Complex defect in pyrite and its structure model derived from geometric phase analysis

Péter Németh, István Dódony, Mihály Pósfai, P R Buseck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

New methods for defect analysis can lead to improved interpretation of experimental data and thus better understanding of material properties. Although transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been used to study defects for many decades, interpretive ambiguities can arise for cases that seem simple or even trivial. Using geometric phase analysis (GPA), an image processing procedure, we show that an apparent simple line defect in pyrite has an entirely different character. It appears to be a b = [100] edge dislocation as viewed in a [001] high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image, but the measured u x and u y displacements are asymmetric, which is inconsistent with a simple line dislocation. Instead, the defect is best understood as a terminating {101} marcasite slab in pyrite. The simulated HRTEM image based on this model reproduces the defect contrast and illustrates the power of GPA analysis for (1) avoiding potential pitfalls of misinterpreting apparently simple defects in HRTEM images, (2) detecting differences in elastic properties at the atomic scale, and (3) providing data for the positions of atom columns, thereby facilitating the construction of structure models for complex defects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1303-1307
Number of pages5
JournalMicroscopy and Microanalysis
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Pyrites
pyrites
Model structures
Defects
defects
transmission electron microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy
high resolution
Edge dislocations
edge dislocations
High resolution transmission electron microscopy
stopping
ambiguity
image processing
Materials properties
slabs
Image processing
elastic properties
Atoms
atoms

Keywords

  • asymmetric displacement
  • geometric phase analysis
  • marcasite
  • pyrite defect
  • variations of elastic properties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Instrumentation

Cite this

Complex defect in pyrite and its structure model derived from geometric phase analysis. / Németh, Péter; Dódony, István; Pósfai, Mihály; Buseck, P R.

In: Microscopy and Microanalysis, Vol. 19, No. 5, 10.2013, p. 1303-1307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Németh, Péter ; Dódony, István ; Pósfai, Mihály ; Buseck, P R. / Complex defect in pyrite and its structure model derived from geometric phase analysis. In: Microscopy and Microanalysis. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 1303-1307.
@article{f7db1c8cb09e419091d128a7390af920,
title = "Complex defect in pyrite and its structure model derived from geometric phase analysis",
abstract = "New methods for defect analysis can lead to improved interpretation of experimental data and thus better understanding of material properties. Although transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been used to study defects for many decades, interpretive ambiguities can arise for cases that seem simple or even trivial. Using geometric phase analysis (GPA), an image processing procedure, we show that an apparent simple line defect in pyrite has an entirely different character. It appears to be a b = [100] edge dislocation as viewed in a [001] high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image, but the measured u x and u y displacements are asymmetric, which is inconsistent with a simple line dislocation. Instead, the defect is best understood as a terminating {101} marcasite slab in pyrite. The simulated HRTEM image based on this model reproduces the defect contrast and illustrates the power of GPA analysis for (1) avoiding potential pitfalls of misinterpreting apparently simple defects in HRTEM images, (2) detecting differences in elastic properties at the atomic scale, and (3) providing data for the positions of atom columns, thereby facilitating the construction of structure models for complex defects.",
keywords = "asymmetric displacement, geometric phase analysis, marcasite, pyrite defect, variations of elastic properties",
author = "P{\'e}ter N{\'e}meth and Istv{\'a}n D{\'o}dony and Mih{\'a}ly P{\'o}sfai and Buseck, {P R}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1017/S1431927613001839",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1303--1307",
journal = "Microscopy and Microanalysis",
issn = "1431-9276",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complex defect in pyrite and its structure model derived from geometric phase analysis

AU - Németh, Péter

AU - Dódony, István

AU - Pósfai, Mihály

AU - Buseck, P R

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - New methods for defect analysis can lead to improved interpretation of experimental data and thus better understanding of material properties. Although transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been used to study defects for many decades, interpretive ambiguities can arise for cases that seem simple or even trivial. Using geometric phase analysis (GPA), an image processing procedure, we show that an apparent simple line defect in pyrite has an entirely different character. It appears to be a b = [100] edge dislocation as viewed in a [001] high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image, but the measured u x and u y displacements are asymmetric, which is inconsistent with a simple line dislocation. Instead, the defect is best understood as a terminating {101} marcasite slab in pyrite. The simulated HRTEM image based on this model reproduces the defect contrast and illustrates the power of GPA analysis for (1) avoiding potential pitfalls of misinterpreting apparently simple defects in HRTEM images, (2) detecting differences in elastic properties at the atomic scale, and (3) providing data for the positions of atom columns, thereby facilitating the construction of structure models for complex defects.

AB - New methods for defect analysis can lead to improved interpretation of experimental data and thus better understanding of material properties. Although transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been used to study defects for many decades, interpretive ambiguities can arise for cases that seem simple or even trivial. Using geometric phase analysis (GPA), an image processing procedure, we show that an apparent simple line defect in pyrite has an entirely different character. It appears to be a b = [100] edge dislocation as viewed in a [001] high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image, but the measured u x and u y displacements are asymmetric, which is inconsistent with a simple line dislocation. Instead, the defect is best understood as a terminating {101} marcasite slab in pyrite. The simulated HRTEM image based on this model reproduces the defect contrast and illustrates the power of GPA analysis for (1) avoiding potential pitfalls of misinterpreting apparently simple defects in HRTEM images, (2) detecting differences in elastic properties at the atomic scale, and (3) providing data for the positions of atom columns, thereby facilitating the construction of structure models for complex defects.

KW - asymmetric displacement

KW - geometric phase analysis

KW - marcasite

KW - pyrite defect

KW - variations of elastic properties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884552685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884552685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1431927613001839

DO - 10.1017/S1431927613001839

M3 - Article

C2 - 23773546

AN - SCOPUS:84884552685

VL - 19

SP - 1303

EP - 1307

JO - Microscopy and Microanalysis

JF - Microscopy and Microanalysis

SN - 1431-9276

IS - 5

ER -