Compensation Benchmarking Practices in Large U.S. Local Governments

Michael Thom, Thomas Reilly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Growing competition over human capital has reiterated the importance of strategic practices to maintaining a high-quality public sector workforce. But how often does the public sector study pay and benefits among competitive peers? This study presents the findings of a national survey of human resource professionals regarding compensation benchmarking practices. Just over half of respondents indicated they conducted a benchmarking study within the last decade. A majority said their jurisdiction only compares compensation with other public employers, with a smaller number including both public and private competitors. Salaries were the most frequent topic of concern; fringe benefits and paid leave time were less often compared. Several jurisdictions conducted benchmarking studies for purposes other than compensation; about one quarter gathered data for purely informational purposes and 9% carried out a study in anticipation of labor negotiations. A series of best practices for benchmarking studies is offered in conclusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)340-355
Number of pages16
JournalPublic Personnel Management
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 14 2015

Fingerprint

benchmarking
Benchmarking
jurisdiction
public sector
Personnel
Wages
salary
human resources
human capital
best practice
employer
labor
Compensation and Redress
Local government
Jurisdiction
Public sector

Keywords

  • compensation
  • human resource management
  • local government
  • public management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Compensation Benchmarking Practices in Large U.S. Local Governments. / Thom, Michael; Reilly, Thomas.

In: Public Personnel Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, 14.09.2015, p. 340-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e19d5a1a3bd64183992adff3e3f59d98,
title = "Compensation Benchmarking Practices in Large U.S. Local Governments",
abstract = "Growing competition over human capital has reiterated the importance of strategic practices to maintaining a high-quality public sector workforce. But how often does the public sector study pay and benefits among competitive peers? This study presents the findings of a national survey of human resource professionals regarding compensation benchmarking practices. Just over half of respondents indicated they conducted a benchmarking study within the last decade. A majority said their jurisdiction only compares compensation with other public employers, with a smaller number including both public and private competitors. Salaries were the most frequent topic of concern; fringe benefits and paid leave time were less often compared. Several jurisdictions conducted benchmarking studies for purposes other than compensation; about one quarter gathered data for purely informational purposes and 9{\%} carried out a study in anticipation of labor negotiations. A series of best practices for benchmarking studies is offered in conclusion.",
keywords = "compensation, human resource management, local government, public management",
author = "Michael Thom and Thomas Reilly",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1177/0091026015586266",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "340--355",
journal = "Public Personnel Management",
issn = "0091-0260",
publisher = "International Personnel Management Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compensation Benchmarking Practices in Large U.S. Local Governments

AU - Thom, Michael

AU - Reilly, Thomas

PY - 2015/9/14

Y1 - 2015/9/14

N2 - Growing competition over human capital has reiterated the importance of strategic practices to maintaining a high-quality public sector workforce. But how often does the public sector study pay and benefits among competitive peers? This study presents the findings of a national survey of human resource professionals regarding compensation benchmarking practices. Just over half of respondents indicated they conducted a benchmarking study within the last decade. A majority said their jurisdiction only compares compensation with other public employers, with a smaller number including both public and private competitors. Salaries were the most frequent topic of concern; fringe benefits and paid leave time were less often compared. Several jurisdictions conducted benchmarking studies for purposes other than compensation; about one quarter gathered data for purely informational purposes and 9% carried out a study in anticipation of labor negotiations. A series of best practices for benchmarking studies is offered in conclusion.

AB - Growing competition over human capital has reiterated the importance of strategic practices to maintaining a high-quality public sector workforce. But how often does the public sector study pay and benefits among competitive peers? This study presents the findings of a national survey of human resource professionals regarding compensation benchmarking practices. Just over half of respondents indicated they conducted a benchmarking study within the last decade. A majority said their jurisdiction only compares compensation with other public employers, with a smaller number including both public and private competitors. Salaries were the most frequent topic of concern; fringe benefits and paid leave time were less often compared. Several jurisdictions conducted benchmarking studies for purposes other than compensation; about one quarter gathered data for purely informational purposes and 9% carried out a study in anticipation of labor negotiations. A series of best practices for benchmarking studies is offered in conclusion.

KW - compensation

KW - human resource management

KW - local government

KW - public management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939192350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939192350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0091026015586266

DO - 10.1177/0091026015586266

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 340

EP - 355

JO - Public Personnel Management

JF - Public Personnel Management

SN - 0091-0260

IS - 3

ER -