Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches

Mansour Javidan, Robert J. House, Peter W. Dorfman, Paul J. Hanges, Mary Sully de Luque

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

394 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explains why GLOBE used a set of cultural values and practices to measure national cultures. We show why there is no theoretical or empirical basis for Hofstede's criticism that GLOBE measures of values are too abstract or for his contention that national and organizational cultures are phenomena of different order. We also show why Hofstede has a limited understanding of the relationship between national wealth and culture. Furthermore, we explain why Hofstede's reanalysis of the GLOBE data is inappropriate and produces incomprehensible results. We also show the validity of managerial samples in studying leadership. Finally, we explain why Hofstede's claim that GLOBE instruments reflect researchers psycho-logic reveals ignorance of psychometric methodologies designed to ensure scale reliability and construct validity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)897-914
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of International Business Studies
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 14 2006

Fingerprint

Hofstede
National cultures
Organizational culture
Cultural practices
Logic
Cultural values
Construct validity
Criticism
National wealth
Methodology
Psychometrics
Ignorance

Keywords

  • Cross cultural leadership
  • Cross cultural management
  • GLOBE
  • International management
  • National culture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences : A comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches. / Javidan, Mansour; House, Robert J.; Dorfman, Peter W.; Hanges, Paul J.; Sully de Luque, Mary.

In: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37, No. 6, 14.11.2006, p. 897-914.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eed534b690d840a6ab1f17ed750261b7,
title = "Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches",
abstract = "This paper explains why GLOBE used a set of cultural values and practices to measure national cultures. We show why there is no theoretical or empirical basis for Hofstede's criticism that GLOBE measures of values are too abstract or for his contention that national and organizational cultures are phenomena of different order. We also show why Hofstede has a limited understanding of the relationship between national wealth and culture. Furthermore, we explain why Hofstede's reanalysis of the GLOBE data is inappropriate and produces incomprehensible results. We also show the validity of managerial samples in studying leadership. Finally, we explain why Hofstede's claim that GLOBE instruments reflect researchers psycho-logic reveals ignorance of psychometric methodologies designed to ensure scale reliability and construct validity.",
keywords = "Cross cultural leadership, Cross cultural management, GLOBE, International management, National culture",
author = "Mansour Javidan and House, {Robert J.} and Dorfman, {Peter W.} and Hanges, {Paul J.} and {Sully de Luque}, Mary",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400234",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "897--914",
journal = "Journal of International Business Studies",
issn = "0047-2506",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences

T2 - A comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches

AU - Javidan, Mansour

AU - House, Robert J.

AU - Dorfman, Peter W.

AU - Hanges, Paul J.

AU - Sully de Luque, Mary

PY - 2006/11/14

Y1 - 2006/11/14

N2 - This paper explains why GLOBE used a set of cultural values and practices to measure national cultures. We show why there is no theoretical or empirical basis for Hofstede's criticism that GLOBE measures of values are too abstract or for his contention that national and organizational cultures are phenomena of different order. We also show why Hofstede has a limited understanding of the relationship between national wealth and culture. Furthermore, we explain why Hofstede's reanalysis of the GLOBE data is inappropriate and produces incomprehensible results. We also show the validity of managerial samples in studying leadership. Finally, we explain why Hofstede's claim that GLOBE instruments reflect researchers psycho-logic reveals ignorance of psychometric methodologies designed to ensure scale reliability and construct validity.

AB - This paper explains why GLOBE used a set of cultural values and practices to measure national cultures. We show why there is no theoretical or empirical basis for Hofstede's criticism that GLOBE measures of values are too abstract or for his contention that national and organizational cultures are phenomena of different order. We also show why Hofstede has a limited understanding of the relationship between national wealth and culture. Furthermore, we explain why Hofstede's reanalysis of the GLOBE data is inappropriate and produces incomprehensible results. We also show the validity of managerial samples in studying leadership. Finally, we explain why Hofstede's claim that GLOBE instruments reflect researchers psycho-logic reveals ignorance of psychometric methodologies designed to ensure scale reliability and construct validity.

KW - Cross cultural leadership

KW - Cross cultural management

KW - GLOBE

KW - International management

KW - National culture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750883906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750883906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400234

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400234

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33750883906

VL - 37

SP - 897

EP - 914

JO - Journal of International Business Studies

JF - Journal of International Business Studies

SN - 0047-2506

IS - 6

ER -