Comparisons of deterministic and stochastic traffic loading models

Maya Tatineni, David E. Boyce, Pitu Mirchandani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stochastic route choice models have been proposed as a more realistic alternative to the simpler deterministic route choice representations in models for loading traffic onto a network. However, studies on stochastic route choice models have thus far been limited to small experimental networks. Because stochastic models are in general considered to be more realistic in their assumptions than deterministic models, it becomes pertinent to examine their implementation and the corresponding traffic loading on a network of realistic size. Such an implementation for two stochastic route choice models is examined. The results indicate that the differences among the models, at the network level, for predicted link flows and average travel times between origin and destinations are not major, and therefore, deterministic models may suffice for long-range network planning. However, stochastic models predict the usage of more links in the network, and the difference in the flows at the link level may play an important role in travel advisory and route guidance systems. Some suggestions for future research are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-23
Number of pages8
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1607
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stochastic models
Travel time
Planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Comparisons of deterministic and stochastic traffic loading models. / Tatineni, Maya; Boyce, David E.; Mirchandani, Pitu.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1607, 1997, p. 16-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8cd3fc6dad8d41e3807b23a817f7b1cd,
title = "Comparisons of deterministic and stochastic traffic loading models",
abstract = "Stochastic route choice models have been proposed as a more realistic alternative to the simpler deterministic route choice representations in models for loading traffic onto a network. However, studies on stochastic route choice models have thus far been limited to small experimental networks. Because stochastic models are in general considered to be more realistic in their assumptions than deterministic models, it becomes pertinent to examine their implementation and the corresponding traffic loading on a network of realistic size. Such an implementation for two stochastic route choice models is examined. The results indicate that the differences among the models, at the network level, for predicted link flows and average travel times between origin and destinations are not major, and therefore, deterministic models may suffice for long-range network planning. However, stochastic models predict the usage of more links in the network, and the difference in the flows at the link level may play an important role in travel advisory and route guidance systems. Some suggestions for future research are presented.",
author = "Maya Tatineni and Boyce, {David E.} and Pitu Mirchandani",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "16--23",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1607",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of deterministic and stochastic traffic loading models

AU - Tatineni, Maya

AU - Boyce, David E.

AU - Mirchandani, Pitu

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Stochastic route choice models have been proposed as a more realistic alternative to the simpler deterministic route choice representations in models for loading traffic onto a network. However, studies on stochastic route choice models have thus far been limited to small experimental networks. Because stochastic models are in general considered to be more realistic in their assumptions than deterministic models, it becomes pertinent to examine their implementation and the corresponding traffic loading on a network of realistic size. Such an implementation for two stochastic route choice models is examined. The results indicate that the differences among the models, at the network level, for predicted link flows and average travel times between origin and destinations are not major, and therefore, deterministic models may suffice for long-range network planning. However, stochastic models predict the usage of more links in the network, and the difference in the flows at the link level may play an important role in travel advisory and route guidance systems. Some suggestions for future research are presented.

AB - Stochastic route choice models have been proposed as a more realistic alternative to the simpler deterministic route choice representations in models for loading traffic onto a network. However, studies on stochastic route choice models have thus far been limited to small experimental networks. Because stochastic models are in general considered to be more realistic in their assumptions than deterministic models, it becomes pertinent to examine their implementation and the corresponding traffic loading on a network of realistic size. Such an implementation for two stochastic route choice models is examined. The results indicate that the differences among the models, at the network level, for predicted link flows and average travel times between origin and destinations are not major, and therefore, deterministic models may suffice for long-range network planning. However, stochastic models predict the usage of more links in the network, and the difference in the flows at the link level may play an important role in travel advisory and route guidance systems. Some suggestions for future research are presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001944833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001944833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001944833

SP - 16

EP - 23

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1607

ER -