Computerised clinical reminders use in an integrated heathcare system

Constance H. Fung, Jerry Tsai, Armine Lulejian, Peter Glassman, Emily Patterson, Bradley Doebbeling, Steven Asch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine levels of routine computerised clinical reminder use in a nationwide sample of primary care physicians and to identify factors influencing reminder use. Design: Cross-sectional using a self-administered questionnaire. Setting: The United States Veterans Health Administration. Methods: Survey responses from 461 VHA primary care physicians sampled from across the Veterans Health Administration were sampled and analysed. We asked physicians how many computerised clinical reminders they use per patient per visit and when they typically use computerised clinical reminders in their clinics. Measured physician characteristics included age, gender, year of medical degree, number of days in clinic per week, and attitudes towards computerised clinical reminders (measured on Likert-like scales). We used multivariable linear regression to determine factors associated with greater use of computerised clinical reminders per patient per visit. Results: Average computerised clinical reminder use per patient visit was 4.2 (SD = 2.5). Eighty-six percent of physicians resolve reminders during the visit. In a multivariable regression model, a higher score on the team factors scale is associated with use of more reminders (increase of 0.24 reminders for each unit increase on the team factors scale, or one extra reminder for each four unit increase in the team factor scale). Working more days in clinic is associated with use of more reminders per patient visit (increase of 0.13 reminders for each extra half-day of clinic per week, or about one additional reminder for physicians working ten half-days per week versus physicians working two half-days per week). Academic facility affiliation is associated with one less reminder used per patient visit as compared with no affiliation. Conclusions: Most United States Veterans Health Administration primary care physicians use computerised clinical reminders, typically during the patient visit. Strategies to increase reminder use should focus on improving physicians' understanding of their role in completing reminder-related tasks and improving usability for users such as physicians who work in clinic less frequently.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-156
Number of pages13
JournalJournal on Information Technology in Healthcare
Volume7
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physicians
Veterans Health
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Primary Care Physicians
Linear Models
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Fung, C. H., Tsai, J., Lulejian, A., Glassman, P., Patterson, E., Doebbeling, B., & Asch, S. (2009). Computerised clinical reminders use in an integrated heathcare system. Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare, 7(3), 144-156.

Computerised clinical reminders use in an integrated heathcare system. / Fung, Constance H.; Tsai, Jerry; Lulejian, Armine; Glassman, Peter; Patterson, Emily; Doebbeling, Bradley; Asch, Steven.

In: Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2009, p. 144-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fung, CH, Tsai, J, Lulejian, A, Glassman, P, Patterson, E, Doebbeling, B & Asch, S 2009, 'Computerised clinical reminders use in an integrated heathcare system', Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 144-156.
Fung, Constance H. ; Tsai, Jerry ; Lulejian, Armine ; Glassman, Peter ; Patterson, Emily ; Doebbeling, Bradley ; Asch, Steven. / Computerised clinical reminders use in an integrated heathcare system. In: Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare. 2009 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 144-156.
@article{d81dbf08237f49b2983d0ea92fea3287,
title = "Computerised clinical reminders use in an integrated heathcare system",
abstract = "Objective: To examine levels of routine computerised clinical reminder use in a nationwide sample of primary care physicians and to identify factors influencing reminder use. Design: Cross-sectional using a self-administered questionnaire. Setting: The United States Veterans Health Administration. Methods: Survey responses from 461 VHA primary care physicians sampled from across the Veterans Health Administration were sampled and analysed. We asked physicians how many computerised clinical reminders they use per patient per visit and when they typically use computerised clinical reminders in their clinics. Measured physician characteristics included age, gender, year of medical degree, number of days in clinic per week, and attitudes towards computerised clinical reminders (measured on Likert-like scales). We used multivariable linear regression to determine factors associated with greater use of computerised clinical reminders per patient per visit. Results: Average computerised clinical reminder use per patient visit was 4.2 (SD = 2.5). Eighty-six percent of physicians resolve reminders during the visit. In a multivariable regression model, a higher score on the team factors scale is associated with use of more reminders (increase of 0.24 reminders for each unit increase on the team factors scale, or one extra reminder for each four unit increase in the team factor scale). Working more days in clinic is associated with use of more reminders per patient visit (increase of 0.13 reminders for each extra half-day of clinic per week, or about one additional reminder for physicians working ten half-days per week versus physicians working two half-days per week). Academic facility affiliation is associated with one less reminder used per patient visit as compared with no affiliation. Conclusions: Most United States Veterans Health Administration primary care physicians use computerised clinical reminders, typically during the patient visit. Strategies to increase reminder use should focus on improving physicians' understanding of their role in completing reminder-related tasks and improving usability for users such as physicians who work in clinic less frequently.",
author = "Fung, {Constance H.} and Jerry Tsai and Armine Lulejian and Peter Glassman and Emily Patterson and Bradley Doebbeling and Steven Asch",
year = "2009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "144--156",
journal = "Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare",
issn = "1479-649X",
publisher = "Optimum",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computerised clinical reminders use in an integrated heathcare system

