Complementary and alternative approaches to cancer prevention

Linda Larkey, Heather Greenlee, Lewis E. Mehl-Madrona

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) includes a variety of therapeutic approaches not typically taught in conventional medical schools or used by the majority of conventionally trained physicians (Gordon and Curtin 2000). Complementary refers to modalities used to complement, that is, used in addition to conventional medicine, while alternative is usually used to describe treatments intended to replace conventional treatment (Murphy, Morris et al. 1997). Some such practices enjoy a history of research to support claims of efficacy but have not gained popularity among the majority of medical practitioners (e.g., use of acupuncture to reduce chemotherapy-induced nausea) (Dibble, Chapman et al. 2000; Mayer 2000; Shen, Wenger et al. 2000); others either lack or have unsupporting research to back claims of safety or efficacy (e.g., use of milk thistle to protect liver function during chemotherapy) (Ladas and Kelly 2003). Even so, the labeling of which modalities are complementary or alternative may shift over time as research and practice move some into conventional use and disprove others. Some practices less amenable to our current research epistemology may never move out of CAM nomenclature or perceptions (such as multi-modality system approaches, and perhaps, spirituality).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationFundamentals of Cancer Prevention
PublisherSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
Pages105-129
Number of pages25
ISBN (Print)3540242120, 9783540242123
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Neoplasms
Research
Milk Thistle
Drug Therapy
Spirituality
Acupuncture
Medical Schools
Terminology
Nausea
Therapeutics
Physicians
Safety
Liver

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Larkey, L., Greenlee, H., & Mehl-Madrona, L. E. (2005). Complementary and alternative approaches to cancer prevention. In Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention (pp. 105-129). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26337-3_6

Complementary and alternative approaches to cancer prevention. / Larkey, Linda; Greenlee, Heather; Mehl-Madrona, Lewis E.

Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. p. 105-129.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Larkey, L, Greenlee, H & Mehl-Madrona, LE 2005, Complementary and alternative approaches to cancer prevention. in Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 105-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26337-3_6
Larkey L, Greenlee H, Mehl-Madrona LE. Complementary and alternative approaches to cancer prevention. In Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2005. p. 105-129 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26337-3_6
Larkey, Linda ; Greenlee, Heather ; Mehl-Madrona, Lewis E. / Complementary and alternative approaches to cancer prevention. Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. pp. 105-129
@inbook{dbd2d07432cc423d8a352a7430d3a79f,
title = "Complementary and alternative approaches to cancer prevention",
abstract = "Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) includes a variety of therapeutic approaches not typically taught in conventional medical schools or used by the majority of conventionally trained physicians (Gordon and Curtin 2000). Complementary refers to modalities used to complement, that is, used in addition to conventional medicine, while alternative is usually used to describe treatments intended to replace conventional treatment (Murphy, Morris et al. 1997). Some such practices enjoy a history of research to support claims of efficacy but have not gained popularity among the majority of medical practitioners (e.g., use of acupuncture to reduce chemotherapy-induced nausea) (Dibble, Chapman et al. 2000; Mayer 2000; Shen, Wenger et al. 2000); others either lack or have unsupporting research to back claims of safety or efficacy (e.g., use of milk thistle to protect liver function during chemotherapy) (Ladas and Kelly 2003). Even so, the labeling of which modalities are complementary or alternative may shift over time as research and practice move some into conventional use and disprove others. Some practices less amenable to our current research epistemology may never move out of CAM nomenclature or perceptions (such as multi-modality system approaches, and perhaps, spirituality).",
author = "Linda Larkey and Heather Greenlee and Mehl-Madrona, {Lewis E.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1007/3-540-26337-3_6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "3540242120",
pages = "105--129",
booktitle = "Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention",
publisher = "Springer Berlin Heidelberg",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Complementary and alternative approaches to cancer prevention

AU - Larkey, Linda

AU - Greenlee, Heather

AU - Mehl-Madrona, Lewis E.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) includes a variety of therapeutic approaches not typically taught in conventional medical schools or used by the majority of conventionally trained physicians (Gordon and Curtin 2000). Complementary refers to modalities used to complement, that is, used in addition to conventional medicine, while alternative is usually used to describe treatments intended to replace conventional treatment (Murphy, Morris et al. 1997). Some such practices enjoy a history of research to support claims of efficacy but have not gained popularity among the majority of medical practitioners (e.g., use of acupuncture to reduce chemotherapy-induced nausea) (Dibble, Chapman et al. 2000; Mayer 2000; Shen, Wenger et al. 2000); others either lack or have unsupporting research to back claims of safety or efficacy (e.g., use of milk thistle to protect liver function during chemotherapy) (Ladas and Kelly 2003). Even so, the labeling of which modalities are complementary or alternative may shift over time as research and practice move some into conventional use and disprove others. Some practices less amenable to our current research epistemology may never move out of CAM nomenclature or perceptions (such as multi-modality system approaches, and perhaps, spirituality).

AB - Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) includes a variety of therapeutic approaches not typically taught in conventional medical schools or used by the majority of conventionally trained physicians (Gordon and Curtin 2000). Complementary refers to modalities used to complement, that is, used in addition to conventional medicine, while alternative is usually used to describe treatments intended to replace conventional treatment (Murphy, Morris et al. 1997). Some such practices enjoy a history of research to support claims of efficacy but have not gained popularity among the majority of medical practitioners (e.g., use of acupuncture to reduce chemotherapy-induced nausea) (Dibble, Chapman et al. 2000; Mayer 2000; Shen, Wenger et al. 2000); others either lack or have unsupporting research to back claims of safety or efficacy (e.g., use of milk thistle to protect liver function during chemotherapy) (Ladas and Kelly 2003). Even so, the labeling of which modalities are complementary or alternative may shift over time as research and practice move some into conventional use and disprove others. Some practices less amenable to our current research epistemology may never move out of CAM nomenclature or perceptions (such as multi-modality system approaches, and perhaps, spirituality).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889994363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889994363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/3-540-26337-3_6

DO - 10.1007/3-540-26337-3_6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84889994363

SN - 3540242120

SN - 9783540242123

SP - 105

EP - 129

BT - Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention

PB - Springer Berlin Heidelberg

ER -