Conceptualizing lenses, dimensions, constructs, and indicators for urban park quality

Elizabeth Corley, Jeong Joo Ahn, Yushim Kim, Joanna Lucio, Erin Rugland, Angel Luis Molina

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Social and environmental quality are essential components of urban parks, yet they are difficult to define and measure systematically and comprehensively across different types of parks. To simplify this issue, scholars have often equated park size with quality. However, we argue that there are many other significant aspects of park quality in addition to park size, which include constructs such as safety, access, amenities, social inclusion, aesthetics, and ecological vitality. Even though these additional constructs might be difficult to define and measure, they are relevant aspects of park quality. Since access, safety, and aesthetics might be less available in parks in lower socioeconomic or racially diverse neighborhoods, these are especially important for a comprehensive definition of urban park quality. To accurately compare urban park quality across parks in different geographical areas, a more systematic and comprehensive definition of park quality is needed. The goal of this study is to combine various strands of the literature for the purpose of advancing a conceptual model that defines social and environmental quality constructs, such as those focused on access, amenities, safety, social inclusion, aesthetics, and ecological vitality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)208-221
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Justice
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

esthetics
Esthetics
Lenses
social inclusion
amenity
safety
Safety
environmental quality
aesthetics
indicator
Recreational Parks
inclusion

Keywords

  • conceptual model
  • environmental justice
  • green space
  • urban park quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Conceptualizing lenses, dimensions, constructs, and indicators for urban park quality. / Corley, Elizabeth; Ahn, Jeong Joo; Kim, Yushim; Lucio, Joanna; Rugland, Erin; Molina, Angel Luis.

In: Environmental Justice, Vol. 11, No. 6, 01.12.2018, p. 208-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{16e415b51c294b0584ad7116a72187c4,
title = "Conceptualizing lenses, dimensions, constructs, and indicators for urban park quality",
abstract = "Social and environmental quality are essential components of urban parks, yet they are difficult to define and measure systematically and comprehensively across different types of parks. To simplify this issue, scholars have often equated park size with quality. However, we argue that there are many other significant aspects of park quality in addition to park size, which include constructs such as safety, access, amenities, social inclusion, aesthetics, and ecological vitality. Even though these additional constructs might be difficult to define and measure, they are relevant aspects of park quality. Since access, safety, and aesthetics might be less available in parks in lower socioeconomic or racially diverse neighborhoods, these are especially important for a comprehensive definition of urban park quality. To accurately compare urban park quality across parks in different geographical areas, a more systematic and comprehensive definition of park quality is needed. The goal of this study is to combine various strands of the literature for the purpose of advancing a conceptual model that defines social and environmental quality constructs, such as those focused on access, amenities, safety, social inclusion, aesthetics, and ecological vitality.",
keywords = "conceptual model, environmental justice, green space, urban park quality",
author = "Elizabeth Corley and Ahn, {Jeong Joo} and Yushim Kim and Joanna Lucio and Erin Rugland and Molina, {Angel Luis}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/env.2018.0017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "208--221",
journal = "Environmental Justice",
issn = "1939-4071",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualizing lenses, dimensions, constructs, and indicators for urban park quality

AU - Corley, Elizabeth

AU - Ahn, Jeong Joo

AU - Kim, Yushim

AU - Lucio, Joanna

AU - Rugland, Erin

AU - Molina, Angel Luis

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Social and environmental quality are essential components of urban parks, yet they are difficult to define and measure systematically and comprehensively across different types of parks. To simplify this issue, scholars have often equated park size with quality. However, we argue that there are many other significant aspects of park quality in addition to park size, which include constructs such as safety, access, amenities, social inclusion, aesthetics, and ecological vitality. Even though these additional constructs might be difficult to define and measure, they are relevant aspects of park quality. Since access, safety, and aesthetics might be less available in parks in lower socioeconomic or racially diverse neighborhoods, these are especially important for a comprehensive definition of urban park quality. To accurately compare urban park quality across parks in different geographical areas, a more systematic and comprehensive definition of park quality is needed. The goal of this study is to combine various strands of the literature for the purpose of advancing a conceptual model that defines social and environmental quality constructs, such as those focused on access, amenities, safety, social inclusion, aesthetics, and ecological vitality.

AB - Social and environmental quality are essential components of urban parks, yet they are difficult to define and measure systematically and comprehensively across different types of parks. To simplify this issue, scholars have often equated park size with quality. However, we argue that there are many other significant aspects of park quality in addition to park size, which include constructs such as safety, access, amenities, social inclusion, aesthetics, and ecological vitality. Even though these additional constructs might be difficult to define and measure, they are relevant aspects of park quality. Since access, safety, and aesthetics might be less available in parks in lower socioeconomic or racially diverse neighborhoods, these are especially important for a comprehensive definition of urban park quality. To accurately compare urban park quality across parks in different geographical areas, a more systematic and comprehensive definition of park quality is needed. The goal of this study is to combine various strands of the literature for the purpose of advancing a conceptual model that defines social and environmental quality constructs, such as those focused on access, amenities, safety, social inclusion, aesthetics, and ecological vitality.

KW - conceptual model

KW - environmental justice

KW - green space

KW - urban park quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057721215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057721215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/env.2018.0017

DO - 10.1089/env.2018.0017

M3 - Review article

VL - 11

SP - 208

EP - 221

JO - Environmental Justice

JF - Environmental Justice

SN - 1939-4071

IS - 6

ER -