AU - Fung, Constance H.

AU - Tsai, Jerry

AU - Lulejian, Armine

AU - Glassman, Peter

AU - Patterson, Emily

AU - Doebbeling, Bradley

AU - Asch, Steven

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Objective: To examine levels of routine computerised clinical reminder use in a nationwide sample of primary care physicians and to identify factors influencing reminder use. Design: Cross-sectional using a self-administered questionnaire. Setting: The United States Veterans Health Administration. Methods: Survey responses from 461 VHA primary care physicians sampled from across the Veterans Health Administration were sampled and analysed. We asked physicians how many computerised clinical reminders they use per patient per visit and when they typically use computerised clinical reminders in their clinics. Measured physician characteristics included age, gender, year of medical degree, number of days in clinic per week, and attitudes towards computerised clinical reminders (measured on Likert-like scales). We used multivariable linear regression to determine factors associated with greater use of computerised clinical reminders per patient per visit. Results: Average computerised clinical reminder use per patient visit was 4.2 (SD = 2.5). Eighty-six percent of physicians resolve reminders during the visit. In a multivariable regression model, a higher score on the team factors scale is associated with use of more reminders (increase of 0.24 reminders for each unit increase on the team factors scale, or one extra reminder for each four unit increase in the team factor scale). Working more days in clinic is associated with use of more reminders per patient visit (increase of 0.13 reminders for each extra half-day of clinic per week, or about one additional reminder for physicians working ten half-days per week versus physicians working two half-days per week). Academic facility affiliation is associated with one less reminder used per patient visit as compared with no affiliation. Conclusions: Most United States Veterans Health Administration primary care physicians use computerised clinical reminders, typically during the patient visit. Strategies to increase reminder use should focus on improving physicians' understanding of their role in completing reminder-related tasks and improving usability for users such as physicians who work in clinic less frequently.

AB - Objective: To examine levels of routine computerised clinical reminder use in a nationwide sample of primary care physicians and to identify factors influencing reminder use. Design: Cross-sectional using a self-administered questionnaire. Setting: The United States Veterans Health Administration. Methods: Survey responses from 461 VHA primary care physicians sampled from across the Veterans Health Administration were sampled and analysed. We asked physicians how many computerised clinical reminders they use per patient per visit and when they typically use computerised clinical reminders in their clinics. Measured physician characteristics included age, gender, year of medical degree, number of days in clinic per week, and attitudes towards computerised clinical reminders (measured on Likert-like scales). We used multivariable linear regression to determine factors associated with greater use of computerised clinical reminders per patient per visit. Results: Average computerised clinical reminder use per patient visit was 4.2 (SD = 2.5). Eighty-six percent of physicians resolve reminders during the visit. In a multivariable regression model, a higher score on the team factors scale is associated with use of more reminders (increase of 0.24 reminders for each unit increase on the team factors scale, or one extra reminder for each four unit increase in the team factor scale). Working more days in clinic is associated with use of more reminders per patient visit (increase of 0.13 reminders for each extra half-day of clinic per week, or about one additional reminder for physicians working ten half-days per week versus physicians working two half-days per week). Academic facility affiliation is associated with one less reminder used per patient visit as compared with no affiliation. Conclusions: Most United States Veterans Health Administration primary care physicians use computerised clinical reminders, typically during the patient visit. Strategies to increase reminder use should focus on improving physicians' understanding of their role in completing reminder-related tasks and improving usability for users such as physicians who work in clinic less frequently.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749089843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68749089843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:68749089843

VL - 7

SP - 144

EP - 156

JO - Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare

JF - Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare

SN - 1479-649X

IS - 3

ER -