Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension

Arthur C. Graesser, Danielle S. McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Scopus citations

Abstract

The proposed multilevel framework of discourse comprehension includes the surface code, the textbase, the situation model, the genre and rhetorical structure, and the pragmatic communication level. We describe these five levels when comprehension succeeds and also when there are communication misalignments and comprehension breakdowns. A computer tool has been developed, called Coh-Metrix, that scales discourse (oral or print) on dozens of measures associated with the first four discourse levels. The measurement of these levels with an automated tool helps researchers track and better understand multilevel discourse comprehension. Two sets of analyses illustrate the utility of Coh-Metrix in discourse theory and educational practice. First, Coh-Metrix was used to measure the cohesion of the text base and situation model, as well as potential extraneous variables, in a sample of published studies that manipulated text cohesion. This analysis helped us better understand what was precisely manipulated in these studies and the implications for discourse comprehension mechanisms. Second, Coh-Metrix analyses are reported for samples of narrative and science texts in order to advance the argument that traditional text difficulty measures are limited because they fail to accommodate most of the levels of the multilevel discourse comprehension framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-398
Number of pages28
JournalTopics in Cognitive Science
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Coherence
  • Cohesion
  • Computational linguistics
  • Discourse processes
  • Semantics
  • Text comprehension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this