Conceptualizing and Measuring Transformational and Transactional Leadership

Ulrich Jensen, Lotte Bøgh Andersen, Louise Ladegaard Bro, Anne Bøllingtoft, Tine Louise Mundbjerg Eriksen, Ann Louise Holten, Christian Bøtcher Jacobsen, Jacob Ladenburg, Poul Aaes Nielsen, Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen, Niels Westergård-Nielsen, Allan Würtz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Existing conceptualizations and measures of transformational and transactional leadership have unclear theoretical bases, confound leadership and its effects, and are not necessarily suitable for public organizations. Overcoming these problems is necessary to test how leadership affects performance. Many public administration scholars apply the concepts, emphasizing the need to ensure that the concepts are applicable in both public and private organizations. The article reconceptualizes transformational and transactional leadership and develops and tests revised measures that can be employed on employees and leaders, are robust in terms of repeated use by the same respondents, and are applicable to public and private organizations alike.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-33
Number of pages31
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Keywords

  • measurement validity
  • private organizations
  • public organizations
  • transactional leadership
  • transformational leadership

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualizing and Measuring Transformational and Transactional Leadership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Jensen, U., Andersen, L. B., Bro, L. L., Bøllingtoft, A., Eriksen, T. L. M., Holten, A. L., Jacobsen, C. B., Ladenburg, J., Nielsen, P. A., Salomonsen, H. H., Westergård-Nielsen, N., & Würtz, A. (2019). Conceptualizing and Measuring Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Administration and Society, 51(1), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716667157