Complexity and the productivity of innovation

Deborah Strumsky, Jose Lobo, Joseph A. Tainter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Innovation underpins the industrial way of life. It is assumed implicitly both that it will continue to do so, and that it will produce solutions to the problems we face involving climate and resources. These assumptions underlie the thinking of many economists and the political leaders whom they influence. Such a view assumes that innovation in the future will be as productive as it has been in the recent past. To test whether this is likely to be so, we investigate the productivity of innovation in the United States using data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The results suggest that the conventional optimistic view may be unwarranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)496-509
Number of pages14
JournalSystems Research and Behavioral Science
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

Fingerprint

productivity
innovation
trademark
way of life
patent
economist
climate
leader
resources
Innovation
Productivity
Resources
Economists
Trademark
Climate
Patents

Keywords

  • Complexity
  • Economic theory
  • History of science
  • Innovation
  • Patents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

Complexity and the productivity of innovation. / Strumsky, Deborah; Lobo, Jose; Tainter, Joseph A.

In: Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 27, No. 5, 01.09.2010, p. 496-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Strumsky, Deborah ; Lobo, Jose ; Tainter, Joseph A. / Complexity and the productivity of innovation. In: Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2010 ; Vol. 27, No. 5. pp. 496-509.
@article{8d8a0f44db1e44d795a0a3b484473ae8,
title = "Complexity and the productivity of innovation",
abstract = "Innovation underpins the industrial way of life. It is assumed implicitly both that it will continue to do so, and that it will produce solutions to the problems we face involving climate and resources. These assumptions underlie the thinking of many economists and the political leaders whom they influence. Such a view assumes that innovation in the future will be as productive as it has been in the recent past. To test whether this is likely to be so, we investigate the productivity of innovation in the United States using data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The results suggest that the conventional optimistic view may be unwarranted.",
keywords = "Complexity, Economic theory, History of science, Innovation, Patents",
author = "Deborah Strumsky and Jose Lobo and Tainter, {Joseph A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/sres.1057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "496--509",
journal = "Systems Research and Behavioral Science",
issn = "1092-7026",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complexity and the productivity of innovation

AU - Strumsky, Deborah

AU - Lobo, Jose

AU - Tainter, Joseph A.

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - Innovation underpins the industrial way of life. It is assumed implicitly both that it will continue to do so, and that it will produce solutions to the problems we face involving climate and resources. These assumptions underlie the thinking of many economists and the political leaders whom they influence. Such a view assumes that innovation in the future will be as productive as it has been in the recent past. To test whether this is likely to be so, we investigate the productivity of innovation in the United States using data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The results suggest that the conventional optimistic view may be unwarranted.

AB - Innovation underpins the industrial way of life. It is assumed implicitly both that it will continue to do so, and that it will produce solutions to the problems we face involving climate and resources. These assumptions underlie the thinking of many economists and the political leaders whom they influence. Such a view assumes that innovation in the future will be as productive as it has been in the recent past. To test whether this is likely to be so, we investigate the productivity of innovation in the United States using data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The results suggest that the conventional optimistic view may be unwarranted.

KW - Complexity

KW - Economic theory

KW - History of science

KW - Innovation

KW - Patents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649716170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649716170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sres.1057

DO - 10.1002/sres.1057

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78649716170

VL - 27

SP - 496

EP - 509

JO - Systems Research and Behavioral Science

JF - Systems Research and Behavioral Science

SN - 1092-7026

IS - 5

ER -