, we think, springs from the reasons we take the positions we do. Some recap is probably useful. On a range of issues concerning social justice, we can say we have considerable agreement. We both think that there should be serious societal measures against poverty, for family leave, against racial injustice, for prisoners, against the death penalty, and for our earth and its environment. A “hands-off” approach that seems to characterize some libertarian visions at the level of government strikes both of us as problematic. We also have some common ground on issues of sexual ethics. This is because we both think that delaying sexual activity in young people is an important goal to have, since sex among young people often fails certain basic ethical norms (some as basic as Kantian norms requiring that one’s partner be viewed as a full person in her own right). We also agree that popular media has a strongly pedagogical hand in the mischief, as does pornography, and that we cannot reasonably expect healthy sexual behavior from a society whose chief forms of entertainment do not model it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048687974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048687974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315213651

DO - 10.4324/9781315213651

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138205864

SP - 213

EP - 215

BT - Civil Dialogue on Abortion

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -